Edwin Edwards: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
JeffLB (talk | contribs)
David Duke was not involved in neo Nazi activity in 1991 or later. Undid revision 442817109 by John Nevard (talk)
Line 151:
As the [[Louisiana gubernatorial election, 1991|1991 governor's race]] drew near, many of Edwards' friends encouraged him to abandon his planned comeback, believing that he had no chance to win. After Edwards' loss in 1987, a journalist for the defunct ''Shreveport Journal'' wrote that the only way Edwin Edwards could ever be elected again was to run against [[Adolf Hitler]]. Some considered these words to have a prophetic cast, since after the 1991 primary Edwards discovered his runoff opponent to be [[David Duke]], the highly controversial white supremacist politician, and former [[Ku Klux Klan]] leader. Edwards received 34 percent of the vote while Duke received 32 percent. Governor Roemer placed third, 80,000 votes behind Duke.
 
The runoff between a white supremacist and a former governor who was widely considered corrupt but was also minority-friendly, gained national attention. Support for Edwards grew in between the primary and the runoff. The [[interest group]], the [[Louisiana Coalition against Racism and Nazism]] appeared to challenge Duke, with its leadership including the longtime Treen supporter, [[Beth Rickey]], a member of the Republican State Central Committee from New Orleans. The coalition presented evidence that Duke was still involved in neo-Nazi activities.<ref>Patricia Sullivan, "Beth Rickey dies with an immune disorder and Crohn's disease," ''[[Washington Post]]'', September 16, 2009</ref>
 
Faced with the alternative of Duke, many who were otherwise lukewarm for Edwards found him looking ever better. Edwards found himself receiving endorsements from both Treen and Roemer; even Republican President [[George H.W. Bush|Bush]] urged that Edwards, the Democrat, was a better choice than Duke, a putative Republican. A very popular bumper sticker urging support for Edwards (although clearly not produced by his campaign) read "Vote For the Crook. It's Important."<ref>[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,974345,00.html "The No-Win Election"], TIME Magazine, Nov. 25, 1991</ref><ref>[http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=70UbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6U4EAAAAIBAJ&dq=vote%20for%20the%20crook%20it's%20important&pg=4928%2C3605557 "Voters to pick 'scoundrel' or ex-KKK Grand Wizard"], ''Milwaukee Sentinel'', Nov. 15, 1991</ref> Another read "Vote for the Lizard, not the [[Grand Wizard|Wizard]]." Edwards said that this would be his final term as governor and that he cared about leaving a good legacy, which made many hope that the corruption of his previous administrations would not be repeated. Edwards won by a wide margin. Continuing his artful use of humor to deflate an opponent, and referring to his considerable reputation as a Lothario, Edwards said of Duke, "The only thing we have in common is that we both have been wizards beneath the sheets." On Election Day, Edwards defeated Duke in a landslide, 61% to 39%, a margin of nearly 400,000 votes.