User talk:Patton123/Archive/2009-10

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nice to see you around again. ceranthor 19:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Good to see you too. Things have changed a bit since I stopped editing I see...--Patton123 (talk) 20:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

What happened to your pretty green signature? :( –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deleted it. Felt it was a bit too...flamboyant :p . Think I'll keep to the default sig.--Patton123 (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was just reading that FA you wrote, could you reference the paragraph below?

Operation Iraqi Freedom PEO Soldier Lessons Learned, a report on the performance of weapons in Iraq, was published by Lieutenant Colonel Jim Smith of the U.S. Army on May 15 2003. Smith spoke positively of the M249, claiming that it "provided the requisite firepower at the squad level as intended". He praised the SPW variant, noting that its "short barrel and forward pistol grip allowed for very effective use of the SAW in urban terrain". At the National Defense Industrial Association in 2007, Colonel Al Kelly of the 1st Battalion, 17th Infantry gave a presentation describing the M249 as having "good range, excellent reliability" and an "excellent tracer". He said that a cloth pouch was preferred over the plastic box for holding linked ammunition, and that "knock-down power is poor but is compensated by rate of fire".[citation needed] ceranthor 10:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Is the in prose reference not good enough? Will reference then when I get time.--Patton123 (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I didn't remove the ref, or add the citation needed sign. I was simply reading the article and noticed it. ceranthor 23:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

No I'm talking about the "Operation Iraqi Freedom PEO Soldier Lessons Learned, a report on the performance of weapons in Iraq, was published by Lieutenant Colonel Jim Smith of the U.S. Army on May 15 2003"?--Patton123 (talk) 23:20, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just so you know, there was at least one person running for admin/cratship every single day in January.---Balloonman ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 02:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Replied.--Patton123 (talk) 08:50, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

A Request for Comments has been opened concerning the conduct of Rjanag. This follows the suggestion of a number of arbitrators at the Rjanag RfA. I am contacting you because you are mentioned in this RfC and the prior RfA, and previously discussed Rjanag's conduct with him.

The RfC can be found here.

Editors (including those who certify the RfC) can offer comments by:

(a) posting their own view; and/or

(b) endorsing one or more views of others.

You may certify or endorse the original RfC statement. You may also endorse as many views as you wish, including Rjanag's response. Anyone can endorse any views, regardless of whether they are outside parties or inside parties.

Information on the RfC process can be found at:

1. RfC Conduct
2. RfC Guide
3. RfC Guide 2
4. RfC Rules

Thanks. --Epeefleche (talk) 10:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm not very active these days and don't remember the details of this so I'm afraid I won't be able to comment, sorry.--Patton123 (talk) 18:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem. You should not feel obligated to comment.

FYI, your comment here was "Comments like this are one of the reasons why collaboration is going to hell in so many areas of wikipedia. I really was appaled by this comment. I would really be ashamed if I made it", and related to this RfA post in which Rjanag wrote "I hate Ottava Rima".--Epeefleche (talk) 06:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:SearchBoxTop.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 04:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Reply

I saw your recent essay. I'd suggest you drop a note at the WP:LAW project. There are some very legal issues that are relevant to this, some of these have serious implications. Legal advice from non-lawyers can be criminal in some places, and lawyers who give legal advice can face professional sanctions as well. I don't see a problem with your proposal, but I think it should have oversight. Shadowjams (talk) 06:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply