Ineuw

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

• If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

• You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

• If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 04:36, 27 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Leona Helmsley has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 01:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Masada2000. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 03:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help, in Kingdom of Hungary article! MagyarTürk (talk)

You are welcome! Are you Canadian? Nice to meet you. It's my YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/PeterCanadian

I am moving to Canada soon, to Quebec to Abercorn. That's a little village close to the US boards. Population is around 300 peoples. I guess you are from Quebec, first language is French? :)

MagyarTürk (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC).Reply

Because I want live in peace there, in a great forest with the beautiful trees and animals. I don't want be in the evil European civilization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MagyarTürk (talk • contribs) 02:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

Can I ask that, have you got msn address? I would like add you, I have some question about Quebec and you also can ask me about Hungarians etc. :)

MagyarTürk (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC).Reply

Hey! Thanks for that link, I will read that, when I have freetime! ;) I added you, its my msn hunnicboy@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by MagyarTürk (talk • contribs) 21:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup tags such as the one you placed on Henry Wilde are perfectly useless if the cleanup required is not obvious. Generally, I remove them if I cannot see anything to clean up, but as the author of this article I have not done so in this case as that might be perceived as a bit WP:OWNish. Please take the trouble to state the problems on the talk page or else tag individually the items you think require attention, or, if you have just made a mistake, remove the tag. SpinningSpark 10:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

That's ridiculous, how can someone who has been on Wikipedia since 2003 with nearly 1,000 edits not know how to remove a template? You just delete it in a normal edit (the template is the text between double curly braces). SpinningSpark 15:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it would be useful if you could provide comments and examples of your concerns in the talk page. --Insider201283 (talk) 12:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

May I suggest putting your comments on the Talk:Amway page please, better to get more discussion. --Insider201283 (talk) 01:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, could I request you follow through on the talk page? If there's no further response I'll remove the tag. --Insider201283 (talk) 09:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, While I appreciate that you were trying to improve the encyclopedia, edits like your your recent changes of [[Pre-Code]] to [[Pre-Code Hollywood|Pre-Code]] are highly discouraged. Please see Wikipedia:NOTBROKEN for a full explanation.

Also {{PROD}} is for articles only. You can use WP:RfD for redirects that you would like to see deleted.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask me, --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Dangerous Crossing 1953 DVD Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I put a comment on the userbox ideas page. Take a shortcut through your contribs page if you can't find it. RascalthePeaceful (t) 00:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the userbox and I like your attitude towards life in general, as expressed by with your choices. We seem to have something in common. Please consider my using some of your userboxes as an expression of recognition. :DIneuw (talk) 13:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please note that userboxes may be filed in appropriate subcategories of Category:Wikipedians, but they are not permitted to be filed directly in a category that's intended for articles. For example, your Quebec box may be filed in Category:Wikipedians in Quebec, but not in Category:Quebec. Please see Wikipedia:User categories if you need further information about how to locate appropriate categories. Bearcat (talk) 00:50, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on User:Ineuw/Ludovica Military Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Ineuw/Ludovica Military Academy|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ineuw (talk) 11:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 7aedb1dc52e1308a790457e67df488e2

A tag has been placed on User:Ineuw/Franz Josef University of Kolozsvár, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Ineuw/Franz Josef University of Kolozsvár|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ineuw (talk) 03:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, I am C.Kent87... If you don't mind, I'd like to ask for some help in an area you may know something about. Perhaps you can give your 2 cents to a discussion I'm involved in? Or let another know about the dispute?

In the article Castle, they have removed reference to Chapultepec Castle in the small section 'Later use and revival castles' (It has been there for two years), for various (slightly unclear) reasons. The first comment after its deletion was left on my page, here. Also, you can see the other "reasoning" for its removal at Talk:Castle/Section, which I'm involved in. The opposition goes as far as comparing Chapultepec with this "castle" [1]...

First, it was only that there wasn't an explicit source stating it as "revival castle' (User:Nev1 wanted no less than for it to state in exact terms its existence as such), but now they just don't think it warrants a mention. One user doesn't want it as a part of the article at all because "already it has an article of its own" - As if the other castles do not (?). Another 'doesn't see my argument".

Technicalities are thrown everywhere, but I believe enough information for its inclusion exists. Chapultepec Castle is just as much a revival castle as those listed from England - yet they seem to overlook that, perhaps because it is in Mexico...? The time period, etc. all point to the reality of Chapultepec being a revival castle. As a matter of fact, it was the only North American castle used to house a sovereign- the only one with that designation.

I had hoped to bring to the reader's attention the fact that these structures do not only exist in Europe, but the influence of castle revivalism reached into other countries as well. Anything you could do to help would be great. Thank you. C.Kent87 (talk) 04:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reply, actually I thought maybe you would agree with its inclusion in the article and make a remark on the talk page? There are two against it, but not many joining the discussion. If you have no interest, that is fine too. Thank you for taking time to read. C.Kent87 (talk) 04:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

That would be great! It's upsetting because there is one user who insists that it shouldn't be mentioned - yet many British revival castles are, and one German (Which shares a common architect w/ Chapultepec). It should be mentioned so that the sphere of influence is better documented. Thank you for your help. C.Kent87 (talk) 19:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

The Danube by Esztergom picture was taken from the top of the cathedral facing southwest: [2] The white building is the Archbishop's Palace, and the watertown church (Church of St. Ignatius of Loyola). Slovakia is on the top right.

The Danube by Visegrád was taken from halfway up the castle facing west. That huge bay you see was supposed to be part of the Bős-Nagymaros Dam, but the project was abandoned. Villy (talk) 11:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{adminhelp}}

I am requesting the increase of editing scope to include minor additions to semi protected articles. In this particular case, I wanted to add the category 'Psychiatric illnesses' to the article about Suicide.

Prior to my current activity on Wikisource, where I am extensively editing the Popular Science Monthly Project, I was very active here for a number of years will continue to be so.

In Wikisource, in addition to general proofreading, select proofread articles from the project will be recommended by academics to medical students interested in the history of the sciences in the 19th century. I am doing extensive categorization and interlinking of articles back to Wikipedia for additional reference to relevant topics, as well as related images uploaded to the Commons. Ineuw (talk) 17:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

You should be able to edit semi-protected pages at present, as far as I can see. What happens when you try to edit suicide? Algebraist 17:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Concur with above. Suicide is only semi-protected, so any WP:Autoconfirmed account should be able to edit it, which only means four days old and more than ten edits. Your account is (to put it mildly) well past those thresholds. What problem do you encounter when you try to edit Suicide?

Something to check: click "My preferences" at the top of the screen. Under "User profile", in the "Basic information" box, what does it say in the line "Member of groups"? JohnCD (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, it worked now. I added the necessary category. How can I avoid such issues in the future, after all I am very active on Wikisource, editing about 3,000 per month and constantly referencing, or updating categories in Wikipedia. Ineuw (talk) 18:52, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

There shouldn't be any problem, I don't understand why there was - I didn't do anything just now to clear one. I asked about the "Member of groups" line because your account is actually so old that I thought maybe it had never got automatically marked as "autoconfirmed" - as long as "Autoconfirmed users" appears on the "Member of groups" line, you should have no problem editing semi-protected pages. JohnCD (talk) 19:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

So many thanks. This is about being old. :-) I just saw the warning, so I thought that it won't let me do anything, and began this post. Afterwards, I tried it again and it's fine. Ineuw (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ineuw,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I would like to add information to the Robert S. Allen page from this article, written by Thomas E. Ricks. Never having done something like this, I don't know what the rules are about referencing a web article, and its incorporation. I would much appreciate if someone would point me to any relevant example which I can study. For the purposes of this post, please ignore my note about Wikisource as I monitor Wikipedia regularly. Thanks. Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 06:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ineuw. That does look like interesting information to add to the article. The best way to incorporate the article would be to summarize the claim it makes, then cite the article using the {{template:Cite news}} template inline next to it.

For example, you could add:

"According to John Earl Haynes, Harvey Klehr and Alexander Vassiliev in their 2009 book ''Spies: the rise and fall of the KGB in America'', Allen had done x, y, and z.<ref>{{cite news |title=Patton's Third Army deputy intel officer briefly was on the KGB's payroll |first=Thomas E |last=Ricks |newspaper=Foreign Policy |date=1 December 2010 |url=http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/12/01/pattons_third_army_deputy_intel_officer_briefly_was_on_the_kgbs_payroll |accessdate=2 December 2010}}</ref>". (I took the blank citation template from Template:Cite news and populated the fields myself.)

