Talk:ESPNews

Image:ESPNEWS.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I dont think that espnews is still using the red espnews logo anymore. dont you think you should replace it with the espnews hd one at the bottom?

ESPNEWS → ESPNews — The only reason it's currently capitalized is because the company does it that way. WP:MOSTM says to use standard English spelling and capitalization even is the trademark holder insists otherwise ("Time" instead of "TIME", "Xbox Live" instread of "Xbox LIVE", etc. The "ESPN" part is an abbreviation (for "Entertainment and Sports Programming Network"), the rest isn't. — TJ Spyke 16:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Any additional comments:

• If/when this does get moved, could an admin also move the various related articles: ESPNEWS Pregame (which looks like it doesn't even need an article), ESPNEWS Gametime and List of ESPNEWS personalities. TJ Spyke 16:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

{{move|ESPNews}}  Y Done Stwalkerster [ talk ] 18:12, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't "standard English spelling and capitalization" have been ESPN News? Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 23:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

they supposed to be still airing on the channel but what happened to them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.189.21.176 (talk) 19:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I hope all ad buyers rebel against buying time on this piece of crap as well as ESPN Assic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.126.253.66 (talk) 05:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ESPNews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060327112007/http://mediakit.espn.go.com/index.aspx?id=41 to http://mediakit.espn.go.com/index.aspx?id=41

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ESPNews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080503064951/http://xmradio.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=1560 to http://xmradio.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=1560

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I realize that Americans know next to nothing about hockey. I am a Canadian who has played hockey for 25 years and knows the game very well. Why do you not show shots on goal? Or do Americans think that means nothing? 216.26.192.92 (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply