Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Novel Hybrid Optimization for Cluster‐Based Routing Protocol in Information-Centric Wireless Sensor Networks for IoT Based Mobile Edge Computing

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In present days, the utilization of mobile edge computing (MEC) and Internet of Things (IoT) in mobile networks offers a bottleneck in the evolving technological requirements. Wireless Sensors Network (WSN) become an important component of the IoT and is the major source of big data. In IoT enabled WSN, a massive amount of data collection generated from a resource-limited network is a tedious process, posing several challenging issues. Traditional networking protocols offer unfeasible mechanisms for large-scaled networks and might be applied to IoT platform without any modifications. Information-Centric Networking (ICN) is a revolutionary archetype which that can resolve those big data gathering challenges. Employing the ICN architecture for resource-limited WSN enabled IoT networks may additionally enhance the data access mechanism, reliability challenges in case of a mobility event, and maximum delay under multihop communication. In this view, this paper proposes an IoT enabled cluster based routing (CBR) protocol for information centric wireless sensor networks (ICWSN), named CBR-ICWSN. The proposed model undergoes a black widow optimization (BWO) based clustering technique to select the optimal set of cluster heads (CHs) effectively. Besides, the CBR-ICWSN technique involves an oppositional artificial bee colony (OABC) based routing process for optimal selection of paths. A series of simulations take place to verify the performance of the CBR-ICWSN technique and the results are examined under several aspects. The experimental outcome of the CBR-ICWSN technique has outperformed the compared methods interms of network lifetime and energy efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tavcar, J., & Horvath, I. A. (2018). Review of the principles of designing smart cyber-physical systems for run-time adaptation: Learned lessons and open issues. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 49, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rani, S., Ahmed, S. H., Talwar, R., & Malhotra, J. (2017). Can sensors collect big data? An energy-efficient big data gathering algorithm for a WSN. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13, 1961–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Virgilio, M., Marchetto, G., & isto, R. (2013). PIT Overload Analysis in Content Centric Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM workshop on information-centric networking, Hong Kong, China, 12 August 2013 (pp. 67–72).

  4. Al-Turjman, F. M. (2017). Information-centric sensor networks for cognitive IoT: an overview. Ann. Telecommun, 72, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, G., Ngai, E. C. H., & Liu, J. (2014). Information-centric collaborative data collection for mobile devices in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), Sydney, Australia, 10–14 June 2014 (pp. 36–41).

  6. Amadeo, M., Campolo, C., Molinaro, A., & Mitton, N. (2013). Named Data Networking: A natural design for data collection in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 IFIP wireless days (WD), Valencia, Spain, 13–15 November 2013.

  7. Dinh, N. T., & Kim, Y. (2013). Potential of information-centric wireless sensor and actor networking. In Proceedings of the 2013 International conference on computing, management and telecommunications (ComManTel), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 21–24 January 2013 (pp. 163–168).

  8. Do, T., & Kim, Y. (2013). Information-centric wireless sensor and actor network in the industrial network. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on ICT convergence (ICTC), Jeju Island, Korea, 14–16 October 2013 (pp. 1095–1096).

  9. Dinh, N. T., & Kim, Y. (2020). An information-centric semantic data collection tree for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 20(21), 6168.

  10. Ur Rehman, M. A., Ullah, R., & Kim, B. S. (2019, September). A compact NDN architecture for cluster based information centric wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on information-centric networking (pp. 163–164).

  11. Intanagonwiwat, C., Govindan, R., & Estrin, D. (2000). Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, Boston, MA, USA, 6–11 August 2000; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2000 (pp. 56–67).

  12. Jacobson, V., Smetters, D. K., Thornton, J., Plass, M. F., Briggs, N. H., & Braynard, R. L. (2009) Networking Named Content. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on emerging networking experiments and technologies, Rome, Italy, 1–4 December 2009 (pp. 1–12).

  13. Jin, Y., Gormus, S., Kulkarni, P., & Sooriyabandara, M. (2016). Content centric routing in IoT networks and its integration in RPL. Computer Communications, 89, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thangavel, D., Ma, X., Valera, A., Tan, H. X., & Tan, C. K. Y. (2014). Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE ninth international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing (ISSNIP), Singapore, 21–24 April 2014 (pp. 1–6).

  15. Naik, N. (2017). Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE international systems engineering symposium (ISSE), Vienna, Austria, 11–13 October 2017 (pp. 1–7).

  16. Rahman, A., & Dijk, E. Group communication for the constrained application protocol (CoAP). https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7390. Accessed October 19, 2018.

  17. Ishaq, I., Hoebeke, J., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2016). Experimental evaluation of unicast and multicast CoAP group communication. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 16, 1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hui, J., & Kelsey, R. Multicast Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (MPL). https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7731. Accessed October 22, 2018.

  19. Vimal, S., Khari, M., Dey, N., Crespo, R. G., & Robinson, Y. H. (2020). Enhanced resource allocation in mobile edge computing using reinforcement learning based MOACO algorithm for IIOT. Computer Communications, 151, 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vimal, S., Khari, M., Crespo, R. G., Kalaivani, L., Dey, N., & Kaliappan, M. (2020). Energy enhancement using Multiobjective Ant colony optimization with Double Q learning algorithm for IoT based cognitive radio networks. Computer Communications, 154, 481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vimal, S., Suresh, A., Subbulakshmi, P., Pradeepa, S., & Kaliappan, M. (2020). Edge computing-based intrusion detection system for smart cities development using IoT in urban areas. In Internet of things in smart technologies for sustainable urban development (pp. 219–237). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Preeth, S. S. L., Dhanalakshmi, R., Kumar, R., & Shakeel, P. M. (2018). An adaptive fuzzy rule based energy efficient clustering and immune-inspired routing protocol for WSN-assisted IoT system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2018, 1–13.

  23. Hayyolalam, V., & Kazem, A. A. P. (2020). Black widow optimization algorithm: A novel meta-heuristic approach for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87, 103249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yue, Y., Li, J., Fan, H., & Qin, Q. (2016). Optimization-based artificial bee colony algorithm for data collection in large-scale mobile wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors.

  25. Dhaliwal, K. K., & Dhillon, J. S. (2016, March). On the design and optimization of digital IIR filter using oppositional artificial bee colony algorithm. In 2016 IEEE Students’ conference on electrical, electronics and computer science (SCEECS) (pp. 1–9). IEEE.

  26. Dutta, A. K., Elhoseny, M., Dahiya, V., & Shankar, K. (2020). An efficient hierarchical clustering protocol for multihop Internet of vehicles communication. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Uma Maheswari, P., Manickam, P., Sathesh Kumar, K., Maseleno, A., & Shankar, K. (2019). Bat optimization algorithm with fuzzy based PIT sharing (BF-PIT) algorithm for Named Data Networking (NDN). Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta, D., Khanna, A., Lakshmanaprabu, S. K., Shankar, K., Furtado, V., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2018). Efficient artificial fish swarm based clustering approach on mobility aware energy-efficient for MANET. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3524.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. K. Shankar would like to thank RUSA PHASE 2.0, Dept. of Edn. Govt. of India. The work of K. Shankar was supported by RUSA–Phase 2.0 grant sanctioned vide Letter No. F. 24–51/2014-U, Policy (TNMulti-Gen), Dept. of Edn. Govt. of India, Dt. 09.10.2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Shankar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaiyapuri, T., Parvathy, V.S., Manikandan, V. et al. A Novel Hybrid Optimization for Cluster‐Based Routing Protocol in Information-Centric Wireless Sensor Networks for IoT Based Mobile Edge Computing. Wireless Pers Commun 127, 39–62 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08088-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08088-w

Keywords

Navigation