Abstract
Group decision-making (GDM) is a complex process. The diversity, discrimination, and inevitable uncertainty due to human intervention characterize such problems that add to this complexity. To circumvent this challenge, there is an urge for an appropriate knowledge representation and decision-making approaches. The present paper is concerned with a prescriptive approach to GDM that can aid a group of decision-makers (DMs) to arrive at a decision. To this end, the recent concept of probabilistic linguistic term set is utilized. The discrimination among the alternatives, as in the real world, are mimicked using an integrated framework that adopts CRITIC and variance methods for attribute weight calculation, Gini index for calculating the weights of DMs, Maclaurin symmetric mean for aggregating preferences, and weighted distance-based approximation for prioritization of alternatives. A real-world problem on electric bike selection illustrates the usefulness of the proposed work. Finally, comparative analysis with extant methods demonstrates the technical results, and it is inferred that the proposed work is (i) highly consistent (from Spearman correlation) and (ii) produces broad rank values (from standard deviation) that could be efficiently discriminated for rational decision-making and backup management during critical situations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aggarwal M (2016) Linguistic discriminative aggregation in multicriteria decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31:529–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/int
Aggarwal M (2017) Adaptive linguistic weighted aggregation operators for multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput J 58:690–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.063
Amin F, Fahmi A, Abdullah S, Ali A, Ahmad R, Ghani F (2018) Triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their application in group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 34(4):2401–2416. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-171567
Amin F, Fahmi A, Abdullah S (2019) Dealer using a new trapezoidal cubic hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS method and application to group decision-making program. Soft Comput 23(14):5353–5366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3476-3
Chien CF, Chen LF (2008) Data mining to improve personnel selection and enhance human capital: a case study in high-technology industry. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.09.003
Deepa N, Ganesan K, Srinivasan K, Chang CY (2019) Realizing sustainable development via modified integrated weighting MCDM model for Ranking Agrarian Dataset. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(21):6060. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216060
Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Comput Oper Res 22(7):763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
Fahmi Aliya, Amin F (2019) Precursor selection for sol–gel synthesis of titanium carbide nanopowders by a new hesitant CUBIC fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making model. New Math Natu Comput 15(1):145–167. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793005719500091
Fahmi Aliya, Abdullah S, Amin F, Siddiqui N, Ali A (2017) Aggregation operators on triangular cubic fuzzy numbers and its application to multi-criteria decision making problems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(6):3323–3337. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-162007
Fahmi Aliya, Abdullah S, Amin F, Khan MSA (2018a) Trapezoidal cubic fuzzy number Einstein hybrid weighted averaging operators and its application to decision making. Soft Comput 2017:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3242-6
Fahmi Aliya, Amin F, Abdullah S, Ali A (2018b) Cubic fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators and its application to decision-making. Int J Syst Sci 49(11):2385–2397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2018.1503356
Fahmi Aliya, Amin F, Smarandache F, Khan M, Hassan N (2018c) Triangular cubic hesitant fuzzy Einstein hybrid weighted averaging operator and its application to decision making. Symmetry 10(11):658. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110658
Fahmi A, Abdullah S, Amin F, Ali A, Ahmad R, Shakeel M (2019a) Trapezoidal cubic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their application in group decision-making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(4):3619–3635. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181703
Fahmi Aliya, Abdullah S, Amin F (2019b) Cubic uncertain linguistic powered Einstein aggregation operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Math Sci 13(2):129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-019-0285-5
Fahmi Aliya, Abdullah S, Amin F, Aslam M, Hussain S (2020) Trapezoidal linguistic cubic fuzzy TOPSIS method and application in a group decision making program. J Intell Syst 29(1):1283–1300. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2017-0560
Gou X, Xu Z (2016) Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 372:407–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.034
Hafezalkotob A, Hafezalkotob A (2016) Fuzzy entropy-weighted MULTIMOORA method for materials selection. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31(3):1211–1226. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-162186
Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2012) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Vasa. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20010316)40:6%3c9823:AID-ANIE9823%3e3.3.CO;2-C
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1995) A sequential selection process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment approach. Inf Sci 239(1995):223–239
Kao C (2010) Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis. Appl Math Model 34(7):1779–1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.09.022
Kobina A, Liang D, He X (2017) Probabilistic linguistic power aggregation operators for multi-criteria group decision making. Symmetry 9(12):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9120320
Koksalmis E, Kabak Ö (2018) Deriving decision makers’ weights in group decision making: an overview of objective methods. Inf Fusion. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFFUS.2018.11.009
Liao H, Jiang L, Xu Z, Xu J, Herrera F (2017a) A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information. Inf Sci 416:341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.06.035
Liao H, Xu Z, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2017b) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in decision making: a state-of-the-art survey. Int J Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0432-9
Liao H, Mi X, Xu Z (2019) A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 19(81):134
Liu P, Li Y (2019) Multi-attribute decision making method based on generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean aggregation operators for probabilistic linguistic information. Comput Ind Eng 131(April):282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.004
Liu P, Teng F (2018) Some Muirhead mean operators for probabilistic linguistic term sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision-making. Appl Soft Comput J 68:396–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.027
Liu P, Teng F (2019) Probabilistic linguistic TODIM method for selecting products through online product reviews. Inf Sci 485:441–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.022
Liu P, Wang Y (2019) Intuitionistic fuzzy interaction Hamy mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Group Decis Negot 28(1):197–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9601-y
Maclaurin C (1729) A second Letter to martin folkes, esq., concerning the roots of equations with demonstration of other roots of algebra. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 36:59–96
Mesiarova-Zemankova A, Kelly S, Ahmad K (2018) Bonferroni mean with weighted interaction. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(5):3085–3096. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2792475
Pang Q, Wang H, Xu Z (2016) Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 369:128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021
Peng X, Li W (2019) Algorithms for interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy sets in emergency decision making based on multiparametric similarity measures and WDBA. IEEE Access 7:7419–7441. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2890097
Peng JJ, Wang JQ, Yang LJ, Qian J (2017) A novel multi-criteria group decision-making approach using simplified neutrosophic information. Int J Uncertain Quantif 7(4):355–376. https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2017020126
Peng X, Zhang X, Luo Z (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09780-x
Rao RV, Singh D (2012) Weighted Euclidean distance based approach as a multiple attribute decision making method for plant or facility layout design selection. Int J Ind Eng Comput 3(3):365–382. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.01.003
Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Sałabun W, Palczewski K, Wątróbski J (2019) Multicriteria approach to sustainable transport evaluation under incomplete knowledge: electric bikes case study. Sustainability 11(12):3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123314
Sanayei A, Farid Mousavi S, Yazdankhah A (2010) Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 37(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063
Spearman C (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol 15(1):72–101
Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(2):529–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/int
Tuş A, Aytaç Adalı E (2019) The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem. Opsearch 56(2):528–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-019-00371-6
Vujicic M, Papic M, Blagojevic M (2017) Comparative analysis of objective techniques for criteria weighing in two MCDM methods on example of an air conditioner selection. Tehnika 72(3):422–429. https://doi.org/10.5937/tehnika1703422v
Wang X, He L, Zhu K, Zhang S, Xin L, Xu W, Guan Y (2019) An integrated model to evaluate the impact of social support on improving self-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19(1):2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0914-9
Wu X, Liao H (2018) An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Inf Fusion 43:13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.11.008
Xie W, Xu Z, Ren Z, Wang H (2018) Probabilistic linguistic analytic hierarchy process and its application on the performance assessment of Xiongan new area. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 16:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622017500420
Yin Q, Niu K, Li N (2018) Using cv-critic to determine weights for smart city evaluation. In: Proceedings—International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI, 2017-November, pp 996–1000. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2017.00153
Zhang G, Dong Y, Xu Y (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17(1):46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2012.01.006
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by University Grants Commission (UGC), India (Grant No: F./2015-17/RGNF-2015-17-TAM-83), and Department of Science and Technology (DST), India (Grant No: SR/FST/ETI-349/2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors of this research paper declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any authors.
Additional information
Communicated by V. Loia.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishankumar, R., Rani, P., Ravichandran, K.S. et al. An integrated and discriminative approach for group decision-making with probabilistic linguistic information. Soft Comput 25, 3043–3057 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05361-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05361-1