Skip to main content
Log in

Taylor’s Law for Some Infinitely Divisible Probability Distributions from Population Models

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a family of random variables, Taylor’s law or Taylor’s power law of fluctuation scaling is a variance function that gives the variance \(\sigma ^{2}>0\) of a random variable (rv) X with expectation \(\mu >0\) as a power of \(\mu \): \(\sigma ^{2}=A\mu ^{b}\) for finite real \(A>0,\ b\) that are the same for all rvs in the family. Equivalently, TL holds when \(\log \sigma ^{2}=a+b\log \mu ,\ a=\log A\), for all rvs in some set. Here we analyze the possible values of the TL exponent b in five families of infinitely divisible two-parameter distributions and show how the values of b depend on the parameters of these distributions. The five families are Tweedie–Bar-Lev–Enis, negative binomial, compound Poisson-geometric, compound geometric-Poisson (or Pólya-Aeppli), and gamma distributions. These families arise frequently in empirical data and population models, and they are limit laws of Markov processes that we exhibit in each case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

There are no data associated with this paper.

References

  1. Applebaum, D.: Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 116, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bar-Lev, S.K.: Independent, tough identical results: the class of Tweedie on power variance functions and the class of Bar-Lev and Enis on reproducible natural exponential families. Int. J. Stat. Probab. 9(1), 30–35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijsp.v9n1p30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bar-Lev, S., Enis, P.: Reproducibility and natural exponential families with power variance functions. Ann. Stat. 14(4), 1507–1522 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bar-Lev, S., Stramer, O.: Characterizations of natural exponential families with power variance functions by zero regression properties. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 76, 509–522 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bar-Lev, S.K., Bshouty, D., Letac, G.: Natural exponential families and self-decomposability. Stat. Probab. Lett. 13, 147–152 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E., Stelzer, R.: The multivariate supOU stochastic volatility model. Math. Financ. 23(2), 275–296 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartlett, M.S.: Some notes on insecticide tests in the laboratory and in the field. J. R. Stat. Soc. 3(2), 185–194 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beall, G.: Methods of estimating the population of insects in a field. Biometrika 30(3/4), 422–439 (1939)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beall, G.: The transformation of data from entomological field experiments so that the analysis of variance becomes applicable. Biometrika 32, 243–262 (1942)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bertoin, J.: Subordinators, Lévy processes with no negative jumps, and branching processes. http://www.maphysto.dk/publications/MPS-LN/2000/8.pdf (2000)

  11. Bliss, C.I.: Statistical problems in estimating populations of Japanese beetle larvae. J. Econ. Entomol. 34(2), 221–232 (1941)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, M., Cohen, J.E., de la Peña, V.: Taylor’s law, via ratios, for some distributions with infinite mean. J. Appl. Probab. 54(3), 1–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/jpr.2017.25

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, M., Cohen, J.E., Tang, C.F., Yam, S.C.: Taylor’s law of fluctuation scaling for semivariances and higher moments of heavy-tailed data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(46), e2108031118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108031118

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, J.E.: Stochastic population dynamics in a Markovian environment implies Taylor’s power law of fluctuation scaling. Theor. Popul. Biol. 93, 30–37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2014.01.001

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen, J.E.: Every variance function, including Taylor’s power law of fluctuation scaling, can be produced by any location-scale family of distributions with positive mean and variance. Theor. Ecol. 13, 1–5 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen, J.E., Poulin, R., Lagrue, C.: Linking parasite populations in hosts to parasite populations in space through Taylor’s law and the negative binomial distribution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(1), E47–E56 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen, J.E., Davis, R.A., Samorodnitsky, G.: Heavy-tailed distributions, correlations, kurtosis, and Taylor’s law of fluctuation scaling. Proc. R. Soc. A 476, 20200610 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0610

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Comtet, L.: Analyse combinatoire. Tome 1. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisler, Z., Bartos, I., Kertesz, J.: Fluctuation scaling in complex systems: Taylor’s law and beyond. Adv. Phys. 57(1), 89–142 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730801893043

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fracker, S.B., Brischle, H.A.: Measuring the local distribution of Ribes. Ecology 25(3), 283–303 (1944)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris, T.E.: The Theory of Branching Processes. Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Berlin (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hayman, B.I., Lowe, A.D.: The transformation of counts of the cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae (L.)). N. Z J. Sci. 4, 271–278 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jørgensen, B.: Exponential dispersion models. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 49(2), 127–162 (1987)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jørgensen, B.: The Theory of Dispersion Models. Chapman & Hall, London (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Jørgensen, B., Kokonendji, C.C.: Discrete dispersion models and their Tweedie asymptotics. ASTA Adv. Stat. Anal. 100, 4378 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Jurek, Z.J.: Remarks on the self decomposability and new examples. Demonstr. Math. 34(2), 29–38 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kendal, W.S.: A probabilistic model for the variance to mean power law in ecology. Ecol. Model. 80(23), 293–297 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sato, K.-I.: Lévy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoutens, W.: Lévy Processes in Finance: Pricing Financial Derivatives (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics). Wiley, New York (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Steutel, F.W., van Harn, K.: Infinite Divisibility of Probability Distributions on the Real Line. Chapman & Hall/CRC Pure and Applied Mathematics, London (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor, L.R.: Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189(4766), 732–735 (1961)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor, R.A.J.: Taylor’s Power Law: Order and Pattern in Nature. Elsevier Academic Press, Cambridge (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. van Harn, K., Steutel, F.W., Vervaat, W.: Self-decomposable discrete distributions and branching processes. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 61, 97–118 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two reviewers for excellent constructive comments. T.H. acknowledges partial support from the “Chaire Modélisation mathématique et biodiversité” of Veolia-Ecole Polytechnique-MNHN-Fondation X, and support from the labex MME-DII Center of Excellence (Modèles mathématiques et économiques de la dynamique, de l’incertitude et des interactions, ANR-11-LABX-0023-01 project). This work was also funded by CY Initiative of Excellence (Grant “ Investissements d’Avenir” ANR- 16-IDEX-0008), Project “EcoDep” PSI-AAP2020-0000000013. The ECODEP project is organized by Paul Doukhan. We are grateful for this opportunity to collaborate.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel E. Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest associated with this paper.

Additional information

Communicated by Li-Cheng Tsai.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Here we briefly sketch that if X is SD, it is a weak limit of a pure-death branching process with immigration (if \(\mathbb {N}_{0}\)-valued), or a weak limit of a continuous-time Lévy-driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process (if continuous). The analysis concerns the rvs X obeying TL with \(a=0\). From the scaling transform (14) introducing \(a=\log \sigma _{1}^{2}\) , the modifications for \(a\ne 0\) could be readily obtained. In both discrete and continuous cases, a population that is randomly annihilated is randomly regenerated by the recurrent arrivals of random quantities of immigrants, yielding a stationary or invariant distribution of population size.

1.1 Discrete Self-decomposable rvs and Pure-Death Branching Processes with Immigration in Continuous Time

van Harn et al. [33] construct a regenerative process in continuous time that produces discrete SD distributions in the long run. Consider a continuous-time homogeneous compound Poisson process \(P_{r}(t)\), \(t\ge 0\), \( P_{r}(0)=0\), having rate \(r>0\), with pgf

$$\begin{aligned} {E}_{P_{r}(0)=0}(z^{P_{r}(t)})=\exp \{-rt(1-h(z))\}, \end{aligned}$$
(15)

where h(z), with \(h(0)=0\), is the pgf of the sizes of the clones or immigrant clusters arriving at the jump times of \(P_{r}(t)\). Let

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi _{t}(z)=1-e^{-t}(1-z) \end{aligned}$$
(16)

be the pgf of a pure-death branching process started with one particle at \( t=0\). (More general subcritical branching processes could be considered.) This expression of \(\varphi _{t}(z)\) is easily seen to solve \(\overset{.}{ \varphi }_{t}(z)=f(\varphi _{t}(z))=1-\varphi _{t}(z)\), \(\varphi _{0}(z)=z\), as is usual for a pure-death continuous-time Bellman-Harris branching process [21] with affine branching mechanism \(f(z)=r_{d}(1-z)\) with fixed death rate \(r_{d}=1\). The distribution function of the lifetime of the initial particle is \(1-e^{-t}\). Let \(X_{t}\) with \(X_{0}=0\) be a random process counting the current size of some population for which a random number of individuals (determined by h(z)) immigrate at the jump times of \(P_{r}(t)\). Each newly arrived individual is independently and immediately subject to the pure death process above. We have

$$\begin{aligned} \phi _{t}(z):={E}(z^{X_{t}})=\exp \left\{ -r\int \limits _{0}^{t}\left[ 1-h(\varphi _{s}(z))\right] ds\right\} ,\quad \phi _{0}(z)=1, \end{aligned}$$
(17)

with \(\phi _{t}(0)={P}(X_{t}=0)=\exp \{-r\int _{0}^{t}(1-h(1-e^{-s}))ds\},\) the probability that the population is extinct at t. As \(t\rightarrow \infty \),

$$\begin{aligned} \phi _{t}(z)\rightarrow \phi _{\infty }(z)&=\exp \left\{ -r\int \limits _{0}^{\infty }\left[ 1-h(1-e^{-s}(1-z))\right] ds\right\} \nonumber \\&=\exp \left\{ -r\int \limits _{z}^{1}\frac{1-h\left( u\right) }{1-u}du\right\} . \end{aligned}$$
(18)

So \(X:=X_{\infty },\) as the limiting population size of this pure-death process with immigration, is a SD rv [33]. Define the rv \(X_{c}\) implicitly by requiring that \(X\overset{d}{=}cX^{\prime }+X_{c}\), where \( X^{\prime }\) is an iid copy of X and \(0<c<1\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} \phi _{X_{c}}(z)=\frac{\phi _{\infty }(z)}{\phi _{\infty }(1-c(1-z))}=\exp \left\{ -r\int \limits _{z}^{1-c(1-z)}\frac{1-h(u)}{1-u}du\right\} \end{aligned}$$

is a pgf. In such models typically, a decaying subcritical branching population is regenerated by a random number of incoming immigrants at random Poissonian times.

1.2 Continuous Self-decomposable rvs and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck Process in Continuous-Time

When X is continuous and SD, X is the limiting distribution of population size as \(t\rightarrow \infty \) of some Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process \(X_{t}\):

$$\begin{aligned} dX_{t}=-X_{t}dt+d\mathcal {L}_{t}, \ \ X_{0}=0, \end{aligned}$$

driven by the Lévy process \(\mathcal {L}_{t}\) for which

$$\begin{aligned} Ee^{-\lambda \mathcal {L}_{t}}=\Phi _{0}( \lambda ) ^{t}, \ \ t\ge 0, \end{aligned}$$

where \(\Phi _{0}( \lambda ) \) is the PLSt of an infinitely divisible rv appearing in the representation (7) of \(\Phi ( \lambda ) =Ee^{-\lambda X}\). See [26].

We now show that for a TweBLE rv with \(\alpha \in ( -\infty ,0) \), there is no \(L_{0}( \lambda ) =-\log \Phi _{0}( \lambda ) \) such that \(L_{0}^{\prime }( \lambda ) \) is completely monotone on \(( 0,\infty ) \). This result means that the TweBLE rv for \(\alpha \in ( -\infty ,0) \) is not SD, just infinitely divisible. Indeed, with \(L(\lambda )=-\log \Phi (\lambda )\),

$$\begin{aligned} L_{0}(\lambda )= & {} \lambda L^{\prime }(\lambda )=(1-\alpha )^{1-\alpha }\lambda (\theta +\lambda )^{\alpha -1}, \\ L_{0}^{\prime }(\lambda )= & {} (1-\alpha )^{1-\alpha }(\theta +\lambda )^{\alpha -2}[\theta +\lambda \alpha ], \end{aligned}$$

with \(L_{0}^{\prime }(\lambda )>0\) only if \(\lambda>\lambda _{c}=-\theta /\alpha >0,\) so not in the full range \(\lambda \in (0,\infty )\). So \(\Phi _{0}(\lambda )\) is not completely monotone on \((0,\infty )\), and is therefore not an infinitely divisible PLSt. This Poisson-gamma regime for which the limiting distribution is a Poisson sum P of iid gamma-distributed clusters of size \(\Delta \) was studied by [19, p. 17, Sect. 3.3.2], who underline what they call its “impact inhomogeneity”: \(E(\Delta )=C(\alpha )\cdot E(P)^{-1/\alpha }\) for some constant \(C(\alpha )>0\).

By contrast, if \(\alpha \in (0,1)\), then \(L_{0}(\lambda )\) may be written as

$$\begin{aligned} L_{0}(\lambda )=\int \limits _{0}^{\infty }(1-e^{-\lambda x})\pi (x)dx \end{aligned}$$

where

$$\begin{aligned} \pi (x)dx=\frac{1}{\Gamma (1-\alpha )}x^{-(\alpha +1)}(\alpha +\theta x)e^{-\theta x}dx \end{aligned}$$

is a tempered Lévy measure integrating \(1\wedge x\). The driving process \(\mathcal {L}_{t}\) of \(X_{t}\), with PLSt \(Ee^{-\lambda \mathcal {L} _{t}}=e^{-tL_{0}(\lambda )}\), is a subordinator and \(X=X_{\infty }\) is a SD TweBLE rv obtained as the limiting distribution of the corresponding Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. One could extend this construction to other SD subordinated Lévy families, such as those in [1, 6, 10, 28, 29].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, J.E., Huillet, T.E. Taylor’s Law for Some Infinitely Divisible Probability Distributions from Population Models. J Stat Phys 188, 33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-022-02962-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-022-02962-y

Keywords

Navigation