Skip to main content
Log in

Partial-Order Reduction in Symbolic State-Space Exploration

  • Published:
Formal Methods in System Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

State-space explosion is a fundamental obstacle in the formal verification of designs and protocols. Several techniques for combating this problem have emerged in the past few years, among which two are significant: partial-order reduction and symbolic state-space search. In asynchronous systems, interleavings of independent concurrent events are equivalent, and only a representative interleaving needs to be explored to verify local properties. Partial-order methods exploit this redundancy and visit only a subset of the reachable states. Symbolic techniques, on the other hand, capture the transition relation of a system and the set of reachable states as boolean functions. In many cases, these functions can be represented compactly using binary decision diagrams (BDDs). Traditionally, the two techniques have been practiced by two different schools—partial-order methods with enumerative depth-first search for the analysis of asynchronous network protocols, and symbolic breadth-first search for the analysis of synchronous hardware designs. We combine both approaches and develop a method for using partial-order reduction techniques in symbolic BDD-based invariant checking. We present theoretical results to prove the correctness of the method, and experimental results to demonstrate its efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Alur and T.A. Henzinger, “Reactive modules,” in Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD, 1996, pp. 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.R. Burch, E.M. Clarke, and D.E. Long, “Symbolic model checking with partitioned transition relations,” in DAC 91: Design Automation Conference, 1991, pp. 403–407.

  3. J.R. Burch, E.M. Clarke, K.L. McMillan, D.L. Dill, and L.J. Hwang, “Symbolic model checking: 1020 states and beyond,” Information and Computation, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 142–170, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.K. Brayton, G.D. Hachtel, A.L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, F. Somenzi, A. Aziz, S.-T. Cheng, S. Edwards, S. Khatri, Y. Kukimoto, A. Pardo, S. Qadeer, R.K. Ranjan, S. Sarwary, T.R. Shiple, G.M. Swamy, and T. Villa, “VIS:Asystem for verification and synthesis,” in R. Alur and T.A. Henzinger (Eds.), CAV 96: Computer Aided Verification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996, pp. 428–432.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.-T. Chou and D.A. Peled, “Formal verification of a partial-order reduction technique for model checking,” in TACAS 96: Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1055, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996, pp. 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Dolev, M. Klawe, and M. Rodeh, “An O (n log n) unidirectional distributed algorithm for extrema finding in a circle,” Journal of Algorithms, Vol. 3, 1982, pp. 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Godefroid, Partial-Order Methods for the Verification of Concurrent Systems: An Approach to the State-Explosion Problem. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1032, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Godefroid and P. Wolper, “A partial approach to model checking,” Information and Computation, Vol. 110, No. 2, pp. 305–326, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.J. Holzmann and D.A. Peled, “An improvement in formal verification,” in Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Formal Description Techniques, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994, pp. 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Kam, T. Villa, R.K. Brayton, and A.L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Multi-valued decision diagrams: theory and applications. International Journal on Multiple-Valued Logic, Vol. 4, No. 1/2, pp. 9–62, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Mazurkiewicz, “Basic notions of trace theory,” in J.W. de Bakker, W.-P. de Roever, and G. Rozenberg (Eds.), Linear Time, Branching Time, and Partial Order in Logics and Models for Concurrency. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 354, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989, pp. 285–363.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.L. McMillan, Symbolic Model Checking: An Approach to the State-Explosion Problem. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Peled, “All from one, one for all: On model checking using representatives,” in C. Courcoubetis (Ed.), CAV 93: Computer Aided Verification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 697, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993, pp. 409–423.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.K. Ranjan, A. Aziz, B. Plessier, C. Pixley, and R.K. Brayton, “Efficient formal design verification: Data structures + algorithms,” in Workshop Notes of the International Workshop on Logic Synthesis, 1995.

  15. Thomas R. Shiple, Ramin Hojati, Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, and Robert K. Brayton, “Heuristic minimization of BDDs using don't cares,” in DAC 94: Design Automation Conference, 1994, pp. 225–231.

  16. A. Valmari, “Astubborn attack on state explosion,” in R.P. Kurshan and E.M. Clarke (Eds.), CAV 90: Computer Aided Verification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 531, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alur, R., Brayton, R., Henzinger, T. et al. Partial-Order Reduction in Symbolic State-Space Exploration. Formal Methods in System Design 18, 97–116 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008767206905

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008767206905

Navigation