Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial modeling and prediction under stationary non-geometric range anisotropy

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For modeling spatial processes, we propose a rich parametric class of stationary range anisotropic covariance structures that, when applied in R2, greatly increases the scope of variogram contors. Geometric anisotropy, which provides the most common generalization of isotropy within stationarity, is a special case. Our class is built from monotonic isotropic correlation functions and special cases include the Matérn and the general exponential functions. As a result, our range anisotropic correlation specification can be attached to a second order stationary spatial process model, unlike ad hoc approaches to range anisotropy in the literature. We adopt a Bayesian perspective to obtain full inference and demonstrate how to fit the resulting model using sampling-based methods. In the presence of measurement error/microscale effect, we can obtain both the usual predictive as well as the noiseless predictive distribution. We analyze a data set of scallop catches under the general exponential range anisotropic model, withholding ten sites to compare the accuracy and precision of the standard and noiseless predictive distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1965) Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, L. and Chao, L. (1994) Estimates of a multidimensional covariance function in case of anisotropy. Mathematical Geology, 26(2), 161–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Le, N., and Zidek, J. (1994) Multivariate spatial interpolation and exposure to air pollutants. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 22(4), 489–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira, V., Kedem, B., and Short, D. (1997) Bayesian prediction of transformed Gaussian random fields. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 1422–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P.J., Tawn, J.A., and Moyeed, R.A. (1998) Model-based geostatistics (with discussion). Applied Statistics, 47, 299–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, M. (2003) Geostatistics: past, present and future. Encyclopedia of Life Support Sciences, (to appear).

  • Ecker, M. and Gelfand, A. (1997) Bayesian variogram modeling for an isotropic spatial process. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2, 347–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, M. and Gelfand, A. (1999) Bayesian modeling and inference for geometrically anisotropic spatial data. Mathematical Geology, 31(1), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M. and Siska, P.P. (2000) Understanding anisotropic computations. Mathematical Geology, 32(6), 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudard, M., Karson, M., Linder, E., and Sinha, D. (1999) Bayesian spatial prediction. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 6(2), 147–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A, Ecker, M., Knight, J., and Sirmans, C. (2003) The dynamics of location in home prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics (to appear).

  • Handcock, M. and Stein, M. (1993) A Bayesian analysis of kriging. Technometrics, 35(4), 403–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handcock, M. and Wallis, J. (1994) An approach to statistical spatial-temporal modeling of meteorological fields (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(426), 368–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobert, J.P. and Casella, G. (1996) The effect of improper priors on Gibbs sampling in hierarchical linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 1461–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. and Huijbregts, C. (1978) Mining Geostatistics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, P., Molinska, A., and Molinska, K. (1996) Elliptical anisotropy in practice—a study of air monitoring data. Environmetrics, 7, 291–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, N. and Zidek, J. (1992) Interpolation with uncertain spatial covariances: a Bayesian alternative to kriging. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 43, 351–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. and Smith A. (1972) Bayes estimates for the linear model (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society—Series B, 34, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matérn, B. (1986) Spatial Variation, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G. (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology, 58, 1246–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney, A. and Webster, R. (1986) Choosing functions for semi-variograms of soil properties and fitting them to sampling estimates. Journal of Soil Science, 37, 617–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberg, I. (1938) Metric spaces and completely monotone functions. Annals of Mathematics, 39, 811–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. (1999) Interpolation of Spatial Data, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S. (1982) Matrix Algebra Useful for Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchia, A. (1988) Estimation and model identification for continuous spatial processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society—Series B, 50(2), 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. (1993) Another look at anisotropy in geostatistics. Mathematical Geology, 25(4), 453–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ecker, M.D., Gelfand, A.E. Spatial modeling and prediction under stationary non-geometric range anisotropy. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10, 165–178 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023600123559

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023600123559

Navigation