Dustimagic

Archives
Archive 1
Archive 2

Hi Dustimagic, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. Gizza^{Chat ©} 11:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have received your message. I was busy so I could not reply until now. Best wish for your adminship.--Jusjih 08:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 18:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes yes, congrats indeed! Didn't realize til I got that friendly note about my AIV request :P Congrats! --lightdarkness ^(talk) 13:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congrats!!!--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 23:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

You admins are doing a great job. Thanks. Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 19:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I second that; thank you! - CobaltBlueTony 19:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm reverting your edit to Snakes on a Plane. You had changed Internet meme to Internet phenomenon. In fact there is a difference: Snakes on a plane is a meme, it's already developed derivatives (snakes on a blog, snakes on an elevator, snakes on <insert object here), which is the main characteristic of a meme. The internet phenomenon article, moreover, is broader and includes both memes and persons from the internet such as Tucker Max and Ellen Feiss. Meme is more appropriate. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:09, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

DOH! I had no idea that Internet meme was merged with phenomenon. Self reverting back to your version! ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

No worries. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

==Welcome to VandalProof== Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page if you have any questions. AmiDaniel (Talk) 00:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Can you tell me what I did wrong on this page to be labeled vandalism? Aelfthrytha 04:00, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

New tool might have some bugs to work out in that case before it is fully implemented. Doesn't seem to meet the good faith assumption as is. Aelfthrytha 04:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

okay,dude, the changes in Emma Watson are factual. I read ALL the Harry Potter books and the first book IS called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. Not "Philosopher's". Also,the thing about Peter Van "Pels",is true, too. I read the Diary of Anne Frank once and it said Peter Van Daan, not Peter Van "Pels". So that is not considered "vandalism". I do have to say sorry about the other recent things.*gulp* but the others were from facts!!!!! geez, u gotta understand THAT, at least!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.142.78.173 (talk • contribs) 11 April 2006 (UTC)

In reply on Dustimagic's behalf (forgive me if I'm presumptious), you've consistently ignored the invisible comments (visible during editing) that clearly state, "EDITORS: Please do not change "Philosopher's"—see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Describing_points_of_view#Nationalism". This means you've also ignored the passage within the article that states, "(released in the United States as Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone)"—in other words, it was "Sorceror's" only in the United States. Wikipedia does its best, per policy, to take a world view. Please respect that. RadioKirk talk to me 04:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for backing me up regarding the Harry Potter issue. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

You're quite welcome. I'm very familiar with this issue; in fact, I'm the one who wrote the invis comment ref'd above ;) RadioKirk talk to me 04:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

that statement is TRUE already! In the book, it said that his name WAS Peter Van Daan. I think YOU mispelled it!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.142.78.173 (talk • contribs) 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Replied to talk page. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW everyone tells me after I've been nothing but an illusion! but thanks?

oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW everyone tells me after I've been reading nothing but an illusion! but thanks?

I was creating a new category on a users talk page. I assumed the edit summary would be returned as the name of that category. Thanks for the warning, but I make better summaries for my edits than most users. You'd know that if you went to my contributions page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jelligraze on average my summaries are at least a sentence or more long. --Jelligraze 04:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's just a friendly reminder nothing to take as a warning. I had been sending them to all the recent changes without summaries (most of them are chronic non-summarys). You do make more summaries than most. Thanks ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 18:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey Dusti,

I see you speed deleted AJ Roach, and I gather that this was done without an AfD vote. I had nothing to do with that page, but as something of a fan of the guy's music I'm somewhat dissappointed. His music does not fit into any mass market genre, but it is not obvious to me that he does not meet WP:MUSIC criteria. Consider the following from WP:Music:

• Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country, reported in notable and verifiable sources.

• Roach has toured most of the US and Scottland in 2004-2005 playing small venues.tour, press.

• Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
• Has been the subject of a half hour or hour broadcast on a national radio network.

• In ~late 2004 Roach was featured as a live in studio guest on BBC2's Bob Harris Country. I have the exact date somewhere. Harris was playing his music often at the time. Seems their online playlists are not archived beyond a few weeks though.

• Has won or placed in a major music competition.

• For acoustic singer-songwriters winning first place in the general category of the Chris Austin Songwriting Competition at MerleFest is considered significant. 2004 winners.

