Squares18

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Ron Greener article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. The JPS^{talk to me} 17:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

 Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Craig Liddle. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.darlington-fc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/PastPlayerDetail/0,,10339~669217,00.html in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Craig Liddle with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Craig Liddle with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Craig Liddle saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. Teiresias84 09:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 Thanks for experimenting with the page Manchester United F.C. on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - PeeJay 19:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Dereham Aces F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Julius Sahara 17:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Dereham Aces F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WebHamster 12:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC) Reply

A tag has been placed on Dereham Aces F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Julius Sahara (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shaun Reay, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Sean Reay. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Shaun Reay. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CIreland (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Please keep in mind that "(loan)" should not be in italics in players' infoboxes, which has been set by the MoS for players. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Dereham Aces F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Julius Sahara (talk) 13:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Dereham Aces F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Julius Sahara (talk) 16:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Manchester United F.C. worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LeaveSleaves (talk) 15:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Colin Sinclair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds 14:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please stop removing the new "Super-collapse templates" from the football manager pages. These were introduced after a discussion at WP:FOOTBALL — see [1] — to avoid the clutter that is growing at the foot of many such pages. Thankyou. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 04:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I was wondering why you're removing wikilinks to managers without articles on football managers templates? They're notable and having a wikilink should help encourage the creation of their article. Not having a link gives the idea that they're non-notable, which doesn't seem to be the case. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 06:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Ryan Giggs, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Unless you have a reliable source that says the club numbers might be changed, do not add 'TBA' to the players current numbers. Ɔrassic ^(talk) 14:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cristiano Ronaldo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Once more, unless you have a source, do not change their numbers. Ɔrassic ^(talk) 14:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Danny Welbeck (footballer), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Welbeck (footballer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ɔrassic ^(talk) 16:46, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please do not create articles on footballers who have never played a match in a fully professional league, as they will be deleted. Thanks, пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. It may not have been your intention, but one of your recent edits removed the Persondata from the article Arthur Albiston. Your other edits to the article were good, so I assume that either you removed the Persondata by accident or you weren't aware of what it was for. You can have a read of Wikipedia:Persondata if you would like to find out more. Regards & happy editing. --Jameboy (talk) 17:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent contributions to this article are not helpful. Please stop. I have reverted your edits for a reason. If you do not understand the reason, please send me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – PeeJay 18:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Again, please stop. Bobby Charlton, Matt Busby and Alex Ferguson have not been Knights for their entire lives, so to refer to them constantly as "Sir" is incorrect. Furthermore, your other changes to the article are against the Manual of Style. – PeeJay 22:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, now you're just being disruptive. If you persist, I will report you to an admin for vandalism. – PeeJay 23:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to [[::Template:Manchester United F.C. squad]], did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Latics (talk) 23:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Jason Bradley, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Bradley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bettia (rawr!) 08:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Bettia (rawr!) 08:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please don't remove sections of the infobox from Corey Barnes. Regards, GiantSnowman 16:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did in Corey Barnes, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 17:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have redirect the article you created last night at Nathan Porritt (footballer) to Nathan Porritt, which has been in existence since September 2006! GiantSnowman 09:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Squares18! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 721 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Stewart Davies - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Ron Greener - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Craig Liddle - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Kevan Smith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Mick Tait - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. As you edited Darlington-related pages in the recent past, your comments are invited at Talk:Darlington F.C.#A suggestion. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

As you neglected to offer your reasoning behind your edits and you refused to discuss your edits on the talkpage for the duration of the protection. When it automatically lifted, you edited again without discussing your changes. I have blocked you for 31 hours to prevent further disruption. Please make sure that you attempt to gain consensus for your edits, adhering to the various manual of styles. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Woody (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Stewart Davies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person due to lack of significant coverage from reliable sources therefore fails general notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- BigDom 17:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Stewart Davies, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Davies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- BigDom 19:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

As you have edited through IPs to edit war a version of the article without any discussion or consensus I have blocked you for 6 months. Please make sure that you attempt to gain consensus for your edits, adhering to the various manual of styles. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

If you wish to discuss the version of the article under one account and come to a consensus then please add an unblock template as shown above. I really hope that you will choose to discuss your edits. Woody (talk) 22:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply