Abstract
The coupled chemotaxis fluid system
where \(S\in (C^2({\overline{\Omega }}\times [0,\infty )^2))^{N\times N}\), is considered in a bounded domain \(\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^N\), \(N\in \{2,3\}\), with smooth boundary. We show that it has global classical solutions if the initial data satisfy certain smallness conditions and give decay properties of these solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amann, H.: Compact embeddings of vector-valued Sobolev and Besov spaces. Glas. Mat. Ser. III 35(55)(1), 161–177 (2000) (Dedicated to the memory of Branko Najman)
Bellomo, N., Bellouquid, A., Tao, Y., Winkler, M.: Toward a mathematical theory of Keller-Segel models of pattern formation in biological tissues. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25(9), 1663–1763 (2015)
Cao, X.: Global bounded solutions of the higher-dimensional Keller-Segel system under smallness conditions in optimal spaces. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35, 1891–1904 (2015)
Cao, X., Ishida, S.: Global-in-time bounded weak solutions to a degenerate quasilinear Keller-Segel system with rotation. Nonlinearity 27(8), 1899–1913 (2014)
Chae, M., Kang, K., Lee, J.: Existence of smooth solutions to coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 33(6), 2271–2297 (2013)
Chae, M., Kang, K., Lee, J.: Global existence and temporal decay in Keller-Segel models coupled to fluid equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 39(7), 1205–1235 (2014)
Chamoun, G., Saad, M., Talhouk, R.: A coupled anisotropic chemotaxis-fluid model: the case of two-sidedly degenerate diffusion. Comput. Math. Appl. 68(9), 1052–1070 (2014)
Chung, Y.-S., Kang, K., Kim, J.: Global existence of weak solutions for a Keller-Segel-fluid model with nonlinear diffusion. J. Korean Math. Soc. 51(3), 635–654 (2014)
Di Francesco, M., Lorz, A., Markowich, P.: Chemotaxis-fluid coupled model for swimming bacteria with nonlinear diffusion: global existence and asymptotic behavior. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 28(4), 1437–1453 (2010)
DiLuzio, W.R., Turner, L., Mayer, M., Garstecki, P., Weibel, D.B., Berg, H.C., Whitesides, G.M.: Escherichia coli swim on the right-hand side. Nature 435(7046), 1271–1274 (2005)
Dombrowski, C., Cisneros, L., Chatkaew, S., Goldstein, R.E., Kessler, J.O.: Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098103 (2004)
Duan, R., Lorz, A., Markowich, P.: Global solutions to the coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 35(9), 1635–1673 (2010)
Duan, R., Xiang, Z.: A note on global existence for the chemotaxis-Stokes model with nonlinear diffusion. Int. Math. Res. Not. 7, 1833–1852 (2014)
Fujita, H., Kato, T.: On the Navier-Stokes initial value problem. I. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 16, 269–315 (1964)
Fujiwara, D., Morimoto, H.: An \(L_{r}\)-theorem of the Helmholtzdecomposition of vector fields. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 24(3), 685–700 (1977)
Giga, Y.: Analyticity of the semigroup generated by the Stokes operator in \(L_{r}\) spaces. Math. Z. 178(3), 297–329 (1981)
Giga, Y.: Solutions for semilinear parabolic equations in \(L^p\) and regularity of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes system. J. Differ. Equ. 62(2), 186–212 (1986)
Giga, Y., Miyakawa, T.: Solutions in \(L_r\) of the Navier-Stokes initial value problem. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 89(3), 267–281 (1985)
Giga, Y., Sohr, H.: Abstract \(L^p\) estimates for the Cauchy problem with applications to the Navier-Stokes equations in exterior domains. J. Funct. Anal. 102(1), 72–94 (1991)
Henry, D.: Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 840. Springer, Berlin (1981)
Hillen, T., Painter, K.J.: A user’s guide to PDE models for chemotaxis. J. Math. Biol. 58(1–2), 183–217 (2009)
Hillesdon, A., Pedley, T., Kessler, J.: The development of concentration gradients in a suspension of chemotactic bacteria. Bull. Math. Biol. 57(2), 299–344 (1995)
Horstmann, D.: From 1970 until present: the Keller-Segel model in chemotaxis and its consequences. I. Jahresber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. 105(3), 103–165 (2003)
Hu, B.: Blow-Up Theories for Semilinear Parabolic Equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2018. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Ishida, S.: Global existence and boundedness for chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes systems with position-dependent sensitivity in 2D bounded domains. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35(8), 3463–3482 (2015)
Ishida, S., Seki, K., Yokota, T.: Boundedness in quasilinear Keller-Segel systems of parabolic-parabolic type on non-convex bounded domains. J. Differ. Equ. 256(8), 2993–3010 (2014)
Jiang, J., Wu, H., Zheng, S.: Global existence and asymptotic behavior of solutions to a chemotaxis-fluid system on general bounded domains. Asymptot. Anal. 92(3–4), 249–258 (2015)
Keller, E.F., Segel, L.A.: Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J. Theor. Biol. 26(3), 399–415 (1970)
Kozono, H., Miura, M., Sugiyama, Y.: Existence and uniqueness theorem on mild solutions to the Keller–Segel system coupled with the Navier–Stokes fluid (2014) (preprint)
Ladyženskaja, O.A., Solonnikov, V.A., Ural’ceva, N.N.: Linear and quasilinear equations of parabolic type. In: Translated from the Russian by S. Smith. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 23. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1968)
Ladyzhenskaya, O.A., Ural’tseva, N.N.: Linear and quasilinear elliptic equations. In: Translated from the Russian by Scripta Technica, Inc. Translation editor: Leon Ehrenpreis. Academic Press, New York (1968)
Lauga, E., DiLuzio, W.R., Whitesides, G.M., Stone, H.A.: Swimming in circles: motion of bacteria near solid boundaries. Biophys. J. 90(2), 400–412 (2006)
Li, T., Suen, A., Winkler, M., Xue, C.: Global small-data solutions of a two-dimensional chemotaxis system with rotational flux terms. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25(4), 721–746 (2015)
Lieberman, G.M.: Hölder continuity of the gradient of solutions of uniformly parabolic equations with conormal boundary conditions. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 4(148), 77–99 (1987)
Liu, J.-G., Lorz, A.: A coupled chemotaxis-fluid model: global existence. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 28(5), 643–652 (2011)
Lorz, A.: Coupled chemotaxis fluid model. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20(6), 987–1004 (2010)
Metcalfe, A., Pedley, T.: Bacterial bioconvection: weakly nonlinear theory for pattern selection. J. Fluid Mech. 370, 249–270 (1998)
Mizoguchi, N., Souplet, P.: Nondegeneracy of blow-up points for theparabolic Keller–Segel system. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 31(4), 851–875 (2014)
Othmer, H.G., Hillen, T.: The diffusion limit of transport equations ii: chemotaxis equations. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 62(4), 1222–1250 (2002)
Porzio, M.M., Vespri, V.: Hölder estimates for local solutions of some doubly nonlinear degenerate parabolic equations. J. Differ. Equ. 103(1), 146–178 (1993)
Simader, C.G.: The weak Dirichlet and Neumann problem for the Laplacian in \(L^q\) for bounded and exterior domains. Applications. In: Nonlinear Analysis, Function Spaces and Applications, vol. 4 (Roudnice nad Labem, 1990) Teubner-Texte Math., vol. 119, pp. 180–223. Teubner, Leipzig (1990)
Simon, J.: Compact sets in the space \(L^p(0, T;B)\). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 4(146), 65–96 (1987)
Sohr, H.: The Navier–Stokes Equations: An Elementary Functional Analytic Approach. Birkhäuser Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrbücher. [Birkhäuser Advanced Texts: Basel Textbooks]. Birkhäuser, Basel (2001)
Sokolov, A., Goldstein, R.E., Feldchtein, F.I., Aranson, I.S.: Enhanced mixing and spatial instability in concentrated bacterial suspensions. Phys. Rev. E 80, 031903 (2009)
Solonnikov, V.A.: Schauder estimates for the evolutionary generalized Stokes problem. Nonlinear Equations and Spectral Theory. American Mathematical Society Translations: Series 2, vol. 220, pp.165–200. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2007)
Tan, Z., Zhang, X.: Decay estimates of the coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations in \(R^3\). J. Math. Anal. Appl. 410(1), 27–38 (2014)
Tao, Y., Winkler, M.: Global existence and boundedness in a Keller-Segel-Stokes model with arbitrary porous medium diffusion. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 32(5), 1901–1914 (2012)
Tao, Y., Winkler, M.: Locally bounded global solutions in athree-dimensional chemotaxis-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 30(1), 157–178 (2013)
Triebel, H.: Theory of Function Spaces. Monographs in Mathematics, vol. 78. Birkhäuser, Basel (1983)
Tuval, I., Cisneros, L., Dombrowski, C., Wolgemuth, C.W., Kessler, J.O., Goldstein, R.E.: Bacterial swimming and oxygen transport near contact lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(7), 2277–2282 (2005)
Vorotnikov, D.: Weak solutions for a bioconvection model related to Bacillus subtilis. Commun. Math. Sci. 12(3), 545–563 (2014)
Wang, Y., Cao, X.: Global classical solutions of a 3D chemotaxis-Stokes system with rotation. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 20(9), 3235–3254 (2015)
Wang, Y., Xiang, Z.: Global existence and boundedness in a Keller-Segel-Stokes system involving a tensor-valued sensitivity with saturation. J. Differ. Equ. 259(12), 7578–7609 (2015)
Wiegner, M.: The Navier-Stokes equations-a neverending challenge? Jahresber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. 101(1), 1–25 (1999)
Winkler,M.: Global weak solutions in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier–Stokes system. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire. doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2015.05.002
Winkler, M.: How far do chemotaxis-driven forces influence regularity in the Navier–Stokes system? Trans. Am. Math. Soc. (to appear). arXiv:1506.05592
Winkler, M.: Large-data global generalized solutions in a chemotaxis system with tensor-valued sensitivities. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 47(4), 3092–3115 (2015)
Winkler, M.: A two-dimensional chemotaxis-Stokes system with rotational flux: global solvability, eventual smoothness and stabilization (preprint)
Winkler, M.: Aggregation vs. global diffusive behavior in the higher-dimensional Keller-Segel model. J. Differ. Equ. 248(12), 2889–2905 (2010)
Winkler, M.: Global large-data solutions in a chemotaxis-(Navier-)Stokes system modeling cellular swimming in fluid drops. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 37(2), 319–351 (2012)
Winkler, M.: Stabilization in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 211(2), 455–487 (2014)
Winkler, M.: Boundedness and large time behavior in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion and general sensitivity. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 54(4), 3789–3828 (2015)
Xue, C.: Macroscopic equations for bacterial chemotaxis: integration of detailed biochemistry of cell signaling. J. Math. Biol. 70(1–2), 1–44 (2015)
Xue, C., Budrene, E.O., Othmer, H.G.: Radial and spiral streamformation in proteus mirabilis colonies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7(12), e1002332, 12 (2011)
Xue, C., Othmer, H.G.: Multiscale models of taxis-driven patterning in bacterial populations. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70(1), 133–167 (2009)
Ye, X.: Existence and decay of global smooth solutions to the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 427(1), 60–73 (2015)
Zhang, Q., Li, Y.: Convergence rates of solutions for a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 20, 2751–2759 (2015)
Zhang, Q., Li, Y.: Global weak solutions for the three-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion. J. Differ. Equ. 259(8), 3730–3754 (2015)
Zhang, Q., Zheng, X.: Global well-posedness for the two-dimensional incompressible chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 46(4), 3078–3105 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Y. Giga.
Appendix A
Appendix A
We have postponed the proof of Lemma 2.4, which mainly consists in elementary calculus, but is too central to the reasoning of the present work to be left unproven. We begin the Appendix by giving this proof. After that, we will take care of a result on the Helmholtz projection, which was used as tool in the proof of Lemma 5.7. Finally, this appendix contains a variant of Lemma 3.1 adapted to the needs of the proof of Theorem 1.2.
Proof of Lemma 2.4
The assertion can be proven similarly as in [59, Lemma 1.2]. A simple observation shows that for any \(t\in [0,\infty )\)
In order to obtain estimates for the summands, independently of the values of \(\alpha , \beta , \gamma , \delta \), we can start with
and continue by estimating
Also in the third term on the right hand side of (A.1) we can split the integral and use the obvious estimates \((t-s)^{-\beta }\le 1\) for \(s<t-1\) and \(e^{-(\gamma \!-\!\delta )(t-\sigma )}\!\le \! e^{-(\gamma \!-\!\delta )(-\sigma )}{\le }e^{\gamma -\delta }\) for \(\sigma \in (0,1)\) to obtain
for any \(t\in [0,\infty )\). The last integral can be rewritten as
where we have
so that (A.2) yields the estimate we are aiming for if \(1-\alpha -\beta \le 0\) or if \(t<1\) and \(1-\alpha -\beta >0\). As to \(1-\alpha -\beta >0\) and \(t\ge 1\), we estimate
Here,
where we have
because \(t\ge 1\), and hence
which in combination with the finiteness of \( \sup _{t>0} te^{-\frac{\eta }{2} t^\eta } \) implies the assertion. \(\square \)
In order to obtain regularity of u, we have employed the following result in the proof of Lemma 5.7. Other than in [15], we are concerned with the impact of the Helmholtz projection on Hölder-continuous functions (instead of on functions belonging to some \(L^p\)-space only.)
Lemma A.1
Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^N\) be a bounded domain with \(\partial \Omega \in C^{1+\alpha }\) for some \(\alpha >0,\) and let \(T>0\). Moreover let \(u\in C^{\alpha ,\frac{\alpha }{2}}(\overline{\Omega }\times [0,T])\) and \(u=v+w,\) where \(\nabla \cdot v=0\) in \(\Omega \) and \(v\cdot \nu =0\) on \(\partial \Omega \) and \(w=\nabla \Phi \) for some function \(\Phi \). Then \(v\in C^{\alpha ,\frac{\alpha }{2}}(\overline{\Omega }\times [0,T])\).
Proof
We have to find a decomposition \(u=v+w\) with \(\nabla \cdot v=0\) in \(\Omega \) and \(v\cdot \nu =0\) on \(\partial \Omega \) and \(w=\nabla \Phi \) for some function \(\Phi \). We will construct w and conclude from its smoothness that \(\mathscr {P}u=v=u-w\in C^{\alpha ,\frac{\alpha }{2}}(\overline{\Omega }\times [0,T];\mathbb {R}^{N})\). As preparation let us consider the elliptic problem
Only assuming \(f\in C^\alpha (\overline{\Omega };\mathbb {R}^N)\), we fix \(p>N\) and let q be such that \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1\). Then [41, Thm. 4.1], which mirrors the usual Lax–Milgram type result in the context of \(L^p\)-spaces also for \(p\ne 2\), asserts the existence of a unique weak solution \(\Phi \!\in \! \{\Phi \!\in \! W^{1,p}(\Omega ), \int _\Omega \Phi =0\}\) such that
Moreover, this solution satisfies
with positive constants \(c_1\), \(c_2\), \(c_3\) and \(c_4\) that are guaranteed to exist by the continuity of the embedding \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\hookrightarrow L^\infty (\Omega )\), Poincaré’s inequality, [41, Thm. 4.1] and continuity of the embedding \(C^{\alpha }(\Omega )\hookrightarrow L^p(\Omega )\), respectively. A standard elliptic regularity result (see [24, Thm. 2.8]) moreover asserts the existence of \(c_5>0\) such that \(C^{1+\alpha }\)-solutions \(\Phi \) of (A.3) satisfy
and thus, taking into account (A.4),
with \(c_6:=c_5(1 + \frac{c_4}{c_1})\).
Approximating \(f\in C^\alpha (\overline{\Omega })\) by a sequence of functions \(\{f_n\}_{n\in \mathbb {N}}\subset C^\infty (\overline{\Omega })\) for which the existence of classical solutions \(\Phi _n\in C^{2+\alpha }(\overline{\Omega })\) is asserted by well-known results [31, Thm. 3.3.2], we see that for \(f\in C^\alpha (\overline{\Omega })\) problem (A.3) has a unique solution \(\Phi \in C^{1+\alpha }(\overline{\Omega })\), which moreover satisfies
For each t let \(\Phi (\cdot ,t)\) denote the solution of
and define \(w(\cdot ,t):=\nabla \Phi (\cdot ,t)\) and \(v(\cdot ,t):=u(\cdot ,t)-w(\cdot ,t)\), so that clearly \(\nabla \cdot v=\nabla \cdot u-\nabla \cdot w=\nabla \cdot u-\Delta \Phi =0\) in \(\Omega \) and \(v\cdot \nu =u\cdot \nu -w\cdot \nu =u\cdot \nu -\partial _\nu \Phi =0\) on \(\partial \Omega \). Concerning smoothness, we see that \(\Phi (\cdot ,t)\in C^{1+\alpha }(\overline{\Omega })\) entails \(w(\cdot ,t)\in C^{\alpha }(\overline{\Omega })\) and for \(t_1,t_2\in [0,T]\) we have that \(\Phi (\cdot ,t_2)-\Phi (\cdot ,t_1)={:}\Psi \) solves
so that by (A.5)
By the known regularity of u, in conclusion we have \(w\in C^{\alpha ,\frac{\alpha }{2}}(\overline{\Omega }\times [0,T])\) and thus \(\mathscr {P}u=v=u-w\in C^{\alpha ,\frac{\alpha }{2}}(\overline{\Omega }\times [0,T];\mathbb {R}^N)\). \(\square \)
The last statement we have postponed to this appendix is concerned with the adaptations necessary for proving Theorem 1.2 instead of Theorem 1.1.
