Skip to main content
Log in

Verification of Positive Definiteness

  • Published:
BIT Numerical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a computational, simple and fast sufficient criterion to verify positive definiteness of a symmetric or Hermitian matrix. The criterion uses only standard floating-point operations in rounding to nearest, it is rigorous, it takes into account all possible computational and rounding errors, and is also valid in the presence of underflow. It is based on a floating-point Cholesky decomposition and improves a known result. Using the criterion an efficient algorithm to compute rigorous error bounds for the solution of linear systems with symmetric positive definite matrix follows. A computational criterion to verify that a given symmetric or Hermitian matrix is not positive definite is given as well. Computational examples demonstrate the effectiveness of our criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. P. Brent, C. Percival, and P. Zimmermann, Error Bounds on complex floating-point multiplication, to appear in Math. Comput.

  2. L. Collatz, Einschließungssatz für die charakteristischen Zahlen von Matrizen, Math. Z., 48 (1942), pp. 221–226.

  3. J. W. Demmel, On floating point errors in Cholesky, LAPACK Working Note 14 CS-89–87, Department of Computer Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 1989.

  4. I. S. Duff, R. G. Grimes, and J. G. Lewis, User’s guide for Harwell–Boeing sparse matrix test problems collection, Technical Report RAL-92-086, Computing and Information Systems Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, UK, 1992.

  5. C. A. Floudas, Deterministic Global Optimization – Theory, Methods and Applications, Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 37, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 2000.

  6. N. J. Higham, Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms, 2nd edn, SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, 2002.

  7. R. A. Horn and C. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.

  8. MATLAB User’s Guide, Version 7. The MathWorks Inc., 2004.

  9. J. Rohn, Checking robust stability of symmetric interval matrices is NP-hard, Commentat. Math. Univ. Carol., 35 (1994), p. 795–797.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. M. Rump, Verification methods for dense and sparse systems of equations, in Topics in Validated Computations – Studies in Computational Mathematics, J. Herzberger, ed., p. 63–136, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994.

  11. S. M. Rump, INTLAB – INTerval LABoratory, in Developments in Reliable Computing, Tibor Csendes, ed., p. 77–104, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999.

  12. H. Rutishauser, Vorlesungen über numerische Mathematik. Band 1: Gleichungssysteme, Interpolation und Approximation. Band 2: Differentialgleichungen und Eigenwertprobleme, Mathematische Reihe, vol. 50/57, Birkhäuser, Basel–Stuttgart, 1976. English: Lectures on Numerical Analysis, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1990.

  13. R. S. Varga, Matrix Iterative Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1962.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.M. Rump.

Additional information

AMS subject classification (2000)

65G20, 15A18

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rump, S. Verification of Positive Definiteness. Bit Numer Math 46, 433–452 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-006-0056-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-006-0056-1

Key words

Navigation