Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation on the Hill’s type lunar problem with homogeneous potential

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the planar Hill’s lunar problem with a homogeneous gravitational potential. The investigation of the system is twofold. First, the starting conditions of the trajectories are classified into three classes, that is, bounded, escaping, and collisional. Second, we study the no-return property of the Lagrange point \(L_2\) and we observe that the escaping trajectories are scattered exponentially. Moreover, it is seen that in the supercritical case, with the potential exponent \(\alpha \ge 2\), the basin boundaries are smooth. On the other hand, in the subcritical case, with \(\alpha <1\) the boundaries between the different types of basins exhibit fractal properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Abraham R, Marsden J (2008) Foundations of mechanics, 2nd edn. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer KR, Offin DC (2017) Introduction to Hamiltonian dynamical systems and the n-body problem. Applied mathematical sciences, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Moser JK, Siegel CL (1995) Lectures on celestial mechanics. Classics in mathematics. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon WB (1975) Conservative dynamical systems involving strong forces. Trans A M S 204:113–135

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. McGehee R (1981) Double collisions for a classical particle system with nongravitational interactions. Comment Math Helvetici 56:524–557

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Waalkens H, Burbanks A, Wiggins S (2005) Escape from planetary neighborhoods. Mon Not R Astron Soc 361:763–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zotos E (2017) Investigating the planar circular restricted three-body problem with strong gravitational field. Meccanica 52:1995–2021

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng Y, Ibrahim S (2020) Global existence and singularity of the n-body problem with strong force. Qual Theory Dyn Syst 19:49

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng Y, Ibrahim S (2020) Global existence and singularity of the Hill’s type lunar problem with strong potential. arXiv:org/abs/2010.05130

  10. Nakanishi K, Schlag W (2012) Global dynamics above the ground state energy for the cubic NLS equation in 3D. Calc Var PDE 44:1–45

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Akahori T, Ibrahim S, Kikuchi H, Nawa H Global dynamics above the ground state energy for the combined power-type nonlinear Schrödinger equations with energy-critical growth at low frequencies. (To appear in Memoirs of the A.M.S.)

  12. Benet L, Trautman D, Seligman T (1996) Chaotic scattering in the restricted three-body problem I. The Copenhagen problem. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 66:203–228

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng Y, Ibrahim S, Nakanishi K Dynamics classification for the supercritical Hill problem. (in preparation)

  14. Meyer KR, Schmidt DS (1982) Hill's lunar equations and the three-body problem. J Diff Eq 44:263–272

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Aguirre J, Vallego JC, Sanjuán MAF (2001) Wada basins and chaotic invariant sets in the Hénon–Heiles system. Phys Rev E 64:066208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aguirre J, Viana RL, Sanjuán MAF (2009) Fractal structures in nonlinear dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 81:333–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daza AA, Wagemakers B, Georgeot D, Guéry-Odelin MAF, Sanjuán (2016) Basin entropy: a new tool to analyze uncertainty in dynamical systems. Sci Rep 6, article number: 31416

  18. Skokos C (2001) Alignment indices: a new, simple method for determining the ordered or chaotic nature of orbits. J Phys A Math Gen 34:10029–10043

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Press HP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling BP (1992) Flannery: numerical recipes in FORTRAN 77, 2nd edn. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolfram S (2003) The mathematica book. Wolfram Media, Champaign

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagler J (2004) Crash test for the Copenhagen problem. Phys Rev E 69:066218

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagler J (2005) Crash test for the restricted three-body problem. Phys Rev E 71:026227

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Euaggelos E. Zotos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, Y., Ibrahim, S. & Zotos, E.E. Numerical investigation on the Hill’s type lunar problem with homogeneous potential. Meccanica 56, 2183–2195 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01386-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01386-4

Keywords

Navigation