Abstract
Around a million quasars have been catalogued in the Universe by probing deeper and using new methods for discovery. However, the hardest ones to find seem to be the rarest and brightest specimens. Here we study the properties of the most luminous of all quasars found so far. These have been overlooked until recently, which demonstrates that modern all-sky surveys have much to reveal. The black hole in this quasar accretes around one solar mass per day onto an existing mass of ∼17 billion solar masses. In this process, the accretion disk alone releases a radiative energy of 2 × 1041 W. If the quasar is not strongly gravitationally lensed, then its broad-line region is expected to have the largest physical and angular diameter occurring in the Universe and this will allow the Very Large Telescope Interferometer to image its rotation and measure its black-hole mass directly. This will be an important test for broad-line region size–luminosity relationships, whose extrapolation has underpinned common black-hole mass estimates at high redshift.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data from Data Release 3 (DR3) of the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission are publicly available (https://gea.esac.esa.int/archive/). NASA ATLAS data are available from https://fallingstar-data.com/forcedphot/. The SkyMapper Southern Survey data are available from https://skymapper.anu.edu.au/ (https://doi.org/10.25914/5f14eded2d116). The raw spectrum and calibration files from the ESO/VLT are available in the ESO archive at http://archive.eso.org/. A reduced spectrum is available from the authors on reasonable request.
Code availability
The spectral fitting code and the quasar continuum-fitting code were written by S.L. in Python and are publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/samlaihei/PyQSpecFit (ref. 38) and https://github.com/samlaihei/BADFit (ref. 48).
References
Schmidt, M. 3C 273: a star-like object with large red-shift. Nature 197, 1040 (1963).
Hoyle, F. & Fowler, W. A. Nature of strong radio sources. Nature 197, 533–535 (1963).
Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. Astron. Astrophys. 24, 337–355 (1973).
Soltan, A. Masses of quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 200, 115–122 (1982).
Boyle, B. J. et al. The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey – I. The optical luminosity function of quasi-stellar objects. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 317, 1014–1022 (2000).
Richards, G. T. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasar survey: quasar luminosity function from Data Release 3. Astron. J. 131, 2766–2787 (2006).
Tucci, M. & Volonteri, M. Constraining supermassive black hole evolution through the continuity equation. Astron. Astrophys. 600, A64 (2017).
Bardeen, J. M. Kerr metric black holes. Nature 226, 64–65 (1970).
Davis, S. W. & Laor, A. The radiative efficiency of accretion flows in individual active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 728, 98 (2011).
Dexter, J. & Agol, E. Quasar accretion disks are strongly inhomogeneous. Astrophys. J. Lett. 727, L24 (2011).
Slone, O. & Netzer, H. The effects of disc winds on the spectrum and black hole growth rate of active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 656–664 (2012).
Campitiello, S., Ghisellini, G., Sbarrato, T. & Calderone, G. How to constrain mass and spin of supermassive black holes through their disk emission. Astron. Astrophys. 612, A59 (2018).
Starkey, D. A., Huang, J., Horne, K. & Lin, D. N. C. Rimmed and rippled accretion disc models to explain AGN continuum lags. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 519, 2754–2768 (2023).
Lai, S., Wolf, C., Onken, C. A. & Bian, F. Characterising SMSS J2157–3602, the most luminous known quasar, with accretion disc models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 3682–3698 (2023).
Flesch, E. W. Identification confusion and blending concealment in the SDSS-DR16 quasar catalogues – 40 new quasars and 82 false quasars identified. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 504, 621–635 (2021).
Wu, X.-B. et al. An ultraluminous quasar with a twelve-billion-solar-mass black hole at redshift 6.30. Nature 518, 512–515 (2015).
Eilers, A.-C. et al. EIGER. III. JWST/NIRCam observations of the ultraluminous high-redshift quasar J0100+2802. Astrophys. J. 950, 68 (2023).
Wolf, C. et al. Discovery of the most ultra-luminous QSO using Gaia, SkyMapper, and WISE. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 35, e024 (2018).
Volonteri, M. Formation of supermassive black holes. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 18, 279–315 (2010).
Volonteri, M., Silk, J. & Dubus, G. The case for supercritical accretion onto massive black holes at high redshift. Astrophys. J. 804, 148 (2015).
Amarantidis, S. et al. The first supermassive black holes: indications from models for future observations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 2694–2709 (2019).
Zubovas, K. & King, A. High-redshift SMBHs can grow from stellar-mass seeds via chaotic accretion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 4289–4297 (2021).
Onken, C. A. et al. AllBRICQS: the All-sky BRIght, Complete Quasar Survey. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 40, e010 (2023).
Walsh, D., Carswell, R. F. & Weymann, R. J. 0957+561 A, B: twin quasistellar objects or gravitational lens? Nature 279, 381–384 (1979).
Lemon, C. et al. Gravitationally lensed quasars in Gaia – IV. 150 new lenses, quasar pairs, and projected quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520, 3305–3328 (2023).
Irwin, M. J., Ibata, R. A., Lewis, G. F. & Totten, E. J. APM 08279+5255: an ultraluminous broad absorption line quasar at a redshift z = 3.87. Astrophys. J. 505, 529–535 (1998).
Patnaik, A. R., Browne, I. W. A., Walsh, D., Chaffee, F. H. & Foltz, C. B. B 1422+231: a new gravitationally lensed system at z = 3.62. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 259, 1P–4 (1992).
Egami, E. et al. APM 08279+5255: Keck near- and mid-infrared high-resolution imaging. Astrophys. J. 535, 561–574 (2000).
Chen, Y.-C. et al. Varstrometry for off-nucleus and dual subkiloparsec AGN (VODKA): Hubble Space Telescope discovers double quasars. Astrophys. J. 925, 162 (2022).
Chen, H.-W. et al. An empirical characterization of extended cool gas around galaxies using Mg II absorption features. Astrophys. J. 714, 1521–1541 (2010).
Mason, C. A. et al. Correcting the z ∼ 8 galaxy luminosity function for gravitational lensing magnification bias. Astrophys. J. 805, 79 (2015).
Yue, M., Fan, X., Yang, J. & Wang, F. Revisiting the lensed fraction of high-redshift quasars. Astrophys. J. 925, 169 (2022).
Tonry, J. L. et al. Atlas: a high-cadence all-sky survey system. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 130, 064505 (2018).
Onken, C. A. et al. SkyMapper Southern Survey: second data release (DR2). Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 36, e033 (2019).
Wright, E. L. et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): mission description and initial on-orbit performance. Astron. J. 140, 1868–1881 (2010).
McConnell, D. et al. The Rapid ASKAP Continuum Survey I: design and first results. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 37, e048 (2020).
Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B. & Green, R. VLA observations of objects in the Palomar Bright Quasar Survey. Astron. J. 98, 1195–1207 (1989).
Lai, S. samlaihei/pyqspecfit: Pyqspecfit v.1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7772752 (2023).
Richards, G. T. et al. Spectral energy distributions and multiwavelength selection of type 1 quasars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 166, 470–497 (2006).
Runnoe, J. C., Brotherton, M. S. & Shang, Z. Updating quasar bolometric luminosity corrections. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 422, 478–493 (2012).
Yu, Q. & Tremaine, S. Observational constraints on growth of massive black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 335, 965–976 (2002).
Calderone, G., Ghisellini, G., Colpi, M. & Dotti, M. Black hole mass estimate for a sample of radio-loud narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431, 210–239 (2013).
Capellupo, D. M., Netzer, H., Lira, P., Trakhtenbrot, B. & Mejía-Restrepo, J. Active galactic nuclei at z���∼ 1.5–I. Spectral energy distribution and accretion discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 3427–3446 (2015).
Mejía-Restrepo, J. E., Lira, P., Netzer, H., Trakhtenbrot, B. & Capellupo, D. M. The effect of nuclear gas distribution on the mass determination of supermassive black holes. Nat. Astron. 2, 63–68 (2018).
Campitiello, S., Celotti, A., Ghisellini, G. & Sbarrato, T. Estimating black hole masses: accretion disk fitting versus reverberation mapping and single epoch. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A39 (2020).
Abramowicz, M. A., Czerny, B., Lasota, J. P. & Szuszkiewicz, E. Slim accretion disks. Astrophys. J. 332, 646–658 (1988).
Sadowski, A. et al. Relativistic slim disks with vertical structure. Astron. Astrophys. 527, A17 (2011).
Lai, S. samlaihei/badfit: Badfit v.1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7772748 (2023).
Laor, A. & Davis, S. W. Cold accretion discs and lineless quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 417, 681–688 (2011).
Malkan, M. A. The ultraviolet excess of luminous quasars. II. Evidence for massive accretion disks. Astrophys. J. 268, 582–590 (1983).
GRAVITY Collaboration. Spatially resolved rotation of the broad-line region of a quasar at sub-parsec scale. Nature 563, 657–660 (2018).
McLure, R. J. & Jarvis, M. J. Measuring the black hole masses of high-redshift quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 109–116 (2002).
Vestergaard, M. & Peterson, B. M. Determining central black hole masses in distant active galaxies and quasars. II. Improved optical and UV scaling relationships. Astrophys. J. 641, 689–709 (2006).
Peterson, B. M. et al. Central masses and broad-line region sizes of active galactic nuclei. II. A homogeneous analysis of a large reverberation-mapping database. Astrophys. J. 613, 682–699 (2004).
Coatman, L. et al. Correcting C IV-based virial black hole masses. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 2120–2142 (2017).
Vestergaard, M. & Osmer, P. S. Mass functions of the active black holes in distant quasars from the Large Bright Quasar Survey, the Bright Quasar Survey, and the color-selected sample of the SDSS Fall Equatorial Stripe. Astrophys. J. 699, 800–816 (2009).
Shen, Y. et al. A catalog of quasar properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 194, 45 (2011).
Shen, Y., Greene, J. E., Strauss, M. A., Richards, G. T. & Schneider, D. P. Biases in virial black hole masses: an SDSS perspective. Astrophys. J. 680, 169–190 (2008).
Lai, S. et al. Virial black hole mass estimates of quasars in the XQ-100 legacy survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 3230–3247 (2023).
Tsukui, T. & Iguchi, S. Spiral morphology in an intensely star-forming disk galaxy more than 12 billion years ago. Science 372, 1201–1205 (2021).
Bañados, E. et al. The z = 7.54 quasar ULAS J1342+0928 is hosted by a galaxy merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 881, L23 (2019).
Bischetti, M. et al. The WISSH quasars project. IX. Cold gas content and environment of luminous QSOs at z ∼ 2.4–4.7. Astron. Astrophys. 645, A33 (2021).
Onken, C. A. et al. Discovery of the most luminous quasar of the last 9 Gyr. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 39, e037 (2022).
Webster, R. L., Francis, P. J., Petersont, B. A., Drinkwater, M. J. & Masci, F. J. Evidence for a large undetected population of dust-reddened quasars. Nature 375, 469–471 (1995).
Warren, S. J., Hewett, P. C. & Foltz, C. B. The KX method for producing K-band flux-limited samples of quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 312, 827–832 (2000).
Wisotzki, L. et al. The Hamburg/ESO survey for bright QSOs. III. A large flux-limited sample of QSOs. Astron. Astrophys. 358, 77–87 (2000).
Fan, X. et al. High-redshift quasars found in Sloan Digital Sky Survey commissioning data. III. A color-selected sample at I* < 20 in the Fall Equatorial Stripe. Astron. J. 121, 31–53 (2001).
Wolf, C. et al. The evolution of faint AGN between z ≈ 1 and z ≈ 5 from the COMBO-17 survey. Astron. Astrophys. 408, 499–514 (2003).
Stern, D. et al. Mid-infrared selection of active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 631, 163–168 (2005).
Richards, G. T. et al. Efficient photometric selection of quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. II. ∼1,000,000 quasars from Data Release 6. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 180, 67–83 (2009).
Ivezić, Ž. et al. in Multiwavelength AGN Surveys and Studies Vol. 304 (eds Mickaelian, A. M. & Sanders, D. B.) 11–17 (IAUS, 2014).
Reed, S. L. et al. Eight new luminous z ≥ 6 quasars discovered via SED model fitting of VISTA, WISE and Dark Energy Survey Year 1 observations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 4702–4718 (2017).
Calderone, G. et al. Finding the brightest cosmic beacons in the southern hemisphere. Astrophys. J. 887, 268 (2019).
Yang, Q. & Shen, Y. A southern photometric quasar catalog from the Dark Energy Survey Data Release 2. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 264, 9 (2023).
Storey-Fisher, K. et al. Quaia, the Gaia-unWISE quasar catalog: an all-sky spectroscopic quasar sample. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.17749 (2023).
Delchambre, L. et al. Gaia DR3: Apsis III – non-stellar content and source classification. Astron. Astrophys. 674, A31 (2023).
Fu, Y. et al. Finding quasars behind the galactic plane. II. Spectroscopic identifications of 204 quasars at ∣b∣ < 20°. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 261, 32 (2022).
Bentz, M. C. et al. The low-luminosity end of the radius–luminosity relationship for active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 767, 149 (2013).
Sandage, A. The change of redshift and apparent luminosity of galaxies due to the deceleration of selected expanding universes. Astrophys. J. 136, 319–333 (1962).
Liske, J. et al. Cosmic dynamics in the era of extremely large telescopes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 386, 1192–1218 (2008).
Cristiani, S. et al. Spectroscopy of QUBRICS quasar candidates: 1672 new redshifts and a golden sample for the Sandage test of the redshift drift. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, 2019–2028 (2023).
Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 649, A1 (2021).
Dey, A. et al. Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. Astron. J. 157, 168 (2019).
Fabricius, C. et al. Gaia Early Data Release 3. Catalogue validation. Astron. Astrophys. 649, A5 (2021).
Lemon, C. Gravitationally Lensed Quasar Database (University of Cambrdige); https://research.ast.cam.ac.uk/lensedquasars/
Vernet, J. et al. X-shooter, the new wide band intermediate resolution spectrograph at the ESO Very Large Telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 536, A105 (2011).
Prochaska, J. X. et al. Pypeit: the Python spectroscopic data reduction pipeline. J. Open Source Softw. 5, 2308 (2020).
Vestergaard, M. & Wilkes, B. J. An empirical ultraviolet template for iron emission in quasars as derived from I Zwicky 1. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 134, 1–33 (2001).
Tsuzuki, Y. et al. Fe II emission in 14 low-redshift quasars. I. Observations. Astrophys. J. 650, 57–79 (2006).
Mejía-Restrepo, J. E., Trakhtenbrot, B., Lira, P., Netzer, H. & Capellupo, D. M. Active galactic nuclei at z ∼ 1.5 – II. Black hole mass estimation by means of broad emission lines. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 187–211 (2016).
Bruhweiler, F. & Verner, E. Modeling Fe II emission and revised Fe II (UV) empirical templates for the Seyfert 1 galaxy I Zw 1. Astrophys. J. 675, 83–95 (2008).
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P. & Davis, M. Maps of dust infrared emission for use in estimation of reddening and cosmic microwave background radiation foregrounds. Astrophys. J. 500, 525–553 (1998).
Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Measuring reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey stellar spectra and recalibrating SFD. Astrophys. J. 737, 103 (2011).
Fitzpatrick, E. L. Correcting for the effects of interstellar extinction. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 111, 63–75 (1999).
Marocco, F. et al. The CatWISE2020 catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 253, 8 (2021).
Selsing, J., Fynbo, J. P. U., Christensen, L. & Krogager, J. K. An X-Shooter composite of bright 1 < z < 2 quasars from UV to infrared. Astron. Astrophys. 585, A87 (2016).
Temple, M. J., Banerji, M., Hewett, P. C., Rankine, A. L. & Richards, G. T. Exploring the link between C IV outflow kinematics and sublimation-temperature dust in quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 3061–3073 (2021).
Davis, S. W., Blaes, O. M., Hubeny, I. & Turner, N. J. Relativistic accretion disk models of high-state black hole X-ray binary spectra. Astrophys. J. 621, 372–387 (2005).
Davis, S. W. & Hubeny, I. A grid of relativistic, non-LTE accretion disk models for spectral fitting of black hole binaries. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 164, 530–535 (2006).
Li, L.-X., Zimmerman, E. R., Narayan, R. & McClintock, J. E. Multitemperature blackbody spectrum of a thin accretion disk around a Kerr black hole: model computations and comparison with observations. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 157, 335–370 (2005).
Krawczyk, C. M. et al. Mining for dust in type 1 quasars. Astron. J. 149, 203 (2015).
Astropy Collaboration et al. The Astropy project: sustaining and growing a community-oriented open-source project and the latest major release (v5.0) of the core package. Astrophys. J. 935, 167 (2022).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) through Discovery Project DP190100252 (C.W., F.B., C.A.O. and S.L.). S.L. is grateful to the Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics at the Australian National University (ANU) for funding his Ph.D. studentship. We thank G. Ferrami from the University of Melbourne for discussing solutions for strong gravitational lensing. Data for this project were obtained at the European Southern Observatory through DDT proposal 2110.B-5032. This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC; https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular, the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, and NEOWISE, which is a project of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology. WISE and NEOWISE are funded by NASA. SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey material is based on photographic data originating from the UK, Palomar and ESO Schmidt telescopes and is provided by the Wide-Field Astronomy Unit, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh. This work made use of Astropy (http://www.astropy.org), a community-developed core Python package and an ecosystem of tools and resources for astronomy102. This research has made use of the SVO Filter Profile Service (http://svo2.cab.inta-csic.es/theory/fps/) supported from the Spanish MINECO through grant AYA2017-84089. The national facility capability for SkyMapper has been funded through ARC LIEF grant LE130100104 from the Australian Research Council, awarded to the University of Sydney, the ANU, Swinburne University of Technology, the University of Queensland, the University of Western Australia, the University of Melbourne, Curtin University of Technology, Monash University and the Australian Astronomical Observatory. SkyMapper is owned and operated by The ANU’s Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics. The survey data were processed and provided by the SkyMapper Team at ANU. The SkyMapper node of the All-Sky Virtual Observatory is hosted at the National Computational Infrastructure. Development and support of the SkyMapper node of the All-Sky Virtual Observatory has been funded in part by Astronomy Australia Limited and the Australian Government through the Commonwealth’s Education Investment Fund and the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, in particular, the National eResearch Collaboration Tools and Resources and the Australian National Data Service Projects. This work uses data from the University of Hawaii’s ATLAS project, funded through NASA grants NN12AR55G, 80NSSC18K0284 and 80NSSC18K1575, with contributions from the Queen’s University Belfast, the Space Telescope Science Institute, the South African Astronomical Observatory and the Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Chile.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to data collection. S.L. led the data analysis with contributions from C.A.O. and C.W. C.W. selected the quasar candidates and led the drafting and editing of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wolf, C., Lai, S., Onken, C.A. et al. The accretion of a solar mass per day by a 17-billion solar mass black hole. Nat Astron 8, 520–529 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02195-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02195-x