Skip to main content

Distribution Theories: Neoclassical

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 485 Accesses

Abstract

Whenever a theory becomes involved in controversy the question of what constitutes that theory itself becomes a contentious issue, and the neoclassical theory of distribution is no exception to that general rule. Some have seen marginal productivity as an essential feature of neoclassical theory. Others have regarded the aggregation of capital or an aggregate production function (even a function of the Cobb–Douglas form) as essential. Neoclassical distribution theory is viewed as general equilibrium theory by many but Friedman has defended the ‘Marshallian’ or partial equilibrium approach.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 1st edition, 1987. Edited by John Eatwell, Murray Milgate and Peter Newman

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.J., and F.H. Hahn. 1971. General Competitive Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B.. 1975. The economics of inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini, M., and R. Scazzieri. 1986. The foundations of economic knowledge. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C.J. 1975. Capital theory and the distribution of income. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champernowne, D.G. 1953. 4The production function and the theory of capital: A comment. Review of Economic Studies 21(2): 112–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R., P.A. Samuelson, and R.M. Solow. 1958. Linear programming and economic analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C.E. 1969. The neoclassical theory of production and distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F.H. 1982. The neo-Ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6(4): 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G.C. 1972. Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S.A. 1984. Growth distribution and prices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L.L. 1962. Rate of profit and income distribution in relation to the rate of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies 29: 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D.H. 1931. Wage grumbles. In Economic fragments, ed. D.H. Robertson. London: P.S. King & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.V. 1953. 4The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies 21(2): 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. 1960. The production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bliss, C. (1987). Distribution Theories: Neoclassical. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_105-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_105-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics