Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

This is an article I just when through FAC with, but it was suggested that the copy editing was really lacking (English is not my main language and I am not very used to the English Wikipedia standards). Thuiop (talk) 19:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Working Miniapolis 22:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Miniapolis 17:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot ! Thuiop (talk) 09:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a thorough edit to bring it in line with WWP:MOS I have added where I feel citatations are needed. Please let me know when someone has gone through the article and I will start the process of adding further citations. Thanks for your help!. Karst (talk) 09:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Working Dhtwiki (talk) 05:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•   Done Dhtwiki (talk) 21:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An old GA article needed to be copyedited in order for it to be maintained and accurate. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 18:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Working; @Boneless Pizza!:, please note I rarely check refs while copy-editing unless something seems off, so inaccuracies may not be picked up. Fact-checking is not a c/e task. Baffle☿gab 08:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page was promoted to Good Article status recently, but I'd like to nominate it for FAC. I would greatly appreciate a copyedit in case there were any issues I missed. Thanks in advance. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Working Mox Eden (talk) 02:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same as the user above; I'd like to get this article FA-ready (FAC). Thanks Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 10:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked over it and fixed a couple small things that I found, but I'd like someone with more experience to look it over before I mark it done. Moritoriko (talk) 05:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For FAC prep, I highly recommend WP:PR. dxneo (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently expanded, needs copyediting. Thank you.M.A.LasTroniN910^t@lk 10:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone check Afrique Victime for any mistakes? The page is a planned GAN. TheNuggeteer (talk) 09:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already nominated, you can still copyedit this article. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 01:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is very poor in quality. Wcamp9 (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to submit the Yugoslav krone article for GAN. I believe its prose would benefit from a copyedit to fix grammar and improve flow. Thanks. Tomobe03 (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Needs copy/edited for a GAN in the future. Article has a POTD set as well, meaning it will be featured on the main page in a couple of months. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 14:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit for this recently promoted GA. Thank you! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need copyedit for WP:DYK. Mehedi Abedin 11:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA reviewer was concerned with the article's prose. lunaeclipse ^(talk) 11:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very detailed, but its prose is kind of slanted towards recent events. It is also cited to few social media sites which I'm having a hard time trimming. Aiming for GAC (GAN) for now, then FAC afterwards. dxneo (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really new article which is linked up to several highly viewed articles (including one which has gotten over 1 million views in the last 30 days). Honestly just need a second set of eyes to copy/edit it real quick. Only 36k bytes in size, but with high-viewage potential, it should be grammatically solid and correct. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Triangular bipyramid is another article I will take a submit to the GOCE. I have checked the writings in the article, but there is one problem in the section Triangular bipyramid#Related polyhedra. I'm aware that this section might be a problem during the process of GAN. If someone wants to copyedit the whole article, I appreciate it. Many thanks. Note: This article is about mathematics, especially in geometry of polyhedron. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 11:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting copy edit on the article Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman season 1. Thank you very much. NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been fixing up this article by myself lately, but I'm unsure of how to format/write some aspects as it's covering a very distant topic from my usual edits. Hoping I can nominate it for GA (GAN) after this, as it's a North Korean film with a controversial background involving kidnapping and all that, which deserves more attention. Thanks. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 05:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GCE. My major concerns for this article are whether I am violating notability in the "Reception" section or giving undue depth in its history section since I'd like to eventually get it to GA (GAN) status. Please be ruthless. Ornov Ganguly TALK 13:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Currently a C-class article (honestly would myself probably assess it as Start, even). But just want it to get it to a decent-looking place. Did some work on it right now, but it could certainly use some extra copy editing. Soulbust (talk) 20:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Planning on taking this to FAC so I'm thinking a copyedit would be a good first step. GamerPro64 04:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The benevolent being who expanded the article doesn't have English grammar as his strong point. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For a GAN.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 22:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A C-Class article needs a copyediting for grammar etc as I am not native English speaker and may have made mistakes. Nizil (talk) 13:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This passed GA-N a few months ago. The article's prose needs some polishing. lunaeclipse ⚧ ^(talk) 13:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting copu edit of the article Ted Bundy (film). Thanks. NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a short article about a meme born out of fighting games and video streaming. I am not a very good English speaker, so I would appreciate it if you could correct my English to natural English. 狄の用務員 (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it to DYK. 狄の用務員 (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plan to nominate it for DYK. Ghazaalch (talk) 08:11, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in need of in-depth copyediting. Thank you! OceanHok (talk) 10:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would like a vetting of the prose for tone and brevity as I prepare for an FAC. Thank you in advanced! DAP 💅 02:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Stores section of Wegmans can use copyediting because I do think it looks more like a timeline. I think this section can also use copyediting for a major cleanup to the section and I also think it can be more organized as well. The Cadillac Ranger (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to bring this to FAC. However, from previous comments about the FAC nom, the article needs further clarity. I appreciate if anyone can give a look through, especially reorganising the details of the artwork section. ZKang123 (talk) 01:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on this article, but I think this one can use copyediting. The Cadillac Ranger (talk) 03:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is currently at FAR but changes have received little feedback. These sections:

• Conquest of Wales
• Character as king
• Parliament and the expulsion of the Jews
• Administration in Ireland
• Legacy

are either new or substantially rewritten. A copy edit of these parts would be very welcome; it is not necessary to copy edit the whole article. Jim Killock (talk) 12:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prepared for a possible FA review (FAC).Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page was promoted to Good Article status recently, but I'd like to nominate it for FAC. I would greatly appreciate a copyedit in case there were any issues I missed. Thanks in advance. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to submit the Ivo Frank for a GAN and I believe a copyedit would improve article's prose. Thanks! Tomobe03 (talk) 16:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to improve the writing for this article before it gets re-nominated into the Good Article Nomination (GAN). This article was nominated before but did not pass due to errors in grammar and wording that were not well written at that time. I finished fixing those issues brought up by the reviewer, but I still believe some prose and grammar checks need to be made. Rephrasing is done well and accurately. HereIGoAgain (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Partly done I have only done until before the "Music and lyrics" section. Mox Eden (talk) 11:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For a potential future FA nom (FAC). Sohom (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article was previously copyedited in March 2023, but a lot has changed since then and I would like another copyedit before a future GAN. Mainly looking for prose and MOS. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 21:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Completely rewrote article over the past few months, and am currently working for an ACR as the article view count has spiked dramatically due to it being in national news. I'd appreciate another pair of eyes looking the article over for grammar issues and flow.

Best, GGOTCC (talk) 19:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is currently sitting at GAN, and the reviewer suggested that I take this to the Guild of Copy Editors before we continue the review. Fossil mammals rarely get attention on Wikipedia, and Palaeotherium in particular has a very old research history plus extensive anatomical coverage that has never been well-translated to most non-expert readers. As a result, it's a bit tricky to make easy to read and fully comprehensive at the same time. Additionally, it may be filled with some grammatical errors. If anyone could help to copyedit the article, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks. PrimalMustelid (talk) 19:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fairly straightforward. Seems like most of the article is just a copied edit summary. Copyedit will involve deleting most of the plot summary. Catalyzzt (talk) 13:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential FAC, so I'd be happy to receive any general suggestions for improvement, alongside the copy edit. Thank you. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an old GA I made in the past and expanded it with real world information while tonning down the in-universe info. I don't plan to make it FA but I believe its prose needs some touching.Tintor2 (talk) 23:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failed FAC. Needs restructuring + grammatical fixes. Post-copyedit feedback is appreciated. Thanks, TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 03:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article went through a major cleanup & restructuring after its 4th AfD (I participated in the article rewrite). It then failed as a GAN with the only reviewer saying: The article needs a pretty major copyedit to be written readable for someone not already completely familiar with the game. Any help would be appreciated! Sariel Xilo (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in need of in-depth copyediting. Thank you! OceanHok (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(DYK) I nominated Kanifing for a DYK, and the reviewer noted that the article may have issues with close paraphrasing. The reviewer suggested I take it here so others can help fix these issues. (Pinging the reviewer, Chipmunkdavis.) — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 16:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  On hold; hi @Vigilantcosmicpenguin:, copyright problems should be dealt with before a copy-edit takes place. If only part of the article is closely paraphrased, please identify the (sub-)section(s) using {{Close paraphrasing}} so a copy-editor knows where to work. If text is close enough to the original to be a copyright violation, it should be removed and the revisions deleted via {{Copyvio-revdel}}. Discuss at REQ talk. Baffle☿gab 20:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Chipmunkdavis again since they are the one who alerted me of the close paraphrasing issues. CMD, could you add the tags in the relevant sections? I want to make sure the article is tagged accurately. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 21:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note, Vigilantcosmicpenguin, my concerns have now been dealt with and I've removed my hold notice. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential for GA (GAN).Tintor2 (talk) 22:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite per grammar rules. Remove tag at top when done. DareshMohan (talk) 03:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit for this relatively short and recently promoted GA. Thanks in advance! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like it to be a GAN and I think its biggest problem might be its grammar and wording. The article isn't long IMO. Thanks! Please ping me so that I get notified of your response. Imbluey2 02:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For a probable GAN. The article is not very long. Note that it is important to stick to the sources; if you have any queries while copy editing, please contact me at my t/p. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as needing copyedit. Important because it is so bad for health. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A potential second GA nomination. I would appreciate some help to copyedit the article. Thanks. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 04:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GAN, partly because needs copyedit. I hope to nominate it again later this year. If you spot any other problems please tag them with “cn”, “clarify” etc. If you don’t understand a sentence please let me know, because I think we need to assume a typical reader has very little previous knowledge of the subject. Please could you make the article “flow” better, as I think I am weak on that. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential elections in Oklahoma. During its FLC another user noted prose issues. I felt that it was fine and was hoping for a copy edit to fix these issues Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential GA (GAN). Fix grammar. DareshMohan (talk) 09:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GAN working to get this up to GA. This is my second request I'm just getting into the que ASAP. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently movved from draft to mainspace and could use a second set of eyes. Thanks! –DMartin 14:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reworked the article and will nominate at GAN in the future, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 00:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs copy-edit for sentence structure and concision as per talk page outcome. Thanks Rahim231 (talk) 12:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For a GAN.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 12:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Newly-created article about a street. A short article, needs copyedit. Mehedi Abedin 13:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For GAN. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old FA undergoes a lot of changes, so It might need to be carefully copyedited I think. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 06:09, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was recommended to submit a request for a copy edit for a stadium article I upgraded from a stub to B Class and a GA review. I would appreciate a peer looking over my work to give some future suggestions. Cltjames (talk) 05:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(PR) Hi! I'm requesting a copyedit for the page 1918–1920 New York City rent strikes to cleanup any grammar I missed, fix tone and create a more cohesive piece overall. Its somewhat of a weak point for me. As the main editor of the page I'm more then happy to answer any questions about the history to clarify any ambiguity in the article or general questions of any kind. Thanks so much! LoomCreek (talk) 19:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]