Abstract
Inverse Thomson scattering is a well-known radiation process that produces high-energy photons both in nature and in the laboratory. Nonlinear inverse Thomson scattering occurring inside an intense light field is a process which generates higher harmonic photons. In this paper, we theoretically show that the higher harmonic gamma-ray produced by nonlinear inverse Thomson scattering of circularly polarized light is a gamma-ray vortex, which means that it possesses a helical wave front and carries orbital angular momentum. Our work explains a recent experimental result regarding nonlinear inverse Thomson scattering that clearly shows an annular intensity distribution as a remarkable feature of a vortex beam. Our work implies that gamma-ray vortices should be produced in various situations in astrophysics in which high-energy electrons and intense circularly polarized light fields coexist. Nonlinear inverse Thomson scattering is a promising radiation process for realizing a gamma-ray vortex source based on currently available laser and accelerator technologies, which would be an indispensable tool for exploring gamma-ray vortex science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
An optical vortex is an electromagnetic wave with a phase that varies azimuthally along the direction of propagation1, 2. When an optical vortex beam is viewed in a plane transverse to the direction of propagation, an annular intensity profile is observed due to the phase singularity at the center of the beam. An important consequence of the optical vortex is that it possesses a phase term exp(inϕ) that carries discrete values nħ of orbital angular momentum (OAM) per photon, where n is an integer, ϕ is the azimuthal angle around the central axis of the propagation, and ħ is the Plank constant divided by 2π 1, 2. Fundamental and applied research on optical vortices using visible wavelength lasers is ongoing3. However, vortex beams are not limited to the visible spectrum, but have also been generated in the ultraviolet and X-ray energy range by a helically microbunched electron beam4, combination of synchrotron radiation and a spiral phase plate5, 6, or a helical undulator7,8,9. The interaction between the optical vortex carrying OAM and matter has been investigated, e.g. optical tweezers of microscopic particles10, 11, OAM transfer to a valence electron12, new selection rules of photoionization by an ultraviolet vortex beam13, and a strong dichroic effect induced by a X-ray vortex14.
The research of optical vortices has been extended to gamma-rays with the energy of E > 1 MeV. Gamma-ray vortices have a potential research opportunity as a probe of the structure of hadrons15. If gamma-ray vortices in the energy region of 1 < E < 30 MeV are generated, one may study the specific interaction between gamma-ray vortices and atomic nuclei via nuclear resonance fluorescence and photonuclear reactions whose reactions depends on the total angular momentum of an incoming gamma-ray. It has been proposed on theoretical grounds that gamma-ray vortices may be generated using inverse Thomson scattering between a high energy electron and an optical vortex laser16,17,18.
In this paper, we propose for the first time an alternative method to generate a gamma-ray vortex using nonlinear inverse Thomson scattering (NITS) of a high energy electron and an extremely intense circularly polarized laser. Inverse Thomson scattering is a process by which a high-energy electron converts a low energy photon to high-energy one19. Inverse Thomson scattered gamma-ray beams are available at many accelerator facilities around the world for the study of nuclear physics and various applications20,21,22,23,24,25,26. In many cases, a high power laser is used to generate an intense gamma-ray beam. When the peak power of a laser is sufficiently intense, a nonlinear effect of inverse Thomson scattering occurs. In the classical picture of NITS27, the transverse electron motion is induced by the intense laser field and higher harmonic photons are produced. Progress in laser physics has enabled the observation of NITS in the laboratory28, 29.
We theoretically investigate the electric field of the gamma-ray emitted from a relativistic electron inside the intense circularly polarized laser. We show that the n-th harmonic gamma-rays possess the phase term exp{i(n − 1)ϕ} and carry (n − 1)ħ OAM. In our method, the circularly polarized laser is crucial because the phase term arises from the transverse helical motion of the electron inside the circularly polarized laser field. A recent measurement of the annular profile of second harmonic X-rays of NITS using a circularly polarized laser29 strongly supports our theoretical prediction.
Methods–Derivation of theoretical equations
An electric field of gamma-rays emitted by NITS
We treat NITS in the context of classical electrodynamics as in the previous work27. Here, we assume that an intense circularly polarized laser is propagating along the −z direction. A coordinate system used in the calculation is shown in Fig. 1. Electron orbits, r e = (x e , y e , z e ), inside a circularly polarized laser field are helical, and are given by Eqs (19a–19c) in the ref. 27
with an independent variable η = z e + ct. Here, c is the speed of light, t is time, x 0, y 0, and z 0 are the initial position of the electron along the x, y, and z-axis, respectively, and r 1 is the radius of the helical motion given by
β 1 is given by
and β 1 c/(1 − β 1) is the drift velocity of the electron along the z-axis. Here, k 0 = 2π/λ 0 is the wave number of the laser field (where λ 0 is the wavelength of the laser), a 0 is the laser strength parameter described as \({a}_{0}=0.85\times {10}^{-9}{\lambda }_{0}(\mu {\rm{m}}){I}_{0}^{1/2}({\rm{W}}/{{\rm{cm}}}^{2})\), I 0 is the intensity of the laser, γ 0 and β 0 = v 0/c are the Lorentz factor and the normalized velocity of the initial electron (where v 0 is the electron velocity), respectively. Equations (1–3) correspond to the case in which the electron moves counterclockwise when the observer is facing the oncoming electron, which we call positive helicity.
The Fourier component of the electric field emitted by a single electron in an arbitrary orbit and normalized velocity can be calculated from the Lienard–Wiechert potentials (section 14.5 in the ref. 30):
where e is the elementary charge, ω and k = ω/c are the angular frequency and the wave number of the emitted photon, respectively, ε 0 is the permittivity of vacuum, R is the distance from the origin to the observation point, n is a unit vector pointing from the origin to the observation point, β = v/c (where v is the electron velocity vector inside the laser field), and r e is the electron orbit described in Eqs (1–3). Equation (6) is calculated in the spherical coordinates system (r, θ, ϕ) and unit vectors (e r , e θ , e ϕ ) by using following relations27:
Each component of the electric field in the spherical coordinate system can be expressed as follows:
where, η 0 = N 0 λ 0/2 (where N 0 is the number of the periods of the laser field interacting with the electron), which corresponds to half of the laser pulse length.
The electric fields of Eqs (10) and (11) can be calculated by inserting Eqs (1–3), and using the following relations:
and formulas:
Here, σ = k 0 η − ϕ, J n (p) and \({J}_{n}^{^{\prime} }(p)\) are the Bessel function of the first kind and its derivative, respectively. The result will be
where,
and n is the integer and related to the harmonic number of the emitted gamma-ray (n ≥ 1).
To show the phase structure in the transverse plane, we express the electric field in the orthogonal coordinate system, as expressed below:
Thus, the electric field is
Here, the electric field is expressed by the complex orthogonal unit vectors \({{\bf{e}}}_{\pm }\equiv ({{\bf{e}}}_{x}\pm i{{\bf{e}}}_{y})/\sqrt{2}\) whose helicities of the circularly polarized electric fields of the gamma-rays are positive and negative, respectively. In the paraxial approximation (\(\theta \ll 1\)) the longitudinal component of the electric field along the z-axis is much smaller than the transverse component. With the assumption of (x 0, y 0, z 0) = (0, 0, 0) and \(R\simeq z\) (where z is the distance along the z-axis from the origin to the observation point), the electric field can be expressed as follows:
Degree of circular polarization of gamma-rays
The degree of circular polarization of the gamma-rays can be represented by the Stokes parameter, S 3/S 0, which is expressed as (section 7.2 in the ref. 30)
When the following inequality is satisfied,
the Bessel function of the first kind and its derivative can be expressed as
Therefore, in the paraxial approximation (\(\theta \ll 1\)) Eq. (28) will be
Here,
Therefore, when Eq. (29) is satisfied, the Stokes parameter does not depend on the harmonic number, n.
Energy, transverse energy distribution, and the number of photons of gamma-ray vortices
Equations (20) and (21) indicate that the function, \(\sin (\overline{k}{\eta }_{0})/(\bar{k}{\eta }_{0})\), is sharply peaked at wave number given by \(\overline{k}=0\) and the energy bandwidth of n-th harmonic gamma-rays is given by Δω/ω n = 1/(nN 0)27. The energy at the maximum intensity of the n-th harmonic gamma-ray can be calculated by Eq. (22), when \(\overline{k}=0\),
Here, ω 0(=k 0 c) is the angular frequency of the initial circularly polarized laser.
The radiation energy per angular frequency and solid angle is expressed as (section 14.5 in the ref. 30)
here, dΩ = dϕdθ sinθ. The number of n-th harmonic photons emitted per second toward the scattering angle between θ 1 and θ 2 can be approximately calculated from Eq. (35), when \(\overline{k}=0\),
where N e is the number of the electrons interacting with the laser per second. Here, we take into account the bandwidth of scattered photons arising from the finite laser pulse length, Δω/ω n = 1/(nN 0)27. Even if a single cycle laser is used (N 0 = 1), the gamma-ray vortices may be generated. However, the number of photons is proportional to N 0 and the bandwidth of gamma-ray energy is inversely proportional to N 0. Therefore, a long cycle laser is more useful than a single cycle laser for a nuclear physics experiment, which desires an intense gamma-ray source with a narrow energy bandwidth.
Results
Spatial energy distribution of gamma-ray vortices
Figure 2 shows the spatial energy distribution in the transverse plane for each harmonic number calculated using Eq. (35). Here, we used following parameters: γ 0 = 2000, λ 0 = 1.0 μm, a 0 = 1.0, and N 0 = 500. Most photons generated by NITS are concentrated near the central axis. A single maximum in the distribution is observed in the fundamental harmonic gamma-rays (Fig. 2(a)). An annular shape and with zero intensity at the z-axis occurs only for the higher harmonics (Fig. 2(b,c)). We stress that this feature in the higher harmonics is a typical characteristics of a vortex beam.
Relation between the polarization state and OAM
Equation (27) shows that the electric field of the gamma-ray is an elliptically polarized wave, which can be decomposed into circularly polarized components with positive and negative helicities. More importantly, Eq. (27) shows that the phase term is characterized by the unit vector representing the helicity of circularly polarized gamma-rays. The higher harmonics (n ≥ 2) of the positive helicity component possess a helical phase structure represented by the phase term exp{i(n − 1)ϕ}, and all harmonics of the negative helicity component possess the phase term exp{i(n + 1)ϕ}.
The degree of circular polarization of the gamma-rays can be represented by the Stokes parameter (section 7.2 in the ref. 30). Figure 3 shows the spatial distribution of the Stokes parameter calculated by Eq. (28). We used the parameters of γ 0 = 2000, λ 0 = 1.0 μm, a 0 = 1.0, N 0 = 500, and n = 2. Equation (29) is valid when the following conditions are satisfied, 0 ≤ γ 0 θ ≤ 3, 0 ≤ a 0 ≤ 1, and n ≤ 10, respectively. Therefore, the contour of the Stokes parameter is similar up to the tenth harmonics. The Stokes parameters of S 3/S 0 = 1, −1, and 0 indicate 100% circular polarization with positive and negative helicity, and 100% linear polarization, respectively. We found that in the scattering angle of θ < 0.6/γ 0, the degree of the circular polarization of the gamma-rays is more than 90% of circular polarization with positive helicity, which coincides with the electron motion. The degree of circular polarization decreases as the scattering angle increases. The polarization changes from circular to linear polarization near the angle of θ = 1.2/γ 0. The polarization again changes to more than 90% of circular polarization with negative helicity at a greater scattering angle of 2.40/γ 0 < θ. As a result, only higher harmonic gamma-rays emitted in the scattering angle of θ < 0.6/γ 0 should carry (n − 1)ħ OAM. The helicity of the circular polarization becomes negative at large scattering angles. Gamma-rays emitted in the scattering angle of 2.40/γ 0 < θ carry (n + 1)ħ OAM.
The generation of vortex beams by NITS is physically similar to helical undulator radiation, where the trajectory of an electron inside a magnetic field is helical. The generation of vortex beams from helical undulators was theoretically proposed7 and experimentally verified later9. The phase term, exp{i(n − 1)ϕ}, can be seen in the complex amplitude of an emitted photon and the annular intensity distribution was also observed only in the higher harmonics (Eq. (6) and Fig. 2 in the ref. 7). Our theoretical results are consistent with their results.
Expected intensity and energy
We estimate the expected number of photons and their energy for a gamma-ray vortex source based on NITS using currently available laser and accelerator technology. The calculated results for the number of photons and the energy of NITS gamma-ray vortices are shown in Fig. 4(a,b), respectively. The calculation parameters are: γ 0 = 2000, λ 0 = 1.0 μm, a 0 = 1.0, N 0 = 500, and N e = 109 electrons/s. These parameters are readily available at modern mid-energy scale accelerator facilities with high power lasers. It is possible to obtain 109 photons/s at the fundamental component, with more than 90% circular polarization of positive helicity and with energies of 11–13 MeV, but not carrying any OAM. In contrast, the second harmonic contains 2 × 108 photons/s with energies of 21–26 MeV (Fig. 4(b)) and carries 1ħ OAM. At the large angles of 2.40/γ 0 < θ, these photons predominantly possess more than 90% of circular polarization with negative helicity, and carry (n + 1)ħ OAM; however, the number of the photons is smaller by one order of magnitude than that with positive helicity up to the third harmonics.
It is well known that in inverse Thomson scattering, the energy of the emitted gamma-rays depends on the electron beam energy, the wavelength of the laser, and the scattering angle. However, in the case of NITS, it also depends on the laser strength parameter, a 0. The energy of the second harmonic gamma-ray as a function of the scattering angle for each laser strength parameter can be calculated by Eq. (34) and is shown in Fig. 4(b). The gamma-ray energy decreases as the laser strength parameter in the region a 0 > 1 increases due to a decrease in the longitudinal electron velocity and a growth of the transverse helical motion. The energy of the emitted gamma rays can be tuned by changing the electron beam energy and the wavelength of the laser.
Discussion
Thomson scattering theory is valid when the scattered photon energy is much lower than the electron energy, i.e., \(\hslash {\omega }_{n}\ll {\gamma }_{0}{m}_{e}{c}^{2}\) as described in the ref. 27, where m e is the electron energy at rest. Under the condition with λ 0 = 1 μm, a 0 = 1, n = 2, and θ = 0, this implies \({\gamma }_{0}\ll 5\times {10}^{4}\) and ħω 2 ≪ 25 GeV. Therefore, our calculation result is valid for gamma-ray vortex generation in the MeV energy range.
It was proposed that gamma ray vortices with energies greater than MeV could be generated, using inverse Thomson scattering between an electron and an optical vortex laser16. In this method, the OAM value of the vortex laser is considered to be conserved in the small scattering angle of the order of \(1/{\gamma }_{0}^{2}\) as described in the ref. 16. Only a small fraction of the gamma-ray photons scatter into this small angle and many others scatter in the angle of 1/γ 0 in inverse Thomson scattering. In contrast, in the our proposed method, the gamma ray vortices can be generated into the angle in the order of 1/γ 0. Therefore it seems that the generation efficiency of the present method is approximately higher by the factor of γ 0 than that of the vortex laser method.
An important result in the present study is that the annular intensity distribution of the higher harmonic gamma-rays is generated by NITS as shown in Fig. 2. NITS using a relativistic electron beam and a laser has been experimentally investigated at accelerator facilities28, 29. Recently, NITS was demonstrated using a circularly polarized laser with a laser strength parameter of a 0 = 0.6 at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)29. The results showed an annular shape of the intensity distribution for the second harmonics of scattered X-rays with an energy of 13 keV (Fig. 8 in the ref. 29), although it was stated that this shape originated from a helical motion of the electron. However, in the present study, we can reproduce the annular shape of the second harmonic X-rays by using parameters of the electron accelerator and the laser at BNL as shown in Fig. 5. This indicates that the measured annular profile resulted from X-ray vortices generated by NITS.
Gamma-ray vortices for the study of nuclear physics
Photons with non-zero OAM and energies larger than 1 MeV will open a new frontier in nuclear physics and nuclear astrophysics. The interaction between atomic nuclei and photons with energies of 1 < E < 30 MeV are dominated by nuclear resonances fluorescence and photo nuclear reactions. These reactions can be understood by a two-step model. First, an incident photon is absorbed by a nucleus and thereby the nucleus is exited. If the excitation energy is lower than particle separation threshold, the excited nucleus subsequently decays out through nuclear resonances fluorescence with the emission of a gamma-ray or a cascade of gamma-rays. If the excited energy is higher than the particle threshold, the nucleus can decay out to a residual nucleus with the emission of a particle such as neutron or proton (photo nuclear reaction). The spin and parity of the excited nucleus populated by the absorption of a photon is limited by the conservation laws of angular momentum31, namely, |I i − I p | ≤ I f ≤ |I i + I p |, where I i and I f are the spin of the initial state and the exited state in the nucleus, respectively, and I p is the total angular momentum of the incident photon. It is well known that, for the photon-nucleus interactions, giant dipole resonances (GDRs) play the dominant role at 10–30 MeV. The GDRs are commonly observed in most nuclei except for proton. Because the GDRs should be excited by electric-dipole (E1) transitions, the spin and parity of GDRs in J π = 0+ even-even nuclei is J π = 1−. If a gamma-ray vortex whose total angular momentum is higher than or equal to 2ħ induces on an J π = 0+ even-even nucleus, the GDR excitation should be forbidden because of the conservation laws of angular momentum as discussed above. Therefore, the photonuclear reaction cross section should be drastically changed at least in the GDR region. Finally, we would like to point out that gamma-rays play also an important role in stellar nucleosynthesis, such as the γ-process in supernova explosions, in which some rare isotopes are produced by successive photodisintegration reactions32. High-energy gamma ray vortices may be generated in stellar environments in which high-energy electrons and intense circularly polarized electromagnetic fields coexist, for example, the vicinity of magnetized neutron stars33,34,35 or magnetohydrodynamic jet supernova explosions36. If gamma-ray vortex will available in laboratories, it will be a new probe to study nuclear physics and nuclear astrophysics.
References
Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. C. & Woerdman, J. P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).
Allen, L., Padgett, M. & Babiker, M. IV The orbital angular momentum of light. Progress in Optics 39, 291–372 (1999).
Yao, A. M. & Padgett, M. J. Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications. Adv. Opt. Photon. 3, 161–204 (2011).
Hemsing, E. et al. Coherent optical vortices from relativistic electron beams. Nature Physics 9, 549–553 (2013).
Peele, A. G. et al. Observation of an x-ray vortex. Opt. Lett. 27, 1752–1754 (2002).
Peele, A. G. & Nugent, K. A. X-ray vortex beams: A theoretical analysis. Opt. Express 11, 2315–2322 (2003).
Sasaki, S. & McNulty, I. Proposal for Generating Brilliant X-Ray Beams Carrying Orbital Angular Momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 124801 (2008).
Afanasev, A. & Mikhailichenko, A. On Generation of Photons Carrying Orbital Angular Momentum in the Helical Undulator. arXiv 1109, 1603–1–12 (2011).
Bahrdt, J. et al. First Observation of Photons Carrying Orbital Angular Momentum in Undulator Radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 034801 (2013).
O’Neil, A. T., MacVicar, I., Allen, L. & Padgett, M. J. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Nature of the Orbital Angular Momentum of a Light Beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 053601 (2002).
Simpson, N. B., Dholakia, K., Allen, L. & Padgett, M. J. Mechanical equivalence of spin and orbital angular momentum of light: an optical spanner. Opt. Lett. 22, 52–54 (1997).
Schmiegelow, C. T. et al. Transfer of optical orbital angular momentum to a bound electron. Nature Communications 7, 12998 (2016).
Picón, A. et al. Photoionization with orbital angular momentum beams. Opt. Express 18, 3660–3671 (2010).
van Veenendaal, M. & McNulty, I. Prediction of Strong Dichroism Induced by X Rays Carrying Orbital Momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 157401 (2007).
Ivanov, I. P. Colliding particles carrying nonzero orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. D 83, 093001 (2011).
Jentschura, U. D. & Serbo, V. G. Generation of High-Energy Photons with Large Orbital Angular Momentum by Compton Backscattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 013001 (2011).
Jentschura, U. D. & Serbo, V. G. Compton upconversion of twisted photons: backscattering of particles with non-planar wave functions. The European Physical Journal C 71, 1571 (2011).
Petrillo, V., Dattoli, G., Drebot, I. & Nguyen, F. Compton Scattered X-Gamma Rays with Orbital Momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123903 (2016).
Rybicki, G. B. & Lightman, A. P. Radiative Processes in Astrophysics (Wiley-VCH, 1985), first edn.
Weller, H. R. et al. Research opportunities at the upgraded HIγS facility. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 62, 257–303 (2009).
Miyamoto, S. et al. Laser Compton back-scattering gamma-ray beamline on NewSUBARU. Radiation Measurements 41, S179–S185 (2006).
Taira, Y. et al. Generation of energy-tunable and ultra-short-pulse gamma rays via inverse Compton scattering in an electron storage ring. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 652, 696–700 (2011).
Kawase, K. et al. MeV γ-ray generation from backward Compton scattering at SPring-8. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 592, 154–161 (2008).
Bocquet, J. P. et al. GRAAL: a polarized γ-ray beam at ESRF. Nuclear Physics A 622, 124c–129c (1997).
Balabanski, D. L., The ELI-NP Science Team. Physics studies with brilliant narrow-width γ-beams at the new ELI-NP Facility. Pramana 83, 713–718 (2014).
Chaikovska, I. et al. High flux circularly polarized gamma beam factory: coupling a Fabry-Perot optical cavity with an electron storage ring. Scientific Reports 6, 36569–1–9 (2016).
Esarey, E., Ride, S. K. & Sprangle, P. Nonlinear Thomson scattering of intense laser pulses from beams and plasmas. Phys. Rev. E 48, 3003–3021 (1993).
Bula, C. et al. Observation of Nonlinear Effects in Compton Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3116–3119 (1996).
Sakai, Y. et al. Observation of redshifting and harmonic radiation in inverse Compton scattering. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 060702 (2015).
Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics third edn. (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1999).
Landau, L. & Lifshitz, E. Quantum Mechanics third edn. (Pergamon Press, 1965).
Hayakawa, T. et al. Evidence for Nucleosynthesis in the Supernova γ Process: Universal Scaling for p Nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 161102 (2004).
Hartemann, F. V. et al. High-intensity scattering processes of relativistic electrons in vacuum and their relevance to high-energy astrophysics. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 127, 347–356 (2000).
Stewart, P. Non-linear Compton and inverse Compton effect. Astrophysics and Space Science 18, 377–386 (1972).
Arons, J. Nonlinear inverse Comption radiation and the circular polarization of diffuse radiation from the Crab Nebula. The Astrophysical Journal 177, 395–410 (1972).
Takiwaki, T., Kotake, K. & Sato, K. Special relativistic simulations of magnetically dominated jets in collapsing massive stars. The Astrophysical Journal 691, 1360–1379 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Prof M. Hosaka at Nagoya Univeristy, Dr T. Kaneyasu at SAGA Light Source, Prof. K. Ohmi at KEK, and Dr Y. Sakai at University of California at Los Angeles for their helpful discussions. Yoshitaka Taira is grateful for the helpful comments to this paper given by Dr Joseph Grames at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. This work was supported by JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships, and a part of this work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26286081 and 15H03665.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.T. contributed the derivation of the analytical expressions and calculations. T.H. contributed the section on gamma-ray vortices for the study of nuclear physics. M.K. was responsible for the basic idea and checked the analytical expressions. The manuscript was reviewed by all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Taira, Y., Hayakawa, T. & Katoh, M. Gamma-ray vortices from nonlinear inverse Thomson scattering of circularly polarized light. Sci Rep 7, 5018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05187-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05187-2
This article is cited by
-
Advances in laser-plasma interactions using intense vortex laser beams
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2024)
-
Bright X/\(\gamma\)-ray emission and lepton pair production by strong laser fields: a review
Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics (2024)
-
Production of polarized particle beams via ultraintense laser pulses
Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics (2022)
-
The emission of γ-Ray beams with orbital angular momentum in laser-driven micro-channel plasma target
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Compton Scattering of Hermite Gaussian Wave γ Ray
Scientific Reports (2019)