User talk:Black Kite/Archive17

Like the header says, welcome back. Synergy 22:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Thankyou! Black Kite 22:15, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back. Ready for another deletion spree? bibliomaniac15 22:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fully in line with policy, of course. Black Kite 22:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good to see you back indeed. I hope you enjoyed your break. Seraphim♥Whipp 22:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I hope that everything was okay in the interim. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes thanks both. Black Kite 17:21, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy to see your name pop up on my watchlist again. Things are improving: I hope you got a chance to see Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-08-11/Dispatches. You migth want to collaborate with Elcobbola on Part 2. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm looking at it now - looks very good. Black Kite 17:21, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have just arrived home from camp, and what better a welcome than Black ktie returning? Much love, brother/sister! Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back :) FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 00:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad to see you back as well. Horologium (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Thanks all! :) Black Kite 10:49, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

... and you're on AN. Thought you'd like to know. Synergy 05:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I should have informed you first. Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 05:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back, now get to work :). You were a member of the Wikipedia:Working_group_on_ethnic_and_cultural_edit_wars and they issued a report, maybe you feel up to endorsing, dissenting, staring at the page? MBisanz ^talk 12:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

(First sorry for my english, this is not my mother tongue. Hope my message is comprehensible though So, thanks for your intervention on this article yesterday. I had hard time with the IP(apparently an admin)that wanted to process a speedy deletion at all cost without caring the reliable sources(including allmusic, Rockdetector) and the discography which attested their notability.

I don't know which admin did it, but I wonder why this article has been been arbitrary deleted without any concertation or verification, when there are plenty of evidences of their notability all over the web. Aren't we supposed to process with a vote in such cases? Especially when a band has 6 albums on professional labels(Sleezy Records, Holy rocords, Black Lotus records), one should be prudent. Can a Admin arbitrary decide to delete an article when he is biased?

Anyway once again, thank you very much for your intervention and you sense of jugement! GreetingsFrédérick Duhautpas (talk) 12:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that you deleteted it. I checked the page of the admin who did it before restoring it and that wasn't you.( but now with the restoring I don't know anymore who he is). Anyway, don't worry, 1. I know and DO refer to Wikipedia policy in terms of verifiability. 2.if you just take a look to this article, you'll notice it does not lack of reliable sources here...As I said even sources including allmusic and Rockdetector attest their notability. Anyway even if an article doesn't provide sources, it's often easy for a user to provide them so I wonder why an article should be deleted, when it is possible to make anouncement or a proposition of deletion with a vote. I think this deletion was a bit excessive.Frédérick Duhautpas (talk) 13:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

ok, thanks ;)Frédérick Duhautpas (talk) 13:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

No se hablar bien inglés, asi que si usred sabe lgo de castellano, lo discutimos, pero me parece que decir "Fetiche" a una persona por ser de otra raza, me parece racismo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elias Enoc (talk • contribs) 13:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

El termino "Fetiche" es de por si despectivo. ¿Porque no se hace un articulo de "European fetixh" or "Withe fetish"?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Elias Enoc (talk • contribs) 13:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply