skip to main content
research-article

Improving search result summaries by using searcher behavior data

Published: 28 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Query-biased search result summaries, or "snippets", help users decide whether a result is relevant for their information need, and have become increasingly important for helping searchers with difficult or ambiguous search tasks. Previously published snippet generation algorithms have been primarily based on selecting document fragments most similar to the query, which does not take into account which parts of the document the searchers actually found useful. We present a new approach to improving result summaries by incorporating post-click searcher behavior data, such as mouse cursor movements and scrolling over the result documents. To achieve this aim, we develop a method for collecting behavioral data with precise association between searcher intent, document examination behavior, and the corresponding document fragments. In turn, this allows us to incorporate page examination behavior signals into a novel Behavior-Biased Snippet generation system (BeBS). By mining searcher examination data, BeBS infers document fragments of most interest to users, and combines this evidence with text-based features to select the most promising fragments for inclusion in the result summary. Our extensive experiments and analysis demonstrate that our method improves the quality of result summaries compared to existing state-of-the-art methods. We believe that this work opens a new direction for improving search result presentation, and we make available the code and the search behavior data used in this study to encourage further research in this area.

References

[1]
M. Ageev, Q. Guo, D. Lagun, and E. Agichtein. Find it if you can: A game for modeling different types of web search success using interaction data. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2011.
[2]
C. C. Aggarwal and S. Y. Philip. A general survey of privacy-preserving data mining models and algorithms. Springer, 2008.
[3]
S. Bird. Nltk: the natural language toolkit. In Proc. of the COLING/ACL., pages 69--72, 2006.
[4]
S. Blair-Goldensohn and K. McKeown. Integrating rhetorical-semantic relation models for query-focused summarization. In Proc. of DUC, 2006.
[5]
L. Breiman and L. Breiman. Bagging predictors. In Machine Learning, pages 123--140, 1996.
[6]
E. Brill, S. Dumais, and M. Banko. An analysis of the askmsr question-answering system. In Proc. of ACL, EMNLP '02, pages 257--264, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2002. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[7]
A. Broder. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 36(2):3--10, Sept. 2002.
[8]
G. Buscher, E. Cutrell, and M. R. Morris. What do you see when you're surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In Proc. of CHI, CHI '09, pages 21--30. ACM, 2009.
[9]
G. Buscher, A. Dengel, and L. van Elst. Query expansion using gaze-based feedback on the subdocument level. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2008.
[10]
G. Buscher, S. T. Dumais, and E. Cutrell. The good, the bad, and the random: an eye-tracking study of ad quality in web search. In Proc. of ACM SIGIR, SIGIR '10, pages 42--49, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[11]
G. Buscher, L. van Elst, and A. Dengel. Segment-level display time as implicit feedback: a comparison to eye tracking. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2009.
[12]
H. Dang, D. Kelly, and J. Lin. Overview of the trec 2007 question answering track. In Proc. of TREC-2007, 2007.
[13]
H. Daumé III and D. Marcu. Bayesian query-focused summarization. In Proc. of ACL, 2006.
[14]
S. Fisher and B. Roark. Query-focused summarization by supervised sentence ranking and skewed word distributions. In Proc. of DUC, 2006.
[15]
J. H. Friedman. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5):pp. 1189--1232, 2001.
[16]
J. Goldstein, M. Kantrowitz, V. Mittal, and J. Carbonell. Summarizing text documents: sentence selection and evaluation metrics. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 121--128. ACM, 1999.
[17]
Q. Guo and E. Agichtein. Exploring mouse movements for inferring query intent. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2008.
[18]
Q. Guo and E. Agichtein. Towards predicting web searcher gaze position from mouse movements. In Proc. of CHI. ACM, 2010.
[19]
Q. Guo and E. Agichtein. Beyond dwell time: estimating document relevance from cursor movements and other post-click searcher behavior. In Proc. of WWW, 2012.
[20]
Q. Guo, H. Jin, D. Lagun, S. Yuan, and E. Agichtein. Mining touch interaction data on mobile devices to predict web search result relevance. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2013.
[21]
S. Harabagiu and F. Lacatusu. Using topic themes for multi-document summarization. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 28(3):13:1--13:47, July 2010.
[22]
Y. Hijikata. Implicit user profiling for on demand relevance feedback. In Proc. of IUI, pages 198--205. ACM, 2004.
[23]
J. Huang, R. White, and G. Buscher. User see, user point: gaze and cursor alignment in web search. In Proc. of CHI. ACM, 2012.
[24]
J. Huang, R. W. White, G. Buscher, and K. Wang. Improving searcher models using mouse cursor activity. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2012.
[25]
J. Huang, R. W. White, and S. Dumais. No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search. In Proc. of CHI. ACM, 2011.
[26]
T. Kanungo, N. Ghamrawi, K. Y. Kim, and L. Wai. Web search result summarization: title selection algorithms and user satisfaction. In Proc. of CIKM, 2009.
[27]
T. Kanungo and D. Orr. Predicting the readability of short web summaries. In Proc. of WSDM, 2009.
[28]
T. Kiss and J. Strunk. Unsupervised multilingual sentence boundary detection. Computational Linguistics, 32(4):485--525, 2006.
[29]
J. Kupiec, J. Pedersen, and F. Chen. A trainable document summarizer. In Proc. of SIGIR, SIGIR '95, pages 68--73, New York, NY, USA, 1995. ACM.
[30]
X. Li, Y.-Y. Wang, and A. Acero. Learning query intent from regularized click graphs. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2008.
[31]
S. Liang, S. Devlin, and J. Tait. Evaluating web search result summaries. Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 96--106, 2006.
[32]
C.-Y. Lin. ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries. pages 74--81, Barcelona, Spain, July 2004. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[33]
D. Metzler and T. Kanungo. Machine learned sentence selection strategies for query-biased summarization. In SIGIR Learning to Rank Workshop, 2008.
[34]
F. Radlinski, M. Szummer, and N. Craswell. Inferring query intent from reformulations and clicks. In Proc. of WWW, 2010.
[35]
K. Rodden, X. Fu, A. Aula, and I. Spiro. Eye-mouse coordination patterns on web search results pages. In Proc. of CHI, 2008.
[36]
H. Takamura and M. Okumura. Text summarization model based on maximum coverage problem and its variant. In Proc. of the 12th Conf. of the European Chapter of the ACL, pages 781--789, 2009.
[37]
A. Tombros and M. Sanderson. Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 2--10. ACM, 1998.
[38]
J.-R. Wen, J.-Y. Nie, and H.-J. Zhang. Clustering user queries of a search engine. In Proc. of WWW, 2001.
[39]
R. W. White and G. Buscher. Text selections as implicit relevance feedback. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Behavior Sequence Transformer Applied on SERP Evaluation and Model Interpretation2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)10.1109/ICMLA55696.2022.00108(653-658)Online publication date: Dec-2022
  • (2021)Prediction of Online Purchasing Behavior of Cameras UsingWeb Search Logsウェブ検索ログからのカメラのオンライン購買行動予測Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence10.1527/tjsai.36-1_WI2-C36:1(WI2-C_1-10)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2021)The Analysis of Web Search Snippets Displaying User's Knowledge2021 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)10.1109/IMCOM51814.2021.9377354(1-8)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Improving search result summaries by using searcher behavior data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '13: Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
    July 2013
    1188 pages
    ISBN:9781450320344
    DOI:10.1145/2484028
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 July 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. mouse cursor movement
    2. result summary generation
    3. searcher behavior

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGIR '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGIR '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 73 of 366 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Behavior Sequence Transformer Applied on SERP Evaluation and Model Interpretation2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)10.1109/ICMLA55696.2022.00108(653-658)Online publication date: Dec-2022
    • (2021)Prediction of Online Purchasing Behavior of Cameras UsingWeb Search Logsウェブ検索ログからのカメラのオンライン購買行動予測Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence10.1527/tjsai.36-1_WI2-C36:1(WI2-C_1-10)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2021)The Analysis of Web Search Snippets Displaying User's Knowledge2021 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)10.1109/IMCOM51814.2021.9377354(1-8)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2021
    • (2020)Improving Search Snippets in Context-Aware Web Search ScenariosInformation Retrieval10.1007/978-3-030-56725-5_1(3-16)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2020
    • (2020)Analysing Port Community System Network EvolutionEuropean Port Cities in Transition10.1007/978-3-030-36464-9_10(169-186)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2020
    • (2018)User Intent, Behaviour, and Perceived Satisfaction in Product SearchProceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3159652.3159714(547-555)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2018
    • (2018)Document Summarization for Answering Non-Factoid QueriesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2017.275437330:1(15-28)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
    • (2017)Term-Mouse-Fixations as an Additional Indicator for Topical User Interests in Domain-Specific SearchProceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3121050.3121088(249-252)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
    • (2017)A Study of Snippet Length and InformativenessProceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3077136.3080824(135-144)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2017
    • (2017)User Satisfaction Prediction with Mouse Movement Information in Heterogeneous Search EnvironmentIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2017.273915129:11(2470-2483)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media