D'Nealian: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
WolFox (talk | contribs)
m →‎Criticism: fixed citation 1 link
Line 11:
==Criticism==
[[File:D'Nealian Manusript.png|left|thumb|200px|An example of D'Nealian print writing.]]
D'Nealian has drawn criticism in many locations, as the addition of so-called "monkey tails"<ref>[http://www.mcnattlearningcenter.com/services/cog_trn/cog_trn/ph_04.html#What%20about%20monkey%20tails%20for%20transition? Peterson Handwriting Q & A]</ref> to manuscript ("print-style" writing) effectively adds a "third step" to how children are instructed to write. Moreover, a common issue is that D'Nealian is taught extremely early, to [[first grade|first]] and [[second grade]] students, many of whom are still learning the rudiments of print-style writing. At times, some school districts have abruptly changed their teaching of handwriting, possibly causing difficulties for students who must then adapt to a different style.
 
A research review by Steve Graham (1993/94) concludes that "there is no credible evidence" that D'Nealian makes a difference in children's handwriting, that D'Nealian creates practical problems for teachers (who must themselves learn the system and defend it to parents), and that it requires many young children to unlearn writing forms that they have already developed before formal instruction.<ref>Graham, Steve. (1993/94). "Are slanted manuscript alphabets superior to the traditional manuscript alphabet?" ''Childhood Education'' 71: 91–95.</ref>