A remarkable theorem by Clifton et al [Found Phys. 33(11), 1561–1591 (2003)] (CBH) characterizes quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic principles. According to Bub [Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 35 B, 241–266 (2004); Found. Phys. 35(4), 541–560 (2005)] the philosophical significance of the theorem is that quantum theory should be regarded as a “principle” theory about (quantum) information rather than a “constructive” theory about the dynamics of quantum systems. Here we criticize Bub’s principle approach arguing that if the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics remains intact then there is no escape route from solving the measurement problem by constructive theories. We further propose a (Wigner-type) thought experiment that we argue demonstrates that quantum mechanics on the information-theoretic approach is incomplete.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler S., (2003). “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P W Anderson”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 34B: 135–142
Adler S., (2005).“Stochastic collapse and decoherence of a non-dissipative forced harmonic oscillator”. J. Phys. A 38, 2729–2760
S. Adler, A. Bassi, and E. Ippoliti, “Towards quantum superpositions of a mirror: an exact open systems analysis—calculational details”, J. Phys. A 38, 2715 (2005).
Aharonov Y., Albert D., (1981). “Can we make sense of the measurement process in quantum mechanics?”. Phys. Rev. Lett. D 24, 359–370
Albert D., (1983). “On quantum mechanical automata”. Phys. Lett. A 98, 249–252
D. Albert, “The quantum mechanics of self–measurement,” in Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, W.H. Zurek (ed.) (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1990),
Balashov Y., Janssen M., (2003). “Presentism and relativity”. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 54, 327–346
Bassi A., Adler S., Ippoliti E.,(2005a). “Towards quantum superpositions of a mirror: an exact open systems analysis”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 030401
A Bassi, E. Ippoliti, and B. Vacchini, “On the energy increase in space-collapse models”, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0506083 (2005b).
Bell J.S., (1987). Speakable And Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bell J.S., (1990). “Against ‘measurement”’. Phys. World 8, 33–40
H. Brown, “Michelson, FitzGerald and Lorentz: the origins of relativity revisited”, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000987 (2003).
Brown H., (2006).Physical Relativity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
H. Brown, and C. Timpson, “Why special relativity should not be a template for a fundamental reformulation of quantum mechanics”, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0601182 (2006).
Bub J., (1997). Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bub J., (2000). “Quantum mechanics as a principle theory”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 31B, 75–94
Bub J., (2004). “Why the Quantum?”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 35B, 241–266
Bub J., (2005). “Quantum theory is about quantum information”, Found. Phys. 35(4): 541–560
Clifton R., Bub J., Halvorson H., (2003). “Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information–theoretic constraints”. Found. Phys. 33(11): 1561–1591
Caves C., Fuchs C., Schack R.,(2002). “Unknown quantum states: the quantum de Finetti representation”. J. Math. Phys. 43: 4537
Diosi L., (1989).“Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations”. Phys. Rev. A 40, 1165–1174
Dürr D., Goldstein S., Zanghi N., (1992). “Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty”. J. Stat. Phys. 67(5/6): 843–907
A. Einstein, “Time, Space, and Gravitation,” Times (London), 13–14, 28 November 1919. Reprinted as “What is the theory of relativity?” In Ideas and Opinions, A. Einstein (ed.) (Bonanza, New York, 1954), pp. 227–232.
C. Fuchs, “Quantum mechanics as quantum information (and a little more),” http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0205039 (2002).
Fuchs C., Peres A., (2002) “Quantum theory needs no interpretation”. Phys. Today 3, 70–71
G. C. Ghirardi, “Beyond conventional quantum mechanics,” in Quantum Reflections, J. Ellis and D. Amati, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp.
Ghirardi G.C., Rimini A., Weber T., (1980). “A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process”. Lett. Nuovo. Cim. 27, 293–298
Ghirardi G.C., Rimini A., Weber T., (1986). “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems”. Phys. Rev. D 34, 470–479
Gisin N., (1989).“Stochastic quantum dynamics and relativity”. Helv. Phys. Acta. 62, 363–371
Hagar A., (2003). “A philosopher looks at quantum information theory,” Phil. Sci. 70(3): 752–775
Harman P.M., (2001). The natural philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hemmo M., Shenker O., (1971). “Quantum decoherence and the approach to equilibrium”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 36B, 626–648 (2005).
Jánossy L., (1971) Theory of Relativity Based on Physical Reality. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest
Joos E. et al., (2003). Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World. Springer, Berlin
Nilsen M.A., Chuang I.L. (2000). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
I. Pitowsky, "Quantum mechanics as a theory of probability," http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/ quant-ph/0510095 (2005).
Schrödinger E., (1936). “Probability relations between separated systems”. Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc. 32, 446–452
Simon C., Buzek V., Gisin N., (2001). “No–signaling condition and quantum dynamics”. Phys. Rev. Let 87, 170405–170408
C. Timpson, “Quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics” (Ph.D. Dissertation, Oxford University), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0412063 (2004).
A. Valentini, “Subquantum information and computation,” http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs quant-ph/0203049 (2002).
ZurekW.H., (1991). “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical”. Phys. Today 44, 36–44
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagar, A., Hemmo, M. Explaining the Unobserved—Why Quantum Mechanics Ain’t Only About Information. Found Phys 36, 1295–1324 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9065-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9065-9