Lemma A.2
Given \(M, N, p_0, q_0, \beta , C_S\) as in Theorem 1.2 and some \(\delta >0,\) it is possible to choose \(M_1,\) \(M_2,\) \(M_3,\) \(M_4,\) \(\varepsilon >0,\) \(m_0<\varepsilon |\Omega |^{-\frac{1}{p_0}}\) such that for all \(m>m_0,\) for all \(\alpha _1\in (\frac{m}{2},\min \{m,\lambda _1-\delta \})\) and \(\alpha _2\in (0,\min \{\alpha _1,\lambda _1'-\delta \})\) the inequalities
hold, where \(k_1,\) \(k_2,\) \(k_3,\) \(k_4,\) \(k_5(\cdot ),\) \(k_7(\cdot ,\cdot ),\) \(k_8(\cdot ,\cdot )\) are taken from Lemmata 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3, and \(C_1,\) \(C_2,\) \(C_3,\) \(C_4,\) \(C_5,\) \(C_6,\) \(C_7\) are the constants defined in Sect. 3.
Proof
The condition \(m_0<\varepsilon |\Omega |^{-\frac{1}{p_0}}\) that is used to ensure the existence of initial data satisfying (1.8) compels us to choose \(m_0\) at the end of this proof, quite in contrast to the situation in Lemma 3.1. Furthermore this makes it necessary to have the estimates during the proof hold regardless of the values of \(\alpha _1\), \(\alpha _2\), which depend on m. Fortunately, \(C_1, \ldots , C_7\) indeed do not depend on \(\alpha _1\), \(\alpha _2\) (and thus not on m), but—thanks to Lemma 2.4—rather on (a lower bound for) the differences between \(\mu \) and \(\alpha _1\), \(\mu \) and \(\alpha _2\) or \(\lambda _1\) and \(\alpha _1\). (This is the purpose \(\delta \) has been introduced for.) The only remaining parameter is \(\sigma =\sigma (\alpha _1)=\int _0^\infty (1+s^{-\frac{N}{2p_0}}) e^{-\alpha _1 s} ds\), which is decreasing with respect to \(\alpha _1\). If we decide to concentrate on relatively “large” values of \(\alpha _1\) only, namely \(\alpha _1>\frac{m}{2}\), (which is of no effect to the generality of Theorem 1.2), given \(m>0\), for any \(\alpha _1\in (\frac{m}{2},\min \{m,\lambda _1-\delta \})\), we may rely on
We pick arbitrary \(M_1>0\) and
Moreover, we can choose \(M_2\) such that \(k_3+C_5k_2(|\Omega |^{-\frac{1}{p_0}}+M_1+2k_1)Me^{A}A \le \frac{M_2}{4}\) and \(M_3\) such that \(k_7(N,q_0)+k_5(q_0)k_7(q_0,q_0)(M_1+2k_1)\Vert \nabla \Phi \Vert _{L^\infty (\Omega )} C_1\le \frac{M_3}{4}\), and we choose \(M_4\) such that \(k_8(N,N)+k_8(N,N)k_5(N)|\Omega |^{\frac{q_0-N}{Nq_0}}(M_1+2k_1)\Vert \nabla \Phi \Vert _{L^\infty (\Omega )}C_3\le \frac{M_4}{4}\). Then we let
Finally, we want to choose \(m_0<\varepsilon |\Omega |^{-\frac{1}{p_0}}\) such that \((M_1+2k_1)\sigma (\alpha _1)\varepsilon <A\) for all \(\alpha _1\in ( \frac{m}{2},\min \{m,\lambda _1-\delta \})\), for all \(m>m_0\). This is indeed feasible, since \(\sigma (\frac{\varepsilon }{2}|\Omega |^{-\frac{1}{p_0}})<\frac{A}{(M_1+2k_1)\varepsilon }\) due to
and by continuity we can find \(m_0<\varepsilon |\Omega |^{-\frac{1}{p_0}}\) so that \(\sigma (\frac{m_0}{2})<\frac{A}{(M_1+2k_1)\varepsilon }\). With this choice, for all \(\alpha _1\in ( \frac{m}{2},\min \{m,\lambda _1-\delta \})\), for all \(m>m_0\), we have \(\sigma (\alpha _1)<\sigma (\frac{m}{2})<\sigma (\frac{m_0}{2})<\frac{A}{(M_1+2k_1)\varepsilon }\). \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, X., Lankeit, J. Global classical small-data solutions for a three-dimensional chemotaxis Navier–Stokes system involving matrix-valued sensitivities. Calc. Var. 55, 107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-016-1027-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-016-1027-2