Voabo
I reverted your changes to angle and right triangle
editHi Voabo, and welcome to Wikipedia.
I just reverted all of your recent minor changes at angle, and most of those at right triangle as well (here is the change between before your edits and after mine), but I’m not trying to chase you away.
I’m not quite sure what you are getting at with these changes, as you didn’t leave any edit summaries. Taking out the paragraph breaks seems unnecessary (paragraph breaks help readers by splitting up long blobs of text into smaller pieces). A bunch of the added words seem superfluous (are already clearly implied), and other changes seem to my ear to be less idiomatic / more awkward than the previous text. I think both of these articles could use a lot of work, but more at the level of research/organization/figures/writing than at the word and sentence level necessarily.
If you think some of the changes I reverted were important improvements, feel free to start a discussion on Talk:Angle or Talk:Right triangle; I’m happy to have a conversation about any of them. Luckily Wikipedia saves the full history of every article, so other editors can see the changes from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angle&action=history or https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Right_triangle&action=history
Anyway, hope that didn’t seem unfriendly or aggressive. As I said, Wikipedia values newcomer contributions and I hope you’ll stick around and keep making changes where you notice something you think needs improvement.
All the best, jacobolus (t) 08:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
