Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Smash Hit/archive1: Difference between revisions

 

* What make citations 25 and 43 reliable and high-quality? Both seem to be blogs.

* What makes citation 8 reliable and high-quality? [https://web.archive.org/web/20140210150948/http://applenapps.com/about-us#.UvjrxrfP1qY Their about page] from around the time of the article's publication doesn't mention an editorial review process or similar.

* Points for pulling reviews from multiple languages; nice work!

* There are a handful of citations that need archive links for consistency. I used the[[toolforge:link-dispenser|Link Dispenser]] tool to pick them out. <small>(Hi Sohom!)</small>

* "{{darkred|travels forward at a constant speed}}" fails verification, though Starr does mention that the player moves on a "pre-set path".

* Citations 5 and 29: Don't use the {{tl|ill}} template in citation templates as it corrupts the metadata they generate.

* "{{gray|The game's music initially had 33 tracks}}" Source verifies the claim but also mentions that the tracks were "stitched together in different combinations", so they weren't really 33 distinct songs. I think this could be rephrased a little to include that detail.

* Which part of the source supports the claim "{{darkred|He was satisfied with the end result}}"?

* Citation 25: The site is down and redirects to something else, switch {{para|status|unfit}}.

* Citation 33: Switch {{para|status|dead}}.

* I conducted a dozen or so source–text integrity spot-checks, most of which came back clean except for a few which I've mentioned above.