Would it be a waste of time to ask for this deletion to be reviewed? -MrFizyx 03:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have undeleted this article per a review of Mr. Roach. He is indeed notable enough to be included and does in fact meet WP:MUSIC by some of the standards expressed above. I apologize for this matter and thank you for alerting me. Some articles sent to speedy deletion are deleted by mistake as was this one. Sorry, ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Great, thanks for taking care of that! -MrFizyx 04:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I was just patrolling recent changes, and I noticed a few strange edits you've made, I believe with VandalProof. For instance you posted a VP-formatted warning on an anon's talk page after this revert. What seemed strange to me was that, on the revert, it simply left and edit summary of "Reverted edits by X to last version by Y" without "using VandalProof." And the warning you left was completely without any edit summary. Is this a bug in the software, have you managed to tweak it somewhow I didn't know was possible, or did you not use VP to do these reverts? I'm just curious to know. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, I didn't tweak it. What's been happening, and I have notived this with other users as well I believe, is that when the VandalProof refert button is pressed the program acts like it reverts the changes but instead only posts a warning message. So what I've been doing is clicking the Revert Template:Test:? button and quickly pressing my admin rollback button however sometimes the page loads to fast. Is there something I can do to avoid this problem? Thanks for noticing. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Aha, I know why. I just checked your monobook and you don't have popups installed. Unfortunately VP is currently still dependent upon popups (though I didn't know until about two days ago ... I thought autoclick and autosummary were built into WP), but later releases will be independent of it. In fact, my local version is almost free of popups, just a couple more hours and it'll be there. For now, you're just going to have to add {{subst:navpop}} to your monobook.js. Sorry about the inconvenience, but that should fix the problem. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I was just reading this over and saw that might be the problem. Keep up the improvements and good work with the program I think its amazing despite my problems. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

hey i put up the myspace page link for mumia and you took it down. since dead prez had a myspace page link, i figured others could. maybe you thought Tahir was just some fan, but he is a political revolutionary rapper, and he regularly updates the 'Free Mumia' myspace page. here is a link to Tahir's Homecoming cd on amazon : [1]

hope you put back the link, roweezy

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.252.11.139 (talk • contribs) 17 April 2006 (UTC)

An individual completely deleted a large portion of the gangsta rap page, including several paragraphs about the different eras of the specific subgenre. Thus, I decided to change it back to its original state, but it's manifest that, perhaps, the changes were intended to be made and were not the product of an ostentatious user...

Hi Dustinmagic,

66.109.218.95, who has only done one vandalism, has got two warnings. Should one of the messages be removed? Otherwise, keep up the good work! Thanks, Andjam 02:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the extra warning. I think we both posted our warnings around the same time. Thanks, ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 02:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, but I wasn't testing anything Dustimagic. I apologize for the miscommunication, as I'm very excited about this new American Dogme Film. It will be featured in the upcoming film festivals around the world and states.

Thank you so much,

Michael Kumar Ahuja OLA Productions Tarzana, CA 91335

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.75.74.200 (talk • contribs) 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower ^háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you are getting this, it is because you do or did work on Scouting articles (see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scouting#Participants_and_primary_areas_of_interest).

As the Scouting WikiProject has been formed since early January 2006, we've had many great improvements made in this area of Wiki and I want to personally thank everyone for their help. We don't always agree on things, but we keep moving forward. YIS, Rlevse 22:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

User:207.80.127.250 is a repeat vandal. All his recent edits are vandalism. He vandalized my userpage. Maybe you can take care of this issue. He's been blocked several times before. Thanks.

Chad --> Eclectek 15:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

User:HarmilIs reverting articles like “Bob Sagget” unnecessary. I was putting names at the bottom, of the article about common names he was called and I said that the names were harassment. Yet he called it vandalism. Not only that he post any objections when I was going to repost it (Talk:Bob Saget). He is taking away freedom of speech. My claims are valid as he has been blocked before. Please help.

User:Wikipedialuva

After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Men har du en mamma eller vad menar du? Bävrar har svansar! Jag vet att trän barn inte föder jag hoppas du förstår läser inte. 217.209.101.245 04:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey, Dustimagic. I would like it of you could come to the next Philwiki weekly meeting. It's at 9PM Mountain time this Thursday. We do it on AIM to make it go quickly, so if you're interested, please convey your SN to me at some point. Please leave a message about how you want to get it to me on my Philwiki account. Thanks. Donbas 07:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is regards to my editing in Death Note.

I wish to clarify that I did not make any changes in Death Note. I simply fixed the arrangement of the First and Second Arcs so as to make the article more presentable to read.

Thanks

01:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 70.68.46.180 Ominae

As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower ^háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey dustin, the JCP seal is being deleted. Check on that. I'm too lazy

Chad --> Eclectek 05:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I took care of it Chad --> Eclectek 15:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

You posted a welcome on my user page when I first started using Wikipedia back in January. I've made a few edits in Wikipedia since then but my main activity has been creation of a wiki related to Jesuit identity. At this point, it should be viewed as a proof of concept. I tried to reach you by e-mail from your user page but I got a message saying e-mail is not set up or is disabled. You can e-mail me through my user page. Thanks. Workman 13:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For dedication to improving and expanding Wikipedia. Good job! Sharkface217 02:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AddisonTollTunnel.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 13:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pbacchi 07:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)(talk) a page was deleted and you mentioned in the deletion log you had a copy. Would it be possible for me to get a copy of the page that was Principles of system architecture. Thanks in advance.Reply

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 01:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:BenKweller.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I reverted vandalism on it. ;) --Pupster21 Talk To Me 22:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Venturestrip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:ArrowheadPatch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DoubleH.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:JesuitDallasMuseumLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TeenScreen.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MADDlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

My main contribution on Wiki is on Billings, Montana and not It seems that I have to have sources now. I really don't want to take the time and effort to research all the sources for everything I contribute. I know that Wiki doesn't want people to put untruthful information. I don't know what your position on this but some if not all of it comes from the residents who actually live there like myself and knows what goes on. All of my information I contribute at least is true or reasonable. I check the accuracy of contribs on the website and make any necessary changes or deletions.

Later,

Wolfdog1 07:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SpaceDude.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:BigTexanMotel.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 06:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Flight1248.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 22:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

As WikiProject Philmont Scout Ranch seems to have been inactive since the turn of the year, I propose making it a taskforce of Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting, similar to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Girl Guiding and Girl Scouting task force. That will ensure it won't get deleted (the WP:Council has been cleaning out inactive projects in recent months) and it will standardize that project with our existing MoS and membership base. We invite your suggestions and comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting#mergefrom WikiProject Philmont Scout Ranch. Chris 20:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

We have now gone ahead and moved this, it can now be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Philmont Scout Ranch task force. Chris 07:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ranger Connection.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HCTRA.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 01:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I notice you voted against this being kept last time. I have renominated it. Currently the vote is in favour of delete anyway, but not enough people have voted, so if you could ask objective people to look this over and give their thoughts, this page can be decided on sooner rather than later.

Cheers, JJJ999 —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJ999 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Mountian Creek Lake Bridge.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:SetLoveFree.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

After reading your comment on my talk page and reviewing the situation (examining portions of the article's history, the reason given for the two deletions, etc.), I have found that the article's history was deleted improperly and that I overreacted to whatever content problems I thought I saw. The article does need extensive work and cleanup but that doesn't require deletion (except maybe for some of the earlier edits including text from here. Nonetheless, I found no reason for a "mass article-history purge".

As for the school's administration, I'm sorry they are upset but Wikipedia does not write for the benefit of outside entities. Much of the article still reads like an advertisement and still requires a lot of cleanup and removal of unencyclopedic content. I can assure you that I have nothing person against the school and have never even been to Texas. I hope this resolves the issues regarding this matter. Bumm13 (talk) 07:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

hi i am sorry snurgle x —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.135.58 (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why do u do history no justice? Frankie Goes to Hollywood (FGTH) was a UK dance-pop band that was popular in the mid 1980s. The Liverpool group which became famous was fronted by Holly Johnson (vocals), supported by Paul Rutherford (vocals, keyboards), Peter Gill (drums, percussion), Mark O'Toole (bass guitar) and Brian Nash (guitar). At first, Frankie Goes To Hollywood was with Ambrose Reynolds, Steve Lovell and Phil Renshaw....this band demoed and rehearsed but never performed live. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.104.40.192 (talk) 10:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

just saying your intro could be better i almost fell asleep reading it

             samantha nicole pinder  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.254.35 (talk) 23:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply 

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dustimagic! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. β^_command 17:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AATT.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:LewisvilleLakeTollBridge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:BMHC.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SouthwestParkway.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 14:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Rayado.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Philbreak.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I thought you may be interested in this here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/R._D._Reynolds Spoke shook (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply