Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine: Difference between revisions

 

Have the primary sources been removed now, or not? The template language still indicates they are there:<blockquote>For a list of review articles from the last 5 years at PubMed, click here (limit to free articles or to systematic reviews)</blockquote> Part of the problem was that the inclusion of "free articles" resulted in primary sources. If that has been addressed, the template text is wrong. If it hasn't been addressed, we still have a problem. The language (and the "or") is confusing ... is it reviews only? Is it reviews "or" free full text (which was the problem before that yielded primary sources). Please clarify the text. Also, since the template was not subst'd, will the corrected text show on articles, or does the bot need to fix them all? <groan> ... In addition to the problem of "who is minding the store" these days, since no one apparently noticed during the bot test that we were recommending primary sources on article talk pages. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 12:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)