Talk:Bulgars: Difference between revisions

 

:::However, the second and most often mistake is about the ethnic term [[Turk]]. Like in the comment of the editor above, some people mistake ''[[Turkic peoples]]'' with ''[[Turkish people]]''. They misunderstand the term ''Turk'' in the sense of Bulgarian history during the time and conflicts with Ottoman Empire and Turkey. As noted in the "Language" section, "''the Iranian theory is rooted in the periods of anti-Turkish sentiment in Bulgaria and is ideologically motivated''". Another misunderstanding is how Turks were [[Mongoloid]]s. There were found Mongoloid facial traits in some graves in Northern Bulgaria, but that does not mean that the Bulgars per se were Mongoloids. As a elite in minority perhaps some of them were, but maybe were absorbed Huns or some other tribes. Yet again, the facial traits are inclined to change, and only thing this indicates is their heterogeneity. However, recent genetic studies showed that Bulgarians, Volga Tatars, and Chuvash people, all historically related with the Bulgars, have negligible Asian-Altaic gene flow, while the Central Asian Turks extreme genetic heterogeneity. All this points that we cannot oversimplify things.--[[User:Crovata|Crovata]] ([[User talk:Crovata|talk]]) 22:33, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

 

== Untitled #4 ==

 

Sure manaf, WP is turkish hammam. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NewZealot|NewZealot]] ([[User talk:NewZealot|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NewZealot|contribs]]) 18:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->