I wasn't sure how to message you other than replying to a post. I am doing a newspaper article on the benefits that Wikipedia has had on education. I'd love to briefly interview you for the article. Do you have an email address or # I can reach you at?

edit

Hi BottleOfChocolateMilk. I wasn't sure how to message you other than replying to a post. I am doing a newspaper article on the benefits that Wikipedia has had on education. I'd love to briefly interview you for the article. Do you have an email address or # I can reach you at? Houseofwuss (talk) 09:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Go to their "User contributions", click "Tools" and then "Email this user". Biohistorian15 (talk) 14:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Failing NFCC#1 files

edit

From this discussion of antother file that fails NFCC#1, apparently you can just use {{rnfu}} on them and it adds a template, might be better than {{no permission}}. reppoptalk 05:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2024 United States Senate election in Maine. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. User:Namiba 16:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have made 4 reversions in a short period of time. That violates WP:3RR. If you revert yourself now and seek to build consensus, I won't press the issue further. If you do not revert yourself, you open yourself up to being potentially blocked for disruptive editing.--User:Namiba 16:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I see that you're engaging in disruptive editing on other articles as well. Please refrain and revert yourself as is required.--User:Namiba 16:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)\Reply
lol BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 16:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
You may not have noticed, the definition of what's correct varies from person to person. Do use this opportunity to analyze your actions in line with Wikipedia policy and practice your social skills (it makes things like this smoother and better for yourself and others). Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked for one month from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
You have been making false accusations of vandalism, edit warring, and failing to assume good faith of your fellow editors. Cullen328 (talk) 19:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply