Content deleted Content added
GDallimore (talk | contribs) user appears not to have read WP:SYN |
GDallimore (talk | contribs) →Defending against patent trolls: links from source suggest quote was lifted from elsewhere. Original source seems more reliable anyway. nb still doesn't support suggestion that FAILURE to have threat provisions is a CAUSE of trolling |
||
Line 113:
* ''[[Patent infringement insurance#Patent infringement insurance|Patent infringement insurance]]''. Insurance is available to help protect companies from inadvertently infringing a third party's patents.
* ''[[Defensive patent aggregation]]'', the practice of purchasing patents or patent rights from patent holders so they don't end up in the hands of an individual or enterprise that can assert them. Increasingly aggregations are focused on purchasing patents and patent rights off the open market, or out of NPE assertion and litigation, which directly impact the businesses of the aggregation's members. The aggregator then provides members a broad license to everything it owns in exchange for an annual fixed-fee.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/11/24/in-fight-against-patent-trolls-a-new-arrow-in-the-quiver |title=In Fight Against Patent Trolls, A New Arrow in the Quiver |newspaper=[[Wall Street Journal]] |date=November 24, 2008 }}</ref>
* ''Action for unjustified threats''. In Australia,<ref name=
==See also==
| |||