Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the shape of pressure-dependent yield surfaces on solution behaviour near frictional interfaces

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of the present paper is to demonstrate, by means of a problem permitting a semi-analytical solution, the effect of the shape of pressure-dependent yield surfaces on qualitative behaviour of rigid plastic solutions in the vicinity of frictional interfaces. The yield criterion used reduces to the classical Coulomb–Mohr yield criterion at specific values of input parameters and, therefore, can be further reduced to the classical Tresca yield criterion. The solution is singular (some components of the strain rate tensor approach infinity) in the vicinity of the maximum friction surface at sliding if the system of equations is hyperbolic. The dependence of the strain rate intensity factor on input parameters of the double-slip and rotation model based on quite a general plane-strain yield criterion is found, and its consequence on some physical processes in a narrow material layer near frictional interfaces is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spencer AJM (1964) A theory of the kinematics of ideal soils under plane strain conditions. J Mech Phys Solids 12: 337–351

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. de Josselin , de Jong G (1971) The double-sliding, free-rotating model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 21: 155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anand L (1983) Plane deformations of ideal granular materials. J Mech Phys Solids 31: 105–122

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kao AS, Kuhn HA, Spitzig WA, Richmond O (1990) Influence of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on bending fracture and formability of a low carbon steel containing globular sulfides. Trans ASME J Eng Mater Technol 112: 26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris D, Grekova EF (2005) A hyperbolic well-posed model for the flow of granular materials. J Eng Math 52: 107–135

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ostrowska-Maciejewska J, Harris D (1990) Three-dimensional constitutive equations for rigid/perfectly plastic granular materials. Math Proc Camb Phil Soc 108: 153–169

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kingston MR, Spencer AJM (1970) General yield conditions in plane deformations of granular media. J Mech Phys Solids 18: 233–243

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alexandrov S, Lyamina E (2005) Qualitative distinctions in the solutions based on the plasticity theories with Mohr–Coulomb yield criterion. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 46: 883–890

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexandrov S, Harris D (2006) Comparison of solution behaviour for three models of pressure-dependent plasticity: a simple analytic example. Int J Mech Sci 48: 750–762

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexandrov S, Richmond O (2001) Singular plastic flow fields near surfaces of maximum friction stress. Int J Non-Linear Mech 36: 1–11

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexandrov S, Lyamina E (2002) Singular solutions for plane plastic flow of pressure-dependent materials. Dokl Phys 47: 308–311

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexandrov S, Mishuris G (2009) Qualitative behaviour of viscoplastic solutions in the vicinity of maximum-friction surfaces. J Eng Math 65: 143–156

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Alexandrov S (2011) Behavior of anisotropic plastic solutions in the vicinity of maximum-friction surfaces. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 52: 483–490

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pemberton CS (1965) Flow of imponderable granular materials in wedge-shaped channels. J Mech Phys Solids 13: 351–360

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall EA (1967) The compression of a slab of ideal soil between rough plates. Acta Mech 3: 82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spencer AJM (1984) Plastic flow past a smooth cone. Acta Mech 54: 63–74

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Alexandrov S (2003) Comparison of double-shearing and coaxial models of pressure-dependent plastic flow at frictional boundaries. Trans ASME J Appl Mech 70: 212–219

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Alexandrov S, Lyamina E (2003) Plane-strain compression of material obeying the double-shearing model between rotating plates. Int J Mech Sci 45: 1505–1517

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Alexandrov S, Lyamina E (2004) Indentation of a wedge into a plastic medium governed by the double-shearing model. Mech Solids 39(5): 84–90

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spencer AJM (2005) Compression and shear of a layer of granular material. J Eng Math 52: 251–264

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Alexandrov S, Lyamina E (2006) Flow of pressure-dependent plastic material between two rough conical walls. Acta Mech 187: 37–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Moylan SP, Kompella S, Chandrasekar S, Farris TN (2003) A new approach for studying mechanical properties of thin surface layers affected by manufacturing processes. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 125: 310–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trunina TA, Kokovkhin EA (2008) Formation of a finely dispersed structure in steel surface layers under combined processing using hydraulic pressing. J Mach Manuf Reliab 37: 160–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aleksandrov SE, Grabko DZ, Shikimaka OA (2009) The determination of the thickness of a layer of intensive deformations in the vicinity of the friction surface in metal forming processes. J Mach Manuf Reliab 38: 277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alexandrov S, Lyamina E (2006) Prediction of fracture in the vicinity of friction surfaces in metal forming processes. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 47: 757–761

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyamina E, Alexandrov S, Grabco D, Shikimaka O (2007) An approach to prediction of evolution of material properties in the vicinity of frictional interfaces in metal forming. Key Eng Mater 345(346): 741–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexandrov SE, Lyamina EA (2011) On constructing the theory of ductile fracture near friction surfaces. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 52: 657–663

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Alexandrov S (2009) The strain rate intensity factor and its applications: a review. Mater Sci Forum 623: 1–20

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Alexandrov S, Jeng Y-R (2011) Influence of pressure-dependence of the yield criterion on the strain-rate-intensity factor. J Eng Math 71: 339–348

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y.-R. Jeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexandrov, S., Kuo, CY. & Jeng, YR. Effect of the shape of pressure-dependent yield surfaces on solution behaviour near frictional interfaces. J Eng Math 79, 143–152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9561-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9561-1

Keywords

Navigation