Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal timing of joint replacement using mathematical programming and stochastic programming models

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimal timing for performing radical medical procedures as joint (e.g., hip) replacement must be seriously considered. In this paper we show that under deterministic assumptions the optimal timing for joint replacement is a solution of a mathematical programming problem, and under stochastic assumptions the optimal timing can be formulated as a stochastic programming problem. We formulate deterministic and stochastic models that can serve as decision support tools. The results show that the benefit from joint replacement surgery is heavily dependent on timing. Moreover, for a special case where the patient's remaining life is normally distributed along with a normally distributed survival of the new joint, the expected benefit function from surgery is completely solved. This enables practitioners to draw the expected benefit graph, to find the optimal timing, to evaluate the benefit for each patient, to set priorities among patients and to decide if joint replacement should be performed and when.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitzgerald JD, Orav EJ, Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Poss R, Goldman L, Mangione CM (2004) Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research) 51(1):100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roder C, Parvizi J, Eggli S, Berry D, Muller M, Busato A (2003) Demographic factors affecting long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:62–73

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rasanen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H et al (2007) Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthopaedica 78(1):108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sintonen H (2001) The instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med 33:328–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sintonen H. 15 d-instrument (online) Available at: http://www.15d-instrument.net/15D, (Accessed 30 April 2011).

  6. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME (2009) Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clohisy JC, Calvert G, Tull F, McDonald D, Maloney WJ (2004) Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:188–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pamela (2009) Hip replacement and recovery. (online) Available at: http://www.hip-replacement-and-recovery.com/index.html, (Accessed 30 April 2011).

  9. Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2004) The optimal timing of living-donor liver transplantation. Manag Sci 50(10):1420–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gammie JS, Edwards LB, Griffith BP, Pierson RN, Tsao L (2004) Optimal timing of cardiac transplantation after ventricular assist device implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1789–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopushinsky SR, Fowler RA, Kulkarni GS, Fecteau AH, Grant DR, Wales PW (2007) The optimal timing of intestinal transplantation for children with intestinal failure: a Markov analysis. Ann Surg 246(6):1092–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chhatwal J, Alagoz O, Burnside ES (2010) Optimal breast biopsy decision-making based on mammographic features and demographic factors. Oper Res 58(6):1577–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JE, Keeney RL (2005) Your money or your life: a prescriptive model for health, safety, and consumption decisions. Manag Sci 51(9):1309–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Radcliffe GS, Tomichan MC, Andrews M, Stone MH (1999) Revision hip surgery in the elderly: is it worthwhile? J Arthroplast 14(1):38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Bélisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Katz JN (1999) Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 42(8):1722–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walpole RE, Myers RH (1978) Probability and statistics for engineers and Scientists, 2nd edn. Macmillan Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baruch Keren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keren, B., Pliskin, J.S. Optimal timing of joint replacement using mathematical programming and stochastic programming models. Health Care Manag Sci 14, 361–369 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-011-9172-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-011-9172-9

Keywords

Navigation