Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Threshold and No-Threshold Methods of Discrete Wavelet Filtering of Radar Signals

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

The efficiency of threshold and no-threshold wavelet noise filtering methods in processing radar signals is analyzed. Three methods of wavelet analysis are considered: a method with a general limit threshold for wavelet coefficients of detail; a method with a universal threshold for all wavelet decompositions; and a method without a threshold, based on zeroing the coefficients of detail at certain levels of the wavelet decomposition of the signal. The efficiency of wavelet filtering by the signal-to-noise ratio before and after filtering, signal entropy, and the model’s mean squared error (MSE) are evaluated. It is found that over a wide range of high noise from –12 dB to –7.5 dB, the common-threshold method provides more efficient noise filtering than the other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. G. V. Khudov, V. M. Lishchenko, and V. V. Gnyrya, “Signal processing in a multi-radar system based on two-coordinate survey radar stations,” Telekommunik. ta Inform. Tekhnologii, No. 4(69), 4–15 (2020).

  2. E. Ya. Vavruk, O. Lashko, and R. Popovych, Algorithms and Signal Processing Means [in Ukrainian], SPOLOM, Lviv (2021).

  3. D. O. Levchunets, “Detection of radar signals based on wavelet convolution analysis,” Proc. National Acad. of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, Ser. Military and Technical Sciences, No. 1, 237–243 (2015).

  4. I. V. Svyd and S. V. Starokozhev, “Distributed processing of radar information of airspace surveillance systems,” Radiotekhnika, Iss. 212, 155–165 (2023).

  5. O. A. Serkov, K. A. Trubchaninova, and B. O. Lazurenko, “Noise resistance of mobile telecommunication systems,” Control, Navigation, and Communication Systems: Collection of Scientific Works, No. 2(60), 169–172 (2020). https://doi.org/10.26906/SUNZ.2020.2.169.

  6. M. Walenczykowska, A. Kawalec, and K. Krenc, “An application of analytic wavelet transform and convolutional neural network for radar intrapulse modulation recognition,” Sensors, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1986 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23041986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. B. Zhirov, Yu. I. Khlaponin, and B. G. Zhirov, “Methods of analyzing the fine structure of non-stationary signals,” Coll. of Sci. Works of the Military Institute of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, No. 53, 21–30 (2016).

  8. N. Prashar, M. Sood, and S. Jain, “Design and implementation of a robust noise removal system in ECG signals using dual-tree complex wavelet transform,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Vol. 63, 102212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Osadchiy, A. Kamenev, V. Saharov, and S. Chernyi, “Signal processing algorithm based on discrete wavelet transform,” Designs, Vol. 5, No. 3, 41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/designs5030041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Nasri and H. Nezamabadi-pour, “Image denoising in the wavelet domain using a new adaptive thresholding function,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 72, Iss. 4–6, 1012–1025 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2008.04.016.

  11. B. Wang, G. Zhang, Z. Li, and Z. Whang, “Wavelet threshold denoising algorithm based on new threshold function,” J. Computer Applic., Vol. 34(5), 1499–1502 (2014). https://doi.org/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2014.05.1499.

  12. Yu. K. Taranenko, V. V. Lopatin, and O. Yu. Oliynyk, “Wavelet filtering by using nonthreshold method and example of model Doppler function,” Radioelectronics and Communications Systems, Vol. 64, No. 7, 380–389 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0735272721070049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. V. Bandeliuk and V. G. Kolobrodov, “Problems of choosing the mother wavelet to improve informativeness indicators in remote sensing problems,” in: Collection of Abstracts, 9th Sci. and Pract. Conf. of Students and Postgraduates “Looking into the Future of Instrument Engineering,” April 17–18, 2016, PBF, NTUU KPI, Kyiv (2016), p. 29.

  14. O. V. Lazorenko, S. V. Lazorenko, and L. F. Chernogor, “Wavelet analysis of model signals with special features. 1. Continuous wavelet transform,” Radiofizika i Radioastronomiya, Vol. 12, No. 2, 182–204 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. V. Matveev, D. Yu. Kryukov, Yu. S. Kuryan, and K. O. Levenkov, “Application of discrete wavelet transform for filtering additive noise in probing radar signals,” Bulletin of the Voronezh State Technical University, Vol. 10, No. 2, 43–46 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. O. Brown, V. P. Dolgushyn, V. N. Loza, and I. V. Pampukha, “Analyzing the possibilities and characteristics of noise reduction methods in signal processing based on wavelet technology,” Zhurnal Radioelektroniki, No. 7 (2014).

  17. V. I. Solodka, O. V. Osharovska, M. Patlayenko, and A. Podolska, “Formation of wavelet-transformation signals taking into account threshold functions in the problem of digital stream compression,” Bulletin of the Ukraina University, Ser. Informatics, Computer Technology and Cybernetics, No. 1(28), 186–197 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ya. D. Shirman, Theory and Technique of Processing Radar Information Against the Background of Interference [in Russian] Ripol Klassik, Moscow (1981).

  19. Y. E. Voskoboynikov, “Wavelet filtering with two-parameter threshold functions: function selection and estimation of optimal parameters,” Avtomatikai Progr. Inzheneriya, No. 1(15), 69–78 (2016).

  20. A. Hindi, M. O. Dwairi, and Z. Alqadi, “Analysis of digital signals using wavelet packet tree,” International J. of Computer Science and Mobile Computing. Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 96–103 (2020).

  21. Yu. K. Taranenko and O. Yu. Oliynyk, “Optimizing the algorithm of wavelet packet signal filtering,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 60, No. 1, 135–145 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-024-00654-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. O. Oliynyk and Yu. Taranenko, “Automated system for identification of data distribution laws by analysis of histogram proximity with sample reduction,” Ukrainian Metrological J., No. 3, 31–37 (2021).

  23. O. Oliynyk Y. Taranenko, D. Losikhin, and A. Shvachka, “Investigation of the Kalman filter in the noise field with an excellent Gaussian distribution,” East.-Eur. J. Enterp. Technol., Vol. 4, No. 4(94), 36–42 (2018).

  24. E. González-Estrada and W. Cosmes, “Shapiro–Wilk test for skew normal distributions based on data transformations,” J. Stat. Comput. Simul., Vol. 89, No. 17, 3258–3272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2019.1658763.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu. K. Taranenko, ��Methods of discrete wavelet filtering of measurement signals: An algorithm for choosing a method,” Measurement Techniques, Vol. 64(10), 801–808 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ya. A. Kremenetska, Yu. V. Melnyk, S. Yu. Markov, and N. V. Gradoboyeva, “Modeling of a radio communication channel of the millimeter wave range using RoF technology,” Scientific Notes of the Ukrainian Research Institute of Communications. No. 1, 41–50 (2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. K. Taranenko.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetyka ta Systemnyi Analiz, No. 4, July–August, 2024, pp. 168–179; https://doi.org/10.34229/KCA2522-9664.24.4.13.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taranenko, Y.K., Oliinyk, O.Y. Use of Threshold and No-Threshold Methods of Discrete Wavelet Filtering of Radar Signals. Cybern Syst Anal 60, 656–666 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-024-00704-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-024-00704-4

Keywords

Navigation