Abstract
Intuitively speaking, a classical field theory is background-independent if the structure required to make sense of its equations is itself subject to dynamical evolution, rather than being imposed ab initio. The aim of this paper is to provide an explication of this intuitive notion. Background-independence is not a not formal property of theories: the question whether a theory is background-independent depends upon how the theory is interpreted. Under the approach proposed here, a theory is fully background-independent relative to an interpretation if each physical possibility corresponds to a distinct spacetime geometry; and it falls short of full background-independence to the extent that this condition fails.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson J.: Relativity principles and the role of coordinates in physics. In: Chiu, H.Y., Hoffman, W. (eds) Gravitation and Relativity, pp. 175–194. W.A. Benjamin Inc, New York (1964)
Anderson J.: Principles of Relativity Physics. Academic Press, New York (1967)
Andersson L.: Momenta and reduction in general relativity. J. Geom. Phys. 4, 289–314 (1987)
Anninos, D., Ng, G.S., Strominger, A.: Asymptotic symmetries and charges in de Sitter space. ArXiv: 1009.4730v1 [gr-qc] (2010)
Ashtekar A., Magnon A.: Asymptotically anti-de Sitter space-times. Cl. Quantum Gravit. 1, L39–L44 (1984)
Belot G.: An elementary notion of gauge equivalence. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 199–215 (2008)
Carlip S.: Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Chruściel P., Isenberg J.: Nonisometric vacuum extensions of vacuum maximal globally hyperbolic spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 48, 1616–1628 (1993)
Ciarlet P., Gratie L., Mardare C.: Intrinsic methods in elasticity: a mathematical survey. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 23, 133–164 (2009)
Crnković v., Witten E.: Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories. In: Hawking, S., Israel, W. (eds) Three Hundred Years of Gravitation, pp. 676–684. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Deligne P., Freed D.: Classical field theory. In: Deligne, P., Etingof, P., Freed, D., Jeffrey, L., Kazhdan, D., Morgan, J., Morrison, D., Witten, E. (eds) Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians, vol. 1, pp. 137–225. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1999)
Diacu F.: Singularities of the N-Body Problem. Les Publications CRM, Montréal (1992)
Dirac P.A.M.: Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. Dover, New York (2001)
Earman J.: Covariance, invariance, and the equivalence of frames. Found. Phys. 4, 267–289 (1974)
Friedman M.: Relativity principles, absolute objects, and symmetry groups. In: Suppes, P. (eds) Space, Time, and Geometry, pp. 296–320. Reidel, Dordrecht (1973)
Friedman M.: Foundations of Spacetime Theories. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983)
Geroch R.: Electromagnetism as an aspect of geometry? Already unified field theory—the null case. Annal. Phys. 36, 147–187 (1966)
Geroch R.: Asymptotic stucture of space-time. In: Esposito, F.P., Witten, L. (eds) Asymptotic Stucture of Space-Time, pp. 1–105. Plenum Press, New York (1977)
Giulini D.: Some remarks on the notions of general covariance and background independence. In: Seiler, E., Stamatescu, I.O. (eds) Approaches to Fundamental Physics: An Assessment of Current Theoretical Ideas, pp. 105–120. Springer, Berlin (2007)
Gotay, M., Castrillón López, M.: Covariantizing classical field theories (2010). ArXiv:1008.3170v1 [math-ph]
Gotay M., Nester J., Hinds G.: Presymplectic manifolds and the Dirac–Bergmann theory of constraints. J. Math. Phys. 19, 2388–2399 (1978)
Gryb S.: A definition of background independence. Cl. Quantum Gravit. 27, 215018 (2010)
Hawking S., Ellis G.: The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973)
Henneaux M., Teitelboim C.: Quantization of Gauge Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)
Janssen, M.: No success like failure …: Einstein’s quest for general relativity, 1907–1920 (2008). Phil-Sci archive: 00004377
Janssen, M., Schulmann, R., Illy, J., Lehner, C., Kormos-Buchwald, D. (eds): The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7. The Berlin Years: Writings, 1918–1921. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002)
Kolář I., Michor P., Slovák J.: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Lee J., Wald R.: Local symmetries and constraints. J. Math. Phys. 31, 725–743 (1990)
Louko J., Marolf D.: The solution space of 2 + 1 gravity on \({\mathbb{R} \times {T} \sp 2}\) in Witten’s connection formulation. Cl. Quantum Gravit. 11, 311–330 (1994)
Marsden J., Hughes T.: Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity. Dover, New York (1994)
Meusburger C.: Cosmological measurements, time, and observables in (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity. Cl. Quantum Gravit. 26, 055006 (2009)
Norton J.: Einstein, Nordström, and the early demise of Lorentz-covariant, scalar theories of gravity. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 45, 17–94 (1992)
Norton J.: General covariance and the foundations of general relativity: eight decades of dispute. Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 791–858 (1993)
Olver P.: Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Pitts B.: Absolute objects and counterexamples: Jones-Geroch dust, Toretti constant curvature, tetrad-spinor, and scalar density. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 37, 347–371 (2006)
Ravndal, F.: Scalar gravitation and extra dimensions. In: Cranström, C., Montonen, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Gunnar Nordström Symposium of Theoretical Physics, pp. 151–164. The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, Helsinki (2004)
Rovelli C.: Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Sachs R., Wu H.H.: General Relativity for Mathematicians. Springer, Berlin (1977)
Sklar L.: Philosophy and Spacetime Physics. University of California Press, Berkeley (1985)
Smolin L.: The present moment in quantum cosmology: Challenges to the argument for the elimination of time. In: Durie, R. (eds) Time and the Instant: Essays in the Physics and Philosophy of Time, pp. 112–143. Clinamen, Manchester (2001)
Smolin L.: The case for background independence. In: Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J. (eds) The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, pp. 196–239. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Sorkin R.: An example relevant to the Kretschmann–Einstein debate. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 695–700 (2002)
Straumann, N.: Reflections on gravity (2000). ArXiv:astro-ph/0006423v1
Torre C.: Covariant phase space formulation of parameterized field theories. J. Math. Phys. 33, 3802–3811 (1992)
Wolf J.: Spaces of Constant Curvature, 5th edn. Publish or Perish, Wilmington (1984)
Zuckerman G.: Action principles and global geometry. In: Yau, S.T. (eds) Mathematical Aspects of String Theory, pp. 259–284. World Scientific, Singapore (1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belot, G. Background-independence. Gen Relativ Gravit 43, 2865–2884 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1210-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1210-x