Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A novel cloud-assisted framework for consumer internet of things based on lanner swarm optimization algorithm in smart healthcare systems

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Instantaneous data processing has the potential to enhance scalability, lessen power usage, and permit and improve data presentation in Consumer Internet of Things (CIoT) devices. In simple terms, cloud-based solutions cannot handle many IoT applications. According to Industrialized IoT (IIoT) technologies, an automated resource allocation system can improve service delivery and minimize healthcare costs. To maximize resource usage and response time for end users, there needs to be an effective method to efficiently distribute workload between Fog Layer and Cloud Connection and enhance cloud network capital allocation. Data analytics of complex and vital healthcare data requires timely responses, making it complicated. This paper proposes a design based on the Lanner Swarm Optimization (LSO) algorithm, which was developed to overcome inefficient heuristic strategies where data is transported to the cloud layer based on traffic type. The LSO algorithm is used to improve resource allocation and workload distribution in cloud-assisted CIoT applications for smart healthcare systems, improving scalability, power consumption, and data processing. The objective function determines if diverse virtual machines (VMs) vary accomplishment time the most, considering this study's updating and pruning restrictions. The experimentation analysis demonstrated that the proposed load balancing and work scheduling method outperforms evolutionary and heuristics algorithms. In experimentation, the research model attains a makespan of 10 s, response time of 5.5 s, resource utilization with a rate of 0.9, execution time of 13 s, latency of 10 ms, throughput of 0.78 s, and delivery rate of 0.74%. At resource scheduling, the LSO model had the best payload routing, latency, packet delivery ratio, and network lifetime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Rose K, Eldridge S, Chapin L (2015) The internet of things: an overview. Internet Soc (ISOC) 80:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shah SH, Yaqoob I (2016) A survey: Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, application and challenges. 2016 IEEE Smart Energy Grids Engineering (SEGE). 381-385

  3. Sharma N, Shamkumar M, Singh I (2019) The history, present and futures with IoT. In: IoT and big data analytic for smart generations. Springer, Cham, pp 27–51

  4. Gulati AG (2021) Moving up global value chains to unleash the potential of an empowered digital India. Available at SSRN 3924041

  5. Wood D, Apthorpe N, Feamster N (2017) Cleartexts data transmission in consumer IoT medical devices. In: Proceedings of the 2017 workshops on IoT security and privacy (IoTS&P '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139937.3139939

  6. Garge GK, Balakrishna C, Datta SK (2017) Consumer healthcare: current trend in consumer health monitoring. IEEE Consum Electron Mag 7(1):38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boric-Lubecke O, Gao X, Yavari E, Baboli M, Singh A, Lubecke VM (2014) E-healthcare: remote monitoring, privacy, and security. In: 2014 IEEE MTT-S international microwave symposiums (IMS2014). IEEE, pp 1–3

  8. Gu D, Yang X, Deng S, Liang C, Wang X, Wu J, Guo J (2020) Tracking knowledge evolution in cloud health care research: knowledge map and common word analysis. J Med Internet Res 22(2):e15142. https://doi.org/10.2196/15142

  9. Sivan R, Zukarnain ZA (2021) Security and privacy in cloud-based e-health systems. Symmetry 13(5):742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Isa ISBM, El-Gorashi TE, Musa MO, Elmirghani JM (2020) Energy efficient fog-based healthcare monitoring infrastructures. IEEE Access 8:197828–197852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Opara AC (2022) Representing IoT, cloud and edge computing security and privacy policiy and detecting potential problem. (Doctoral dissertation)

  12. de Moura Costa HJ, da Costa CA, da Rosa Righi R, Antunes RS (2020) Fog computing in health: a systematic literature review. Heal Technol 10(5):1025–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraemer FA, Braten AE, Tamkittikhun N, Palma D (2017) Fog computing in healthcare–a review and discussions. IEEE Access 5:9206–9222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Cai J, Khan F, Rehman AU, Balasubramaniam V, Sun J, Venu P (2020) A secured framework for sdn-based edge computing in IOT-enabled healthcare systems. IEEE Access 8:135479–135490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Asghar A, Abbas A, Khattak HA, Khan SU (2021) Fog based architectures and load balancing methodology for health monitoring system. IEEE Access 9:96189–96200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubey K, Sharma SC, Kumar M (2022) A secure IoT application allocations framework for integrated fog-cloud environments. J Grid Comput 20(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Talaat FM (2022) Effective predictions and resources allocation method (EPRAM) in fog computing environments for smart healthcare systems. Multimed Tools Appl 81(6):8235–8258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghanbari Z, JafariNavimipour N, Hosseinzadeh M, Darwesh A (2019) Resources allocation mechanism and approaches on the IoT. Clust Comput 22(4):1253–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdulhammed OY (2022) Load balancing of IoT task in the cloud computing by using sparrow search algorithm. J Supercomput 78(3):3266–3287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanbar AB, Faraj K (2022) Region aware dynamic tasks scheduling and resource virtualization for load balancing in IoT-fog multi-cloud environment. Futur Gener Comput Syst 137:70–86

  21. Leontiou N, Dechouniotis D, Denazis S, Papavassiliou S (2018) A hierarchical control framework of load balancing and resource allocation of cloud computing services. Comput Electr Eng 67:235–251

  22. Abdelmoneem RM, Benslimane A, Shaaban E (2020) Mobility-aware tasks scheduling in cloud-Fog IoT-based healthcare architecture. Comput Netw 179:107348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Talaat FM, Saraya MS, Saleh AI, Ali HA, Ali SH (2020) A load balancing and optimization strategy (LBOS) using reinforcement learning in fog computing environments. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 11(11):4951–4966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meng Y, Zhang W, Zhu H, Shen XS (2018) Securing consumer IoT in the smart home: architectures, challenge, and countermeasure. IEEE Wirel Commun 25(6):53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baho SA, Abawajy J (2023) Analysis of consumer IoT devices vulnerability quantifications framework. Electronics 12(5):1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Harkin D, Mann M, Warren I (2022) Consumer IoT and its under-regulations: finding from an Australian study. Policy Internet 14(1):96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verhoef PC, Stephen AT, Kannan PK, Luo X, Abhishek V, Andrews M, ..., Zhang Y (2017) Consumer connectivity in a complex, technology-enabled, and mobile-oriented world with smart product. J Int Mark 40(1):1–8

  28. Olga GK, Sarmah DK (2022) The baseline of global consumer cyber security standard for IoT: quality evaluations. J Cyber Secur Technol 6(4):175–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Poyner IK, Sherratt RS (2018) Privacy and security of consumer IoT device for the pervasive monitoring of vulnerable people. In: Living in the internet of things: cybersecurity of the IoT-2018, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2018.0043

  30. Ngwenya M, Ngoepe M (2022) Data trust in Consumer Internet of Things assemblages in the mobile and fixed telecommunications operators in South Africa. S Afr J Inf Manag 24(1):1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alladi T, Chamola V, Sikdar B, Choo KKR (2020) Consumer IoT: security vulnerability case studies and solution. IEEE Consum Electron Mag 9(2):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee J, Ardakani HD, Yang S, Bagheri B (2015) Industrial big data analytics and cyber-physical system for future maintenances & services innovation. Procedia CIRP 38:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mishra K, Majhi SK (2021) A binary bird swarm optimization based load balancing algorithms for cloud computing environments. Open Comput Sci 11(1):146–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rini DP, Shamsuddin SM, Yuhaniz SS (2011) Particles swarm optimization: techniques, systems and challenges. Int J Comput Appl 14(1):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gowree ER, Jagadeesh C, Talboys E, Lagemann C, Brücker C (2018) Vortices enable the complex aerobatics of peregrine falcons. Commun Biol 1(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. de Vasconcelos Segundo EH, Mariani VC, dos Santos Coelho L (2019) Design of heat exchanger using Falcon Optimization Algorithm. Appl Therm Eng 156:119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India

    V. Arulkumar

  2. Department of Computing Technologies, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, India

    M. Aruna

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Muhammed Sathak A J College of Engineering, Chennai, India

    D. Prakash

  4. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    M. Amanullah

  5. Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Muthukumaran Institute of Technology, Kanchipuram Chennai, India

    K. Somasundaram

  6. Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

    Rajendran Thavasimuthu

Authors
  1. V. Arulkumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Aruna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Prakash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Amanullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Somasundaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rajendran Thavasimuthu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Arulkumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arulkumar, V., Aruna, M., Prakash, D. et al. A novel cloud-assisted framework for consumer internet of things based on lanner swarm optimization algorithm in smart healthcare systems. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 68155–68179 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-18846-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-18846-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation