Wikinews:Water cooler/miscellaneous

Refresh

Archive


17:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Article on Mitch Murray, Songwriter

I’m hoping someone can help me. My Wikipedia page, edited - I believe- by Derek Bullamore - has a very basic piece of incorrect information due to a mistaken entry in the London Gazette, nearly a month ago, when I was awarded a CBE in the Queen’s Birthday Honours.

I changed my legal name by Deed Poll in 1968 from Lionel Michael Stitcher to Mitch Murray, and my CBE honour is actually in the name of Mitch Murray, not my birth name. I have the original Change Of Name Deed and this was supplied to the Cabinet Office at the time I accepted the award. They tell me they supplied the correct information to the Gazette, but somehow the wrong information was printed.

I am quite happy to supply a copy of the Deed to whoever wishes to see it I will also arrange for the London Gazette to confirm the correct name, Mitch Murray CBE, which is now on file officially.

I understand why whoever edited my page did so, using the entry in the London Gazette, but the name Lionel Michael Stitcher has not been my legal name for 51 years, and I am happy to prove this and verify it with documentation and backup from the Gazette or the Cabinet Office.

I am finding the incorrect entry a complication to my professional ‘brand’ - much worse than the wrong ‘Spouse’ entry (we were actually Divorced in 1980).

Could someone please help me with this problem?

Many thanks

Mitch Murray CBE (honest)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.151.149.35 (talkcontribs) 19:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The appropriate first place to raise this concern is the talk page of the article in question. --Pi zero (talk) 19:56, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

21:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

20:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

15:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

On Somali journalism

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/22/journalism-can-get-you-killed-in-somalia-but-we-are-not-just-poster-children-for-desperationJustin (koavf)TCM 05:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

mw:Content translation

I'd thought about proposing if we could have the content translation extension enabled, though reading the tool's FAQ page, it seems to only be in development for Wikipedia, any maybe Wikivoyage. It's not clear if it would work out of the box on Wikinews. meta:Content translation group doesn't even consider translations between Wikinewses. Granted, this can be difficult to implement, just considering Wikinews publication policies. Though, I figure enabling something like this could bring life across Wikinewses. —mikemoral (talk · contribs) 03:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

From what I understand, that translation thing wouldn't be remotely suitable for Wikinews. There have been many efforts at general translation for Wikinews, all of which failed miserably. Translation between Wikinews projects can only be individual-article acts by individual Wikinewsies; which does happen, on various occasions. The incompatibilities between policies/philosophies of different Wikinews projects hugely complicate the problem of translation already made acute by the time frames and extreme quality-demands involved. --Pi zero (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Press pass!

Although I've reported on a number of events and have done loads of interviews, this weekend I will be covering the Texas Haunters Convention (in Dallas) as a BONAFIDE member of the press!! I've never used/had a genuine Press Pass before! Its going to be a cool event! --Bddpaux (talk) 15:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Great! Look forward to you reports. Have a good and productive time. Cheers, --SVTCobra 08:34, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

State of the project...

I made a good faith effort to contribute here, about a decade ago.

In Wikinews:Water cooler/policy/Archive/18#Compliance with Wikinews:Etiquette and the following section, I left my warning that I thought wikinews was a troubled project.

So, what is the state of the project? Was an attempt ever made to be more welcoming? Have contributions dried up?

What happened with Bureaucrat Brian McNeil? He seems to have retired. He warned me I would be banned if I kept asking questions. I thought my questions had been civil, pertinent, and appropriate. So, it was his bullying that drove me from this project.

My sympathy to him and his family, if he stopped contributing here due to ill-health. But, can I ask if the incivility I experienced was later more widely recognized? Did he end up losing some of his status bits? Geo Swan (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

We welcome folks who come here with positive attitudes, which in my experience is most of them; those who come here with disruptive intent, we invite to leave expeditiously, and often they claim en.wn is a hostile place though, of course, they brought with them the hostility they found here. Brianmc often dealt with the disruptive elements in order to let the rest of us get on with news production. --Pi zero (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yes, attempt to be more welcoming has been made. Some effort to this end are transparent and are detailed on the water cooler, and on my user page.
This does not exclude usage of phrases like "you royally screwed the start" (ref). They are a criticism of an action and not a person. I do not find them incivil and I am not sure why someone else would. Gryllida (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
I don't see a problem with Brian's comments. He may have been too harsh at times, but I am sure he had the best of intentions. I can understand some people get a little "picky" when they get told things they don't like, I don't blame them. But in my years here I never felt unwelcome; it was a permanent learning. I think we all won something. If people don't give Wikinews a chance, hardly they could get to understand its goal. --Diego Grez Cañete (talk) 03:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply