Is The Still not part of the Lucky Four Group? Considering it is the "Lucky FOUR Group", and not the "Lucky THREE Group", wouldn't The Still be part of it to make the peak count four and live up to its name?
Another thing worth noting is this statement: "The western peaks in the range - Cheam, Lady, Baby Munday and Stewart, are known in areas of the Fraser Valley where there are visible, as the "Four Sisters"." While Cheam and Lady are for sure easily visible from the valley, I don't believe Baby Munday is, especially considering its western neighbor, Knight Peak, is higher than it and would more than likely block it from view. As for Stewart, I am unsure whether it is visible. It might be, or may not. But either way, what I'd love to know is, why would Knight not be part of the "Four Sisters"? I've actually never heard of the whole Four Sisters thing before other than here so if someone could educate me on that, it would certainly help.
By the way: If anyone reading this gets a chance, go climb up the Knight Peak trail. It comes off of the old section of Airplane Creek Road, crosses Airplane Creek, and goes up really steeply into the basin below Knight and Baby Munday Peak. From there you can directly reach the summit of Knight (which I did), and also access Baby Munday (class 3 scramble, fairly exposed I hear), Stewart Peak, and more than likely The Still. You can actually summit Knight, Baby Munday & Stewart in one day, although I only got to the top of Knight since I had some time limitations. Seriously though, check it out sometime... I'd be happy to provide more info to anyone whose interested.
