Content deleted Content added
→‎Redirects !!: resp (sorry for the delay!)
→‎Ian Schrager: new section
Line 72:
::::Anything that alerts the uploader and sets a timetable for further action if not satisfactorily explained is fine. [[WP:PUF]] is designed for disputing claimed-as-free or self-work status, whereas [[WP:CSD]] is for images that are more obvious copyvio or for misuse of images that are claimed as nonfree. Twinkle has options to tag either of those two cases and automatically notify the uploader. By listing it at PUF or CSD, it queues the concern for others to see and process at certain deadlines if no explanation is provided and I forget to check back. For this editor, the pattern I saw affected ''all'' of his uploads, so there's obviously a misunderstanding there of image-use/licensing policy, was easy enough to file it in the usual queues for handling that (and let others also keep an eye on future edits). [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks#top|talk]]) 21:27, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
:::::Thanks for the detailed explanation, very helpful. Regards.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 21:38, 18 July 2012 (UTC)