A fixed point method for the linear complementarity problem arising from american option pricing

1. Black, F., Scholes, M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81(3): 637–654

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

2. Borici, A., Boulevard, K.Z.I., Albania, T., Lüthi, H.J. Fast solution of complementarity formulations in American put pricing. Journal of Computational Finance, 9(1): 63–81 (2005)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Brennan, M., Schwartz, E. The valuation of American put options. Journal of Finance, 32(2): 449–462 (1977)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

4. Brennan, M., Schwartz, E. Finite difference mehtods and jump processes arising in the pricing of congingent claims: A synthesis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13(3): 461–474 (1978)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Coleman, T.F., Li, Y.Y., Verma, A.A. A Newton method for American option pricing. Journal of Computational Finance, 5: 51–78 (2002)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Cottle, R.W., Pang, J.S., Stone, R.E. The Linear Complementarity Problem. Academic Press, Boston, 1992

   MATH  Google Scholar 

7. Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A., Rubinstein, M. Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3): 229–263 (1979)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

8. Ehrhardt, M., Mickens, R.E. A fast, stable and accurate numerical mehtod for the Black-Scholes equation of American options. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 11(5): 471–501 (2008)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

9. Han, H., Wu, X.N. A fast numerical mehtod for the Black-Scholes equation of American options. SIMA Journal on Numerical Analysis, 41(6): 2081–2095 (2004)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

10. Huang, J., Pang, J.S. Option pricing and linear complementarity. Journal of Computational Finance, 2: 31–60 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Ikonen, S., Toivanen, J. Operator splitting methods for American option pricing. Applied Mathematics Letters, 17(7): 809–814 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

12. Ikonen, S., Toivanen, J. Componentwise splitting methods for pricing American options under stochastic volatility. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 10(2): 331–361 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

13. Ikonen, S., Toivanen, J. Efficient numerical methods for pricing American options under stochastic volatility. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 24(1): 104–126 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

14. Jaillet, P., Lamberton, D., Laperyre, B. Variational inequality and the pricing of American option. ACAT Applicandae Matheematicae, 21(3): 263–289 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Koulisianis, M.D., Papatheodorou, T.S. Improving projected successive overrelaxation method for linear complementarity problems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 45(1): 29–40 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Nielsen, B.F., Skavhaug, O., Tveito, A. Penalty and front-fixing methods for the numerical solution of American option problems. Journal of Computational Finance, 5(4): 69–98 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Schwartz, E.S. The valuation of warrants: Implementing a new approach. Journal of Rinancial Economics, 4(1): 79–93 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Seydel, R.U. Tools for Computional Finance. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009

    MATH  Google Scholar 

19. Siddiqi, A.H., Manchanda, P., Kocvara, M. An iterative two-step algorithm for American option pricing. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 11(2): 71–84 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

20. Tangman, D.Y., Gopaul, A., Bhuruth, M. A fast high-order finite difference algorithm for pricing American options. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 222(1): 17–29 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

21. Tavella, D., Randall, C. Pricing Financial Instruments: The finite difference method. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2000

    Google Scholar 

22. Varga, R.S. Matrix Iterative Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1962

    Google Scholar 

23. Wang, S., Yang, X.Q., Teo, K.L. Power penalty method for a linear complementarity problem arising from American option valuation. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 129(2): 227–254 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

24. Zhao, J., Davison, M., Corless, R.M. Compact finite difference method for American option pricing. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 206(1): 306–321 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

25. Zvan, R., Forsyth, P.A., Vetzal, K.R. Penalty methods for American options with stochastic volatility. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 91(2): 199–218 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references