Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 47.
Line 243:
* Except for people who edit Scientology articles. They're obviously scum and Wikipedia should drive them all away. -- [[User:Antaeus Feldspar|Antaeus Feldspar]] ([[User talk:Antaeus Feldspar|talk]]) 12:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
:Why should we, as wikipedians, care if the paid editor is "performing inadequately in his role as paid representative"? That's between the editor in question and their client(s) - it's not like Wikipedia is paying or being paid. --&nbsp;'''[[User:M2Ys4U|M2Ys4U]]''' <sup>(<font color="green">[[User talk:M2Ys4U|talk]]</font>)</sup> 13:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 
: Your statement seems to contradict itself, or is overcomplexified. Your stating that a paid editor can edit anything except article's related to the person that pays them to do so. In other words: "Paid editors are allowed, as long as they are paid to improve rather then promote" ? [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contact me</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 13:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 
== Question 2 ==