Abstract
Structural equation model (SEM) is a multivariate analysis tool that has been widely applied to many fields such as biomedical and social sciences. In the traditional SEM, it is often assumed that random errors and explanatory latent variables follow the normal distribution, and the effect of explanatory latent variables on outcomes can be formulated by a mean regression-type structural equation. But this SEM may be inappropriate in some cases where random errors or latent variables are highly nonnormal. The authors develop a new SEM, called as quantile SEM (QSEM), by allowing for a quantile regression-type structural equation and without distribution assumption of random errors and latent variables. A Bayesian empirical likelihood (BEL) method is developed to simultaneously estimate parameters and latent variables based on the estimating equation method. A hybrid algorithm combining the Gibbs sampler and Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is presented to sample observations required for statistical inference. Latent variables are imputed by the estimated density function and the linear interpolation method. A simulation study and an example are presented to investigate the performance of the proposed methodologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jöreskog K G, A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system, Eds. by Goldberger E S and Duncan O D, Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, Seminar Press, New York, 1973, 85–112.
Jöreskog K G and Sörbom D, LISREL 8: Structural Equation Moldeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software International, Hove adn London, 1996.
Skrondal A and Rabe-Hesketh S, Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2004.
Lee S Y, Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian Approach, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2007.
Wang Y F, Feng X N, and Song X Y, Bayesian quantile structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2016, 23: 246–258.
Lee S Y and Zhu H, Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 2002, 67: 189–210.
Lee S Y and Tang N S, Analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with nonignorable missing covaariates and ordered categorical data. Statistica Sinica, 2006, 16: 1117–1141.
Cai J H, Song X Y, and Hser Y I, A Bayesian analysis of mixture structural equation models with nonignorable missing responses and covariates, Statistics in Medicine, 2010, 29: 1861–1874.
Song X Y, Lu Z, Hser Y I, et al., A Bayesian approach for analyzing longitudinal structural equation models, Structural Equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011, 18: 183–194.
Guo R X, Zhu H T, Chow S M, et al., Bayesian lasso for semiparametric structural equation models, Biometrics, 2012, 68: 567–577.
Koenker R, Quantile Regression, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
Yu K and Moyeed R A, Bayesian quantile regression. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2001, 54: 437–447.
Dunson D B and Taylor J A, Approximate Bayesian inference for quantiles. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 2005, 17: 385–400.
Kottas A and Krnjajić M, Bayesian semiparametric modelling in quantile regression. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2009, 36: 297–319.
Reich B J, Bondell H D, and Wang H J, Flexible Bayesian quantile regression for independent and clustered data. Biostatistics, 2010, 11: 337–352.
Lancaster T and Sung J J, Bayesian quantile regression methods. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2010, 25: 287–307.
Yang Y and He X, Bayesian empirical likelihood for quantile regression. The Annals of Statistics, 2012, 40: 1102–1131.
Feng X N, Wang G C, Wang Y F, et al., Structure detection of semiparametric structural equation models with bayesian adaptive group lasso, Statistics in Medicine, 2015, 34: 1527–1547.
Lazar N A, Bayesian empirical likelihood. Biometrika, 2003, 90: 319–326.
Schennach S, Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood. Biometrika, 2005, 92: 31–46.
Fang K T and Mukerjee R, Empirical-type likelihoods allowing posterior credible sets with frequentist validity: Higher-order asymptotics. Biometrika, 2006, 93: 723–733.
Chang I H and Mukerjee R, Bayesian and frequentist confidence intervals arising from empiricaltype likelihoods. Biometrika, 2008, 95: 139–147.
Mukerjee R, Data-dependent probability matching priors for empirical and related likelihoods, Pushing the Limits of Contempo-rary Statistics: Contributions in Honor of Jayanta K. Ghosh, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2008, 3: 60–70.
Grendár M and Judge G, Asymptotic equivalence of empirical likelihood and bayesian map. The Annals of Statistics, 2009, 37: 2445–2457.
Rao J and Wu C, Bayesian pseudo-empirical-likelihood intervals for complex surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 2010, 72: 533–544.
Chaudhuri S and Ghosh M, Empirical likelihood for small area estimation. Biometrika, 2011, 98: 473–480.
Song X Y and Lee S Y, Basic and Advanced Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling: With Applications in the Medical and Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 2012.
Owen A B, Empirical Likelihood, Chapman & Hall, New York, 2001.
Wei Y, Ma Y Y, and Carroll R J, Multiple imputation in quantile regression. Biometrika, 2012, 99: 423–438.
Chen J, Sitter R R, and Wu C, Using empirical likelihood methods to obtain range restricted weights in regression estimators for surveys. Biometrika, 2002, 89: 230–237.
Gelman A, Inference and Monitoring Convergence in Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11165016.
This paper was recommended for publication by Editor SHAO Jun.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Tang, N. Bayesian empirical likelihood estimation of quantile structural equation models. J Syst Sci Complex 30, 122–138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-017-6254-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-017-6254-x