Talk:Caddy (web server): Difference between revisions

::Citation needed for "having paid interest in the development of this article" -- this is a serious, unsubstantiated claim and it is false. The facts are this: this article is and was not promotional -- it was not requested to be written, there is and was no compensation of any kind for writing it, nor is there any financial or business benefit of having it. I do not own the Caddy project nor am I employed by the company that does own it -- I don't even live in the same country. I will be happy to disclose if there is ever a COI related to my contributions. [[User:Mwholt|m]] ([[User talk:Mwholt|talk]]) 23:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

:::@[[User:Moonythedwarf|Moonythedwarf]] In this instance, [[WP:PAID]] woudn't apply. @[[User:Mwholt|Mwholt]] seems to have created the Caddy project (could be wrong tho), which would mean the standard [[WP:COI]] would apply and not [[WP:PAID]]. Its an important distinction because the rules for paid editors are much stricter than an editor with an COI. [[User:Rlink2|Rlink2]] ([[User talk:Rlink2|talk]]) 13:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

:::@[[User:Rlink2|Rlink2]] see above. —[[User:Moonythedwarf|moonythedwarf]] 16:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

:Well I can tell you I have no such interest, as that's not how open source (FOSS) projects work. I do not own the Caddy project, nor am I employed by the company that owns the Caddy project. I'm not even in the same country. This article is and was not promotional -- it was not requested to be written, there is and was no compensation of any kind for writing it, nor is there any financial or business benefit of having it. It was purely an exercise in contributing to the Wikimedia commons for the public benefit. Do you have proof I am financially incentivized by this Wikipedia article? If not, I suggest removing the flag.