Then, if you add a {{reflist}} tag at the bottom of the article under the References section heading, the reference will show up in that section, linked from a footnote number automatically generated next to the sentence in the text.

Does that answer your question? Gonzonoir (talk) 09:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

It certainly does - Many thanks.! Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 09:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

1. I need to move this Public domain image to the Commons for use on Wikisource. Can this be accomplished without downloading and uploading again? Thanks in advance. Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 12:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

you will have to download it again and upload it to commons. it is not that difficult Gavin.perch (talk) 12:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

{{adminhelp}}

1. I was unable to remain logged in using the secure login. I switched to Wikisource and when I returned I was logged out agaian. Can you please tell me what I did wrong?
   1. Not an admin... but when you logged in, did you check the box "log me in globally"? Worm^TT 13:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

---

Re. picture - File:Brunton Thomas Lauder sig.jpg - I can move that from enwiki to Commons, using commons helper - I already have a login for that system, so probably easier for me to do it for you. Please wait.

Now done - picture is on commons under same name, Commons:File:Brunton Thomas Lauder sig.jpg. Cheers.  Chzz  ►  14:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

---

Re. login;

Ineuw, sometimes strange glitches happen. So if you have not already, please could you try the following;

• Clearing the 'cookies' on your browser
• Doing a full reboot (power off and on).
• Check your account is unified, with Special:MergeAccount

If you are still getting problems after trying that, please could you use a new {{helpme}} - and please give as many details as possible - ie operating system, version, when the problem first happened, does it occur if you visit other wiki such as German Wikipedia, wikibooks:Main_Page, and Wiktionary.

Also, if you have another browser, it would be helpful if you could try that, to tell us if the problem is specific to one browser.

If you are still having troubles, please do reinstate the helpme. I'll just remove it for now, whilst we wait for your response. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  14:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

As a reminder, when you add potentially controversial content about a living person (such as naming them an assassin) you need to provide a reliable source to support that claim, even if the claim is not the article specifically about that person. A source was easy to find in that persons article so I have added it to List of assassins, but in the future you should be be providing sources for the content you add as you add it to articles.Active Banana (^bananaphone 04:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I understand and will do so.Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 04:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I believe that these images should be moved to the commons File:Hubert Anson Newton (1830-1896).jpg and File:MaryCorinnaPutnamJacobi.jpg Both can be used on the Wikisource Author pages. Thank you.Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 01:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

both files can now be located on Commons. -^Gavin _Perch talk 03:22, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 03:28, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please contact me. 184.144.161.252 (talk) 02:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Hello!

Since your are listed in the participants of the WikiProject Hungary, it looks like you might be interested in articles related to Hungary and the Hungarians. Currently, the WikiProject Hungary is quite down with only a very limited active users, but I'd like to add some new impulse to it. So, I would like to invite you to take a look at this proposal, share your opinion and join a task force if you think you might be interested in it. If there are five or more applicants for a task force, it can be set up and by a cooperation of dedicated users we can further develop the task force related articles – at least give a boost to this small part of the project –, the task force itself and by so probably the whole WikiProject Hungary as well. If you have questions, ideas or thoughts you can add them on the talkpage of the proposal, here (I watchlsit your talkpage) or you can contact me directly on my talk page. Your words are very welcomed!

Thank you! Regards,

Thehoboclown (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

  Thanks for uploading File:Dangerous Crossing 1953 DVD Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your note. I placed a deletion request with an explanation on the file.Ineuw 20:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Edith Tudor Hart may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 25-november-2002-releases-soviet-intelligence-agents-and-suspected-agents.html|work=MI5 History > The Security Service at the National Archives|publisher=Crown Copyright|accessdate=16 February
• Centre For German And Austrian Exile Studies 6) ... Centre For German & Austrian Exile Studies)"]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Calixtlahuaca, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tenancingo and Otomi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

This Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons reviewed by a human contains numerous images already transferred. Is there a way to have these cleaned up to indicate that they are only on the Commons? — Ineuw talk 04:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Images already transferred to the Commons can be deleted locally via the F8 speedy deletion criterion. Since deleted pages are no longer categorized, that will empty the category as well. Huon (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

This doesn't answer my question. Information provided by Huon is available on the image's page. But it doesn't answer the question, how to process the deletion. Can I delete the image which meets the criteria listed in F8? If not, how does a use go about having an image deleted? — Ineuw talk 17:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

No! you cannot delete images by yourself until you have administrative right but you can always request for deletion by placing suitable CSD tag from Wikipedia:CSD#Files on the top of the image page which you want to be delete. CutestPenguin {talk • contribs} 17:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The relevant speedy deletion template to be added to the file page is {{db-f8}}. That will let admins know that the file should be deleted. Huon (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. However the file transfer process already added the {{now commons}} template which seems to be identical to {{db-f8}}. Please see my last move: File:1877_Santa_Monica_Pier.jpg. My concern is more about images that were moved by others some time ago, and just sit there tagged and not attended to. — Ineuw talk 19:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

That page was deleted on Wikipedia by Ronhjones an hour after you tagged it. It's no longer contained in any categories on Wikipedia. Since the admins performing the deletions are volunteers too, you can't really expect much faster restults. As an aside, it appears the file transfer process not only added {{now commons}} but also removed {{Copy to Commons}}, thereby removing the page from Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons reviewed by a human. Huon (talk) 21:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

My apologies, I am used to clicking on Wikipedia images displayed in an article, which immediately connects me to the commons page where the image is stored. That's what I was looking for. These images still show all the tags of Wikipedia and it got me confused. — Ineuw talk 22:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done   Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dachau concentration camp may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shoshone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bannock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am trying to repair an infobox which I copied out of an article and placed it in my User:Ineuw/sandbox and noted the detail on that age. — Ineuw talk 04:15, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

• Hi User:Ineuw I'm updated your sandbox with what I think you were trying to do - if it wasn't just shout for help again. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 08:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks. — Ineuw talk 14:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If you want to, please help by improving this weeks TAFI article Marie Serneholt. Any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I completed the translation of this article from Spanish Wikipedia, and would like to create the main namespace page. However, I haven't created an article here in about eight years, and I am not sure if there is anything else needs to be added for the initial display? — Ineuw talk 07:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your first article might help. First thing I noticed is that the article is unsourced. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Ineuw, thanks for creating Léonie d’Aunet!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

• Wikipedia Global list - 2009-05-05T22:46:44
• My Wikipedia Preferences - Registration time:2003-04-18T00:00:48

Looked through my Global list of sites' contributions and noticed that my join date for English Wikipedia is 2009-05-05 when in fact I joined on 2003-04-18. There may be several other dates listed for other sites that are off by a couple of years. Can someone responsible for managing the list apply accurate info. Thanks. — Ineuw talk 01:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

You have lived through any number of database changes that have occurred over the life of Wikipedia, so you should be aware that the Global List is just recording (as an initial date) when the already-existing users were registered into the new database. As an example, DavidWBrooks, another veteran editor, is also shown as enrolled in en-wiki by the Global List at the same time and date as you. This method of handling users who already existed would seem to be a choice made by the WMF software people at the time, so I'd consider it intentional rather than a mistake that can easily be corrected. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the explanation. — Ineuw talk 02:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Some minor grammatical errors in the Biography section (e.g "In the autumn of 1843 she acquainted Victor Hugo"). The other sections are fine. I suppose I should do it, but I'm in the middle of something else, so, drive-by tagging! WQUlrich (talk) 07:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@WQUlrich: Thanks. — Ineuw talk 07:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

RfC open there and social media addiction. Its quite basic linguistics but now the article is being suggested for deletion based on the linguistics. Any thoughts appreciated! --E.3 (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your recent articles, including Léonie d’Aunet, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your recent articles, including Léonie d’Aunet, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Autokey logos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, do you think that you could add entries to disappeared people lists. I have my hands full with editing and can only do so much at a time. I would be very thankful for any help that you could give me. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Davidgoodheart I'll try if you show me what is needed to be done. — Ineuw talk 20:11, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply