Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Row orientation effect on UV-B, UV-A and PAR solar irradiation components in vineyards at Tuscany, Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Besides playing an essential role in plant photosynthesis, solar radiation is also involved in many other important biological processes. In particular, it has been demonstrated that ultraviolet (UV) solar radiation plays a relevant role in grapevines (Vitis vinifera) in the production of certain important chemical compounds directly responsible for yield and wine quality. Moreover, the exposure to UV-B radiation (280–320 nm) can affect plant–disease interaction by influencing the behaviour of both pathogen and host. The main objective of this research was to characterise the solar radiative regime of a vineyard, in terms of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and UV components. In this analysis, solar spectral UV irradiance components, broadband UV (280–400 nm), spectral UV-B and UV-A (320–400 nm), the biological effective UVBE, as well as the PAR (400–700 nm) component, were all considered. The diurnal patterns of these quantities and the UV-B/PAR and UV-B/UV-A ratios were analysed to investigate the effect of row orientation of the vineyard in combination with solar azimuth and elevation angles. The distribution of PAR and UV irradiance at various heights of the vertical sides of the rows was also studied. The results showed that the highest portion of plants received higher levels of daily radiation, especially the UV-B component. Row orientation of the vines had a pronounced effect on the global PAR received by the two sides of the rows and, to a lesser extent, UV-A and UV-B. When only the diffused component was considered, this geometrical effect was greatly attenuated. UV-B/PAR and UV-A/PAR ratios were also affected, with potential consequences on physiological processes. Because of the high diffusive capacity of the UV-B radiation, the UV-B/PAR ratio was significantly lower on the plant portions exposed to full sunlight than on those in the shade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alados I, Alados-Arboledas L (1999) Direct and diffuse Photosynthetically active radiation: measurements and modelling. Agric For Meteorol 93:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist J, Dokoozlian N, Ebisuda N (2001) Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the central San Joaquin Valley of California. Am J Enol Vitic 52:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomelli A, Mercier L, Franchel K, Baillieul F, Benizri E, Mauro MC (2004) Response of grapevine defenses to UV-C exposure. Am J Enol Vitic 55:51–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell MM, Teramura AH, Tevini M (1989) The changing solar ultraviolet climate and ecological consequences for higher plants. Trends Ecol Evol 4:363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell MM, Björn LO, Bornmann JF, Flint SD, Kulandaivelu G, Teramura AH, Tevini M (1998) Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial ecosystems. J Photochem Photobiol B 46:40–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cartechini A, Paliotti A (1995) Effect of shading on vine morphology and productivity and leaf gas exchange characteristics in grapevines in the field. Am J Enol Vitic 46:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Cen YP, Bornnam J (1993) The effect of exposure to enhanced UV-B radiation on the penetration of monochromatic and plychromatic UV-B radiation in leaves of Brassica napus. Physiol Plant 87:249–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai GH, Andary C, Mondolotcosson L, Boubals D (1995) Involvement of phenolic-compounds in the resistance of grapevine callus to downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola). Eur J Plant Pathol 101:541–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deckmyn G, Impens I (1997) The ratio UV-B/photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) determines the sensitivity of rye to increased UV-B radiation. Environ Exper Bot 37:3–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deckmyn G, Cayenberghs E, Ceulemans R (2001) UV-B and PAR in single and mixed canopies grown under different UV-B exclusions in the field. Plant Ecol 154:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye DA (2004) Spectral composition and quanta-to-energy ratio of diffuse Photosynthetically active radiation under diverse cloud conditions. J Geophys Res 109, doi:D10203 10.1029/2003JD004251

  • Ensminger PA (1993) Control development in plants and fungi by far-UV radiation. Physiol Plant 88:501–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feister U, Grewe R (1995) Spectral albedo measurements in the UV and visible regions over different types of surfaces. Photochem Photobiol 62(4):736–744 doi:10.1111/j.1751–1097.1995.tb08723.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flint SD, Caldwell MM (1998) Solar UV-B and visible radiation in tropical forest gaps: measurements partitioning direct and diffuse radiation. Global Change Biol 4:863–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint SD, Caldwell MM (2003) A biological spectral weighting function for ozone depletion research with higher plants. Physiol Plant 117:137–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RH (1997) Partitioning of biologically active radiation in plant canopies. Int J Biometeorol 40:26–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grifoni D, Carreras G, Sabatini F, Zipoli G (2005) UV hazard on a summer’s day under Mediterranean conditions, and the protective role of a beach umbrella. Int J Biometeorol 50:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hess M, Koepke P (2007) UVI on arbitrarily oriented surfaces: effects of sky line and shadow. Proceedings of “One Century of UV Radiation Research”, 18–20 September, Davos, Switzerland

  • Jacovides CP, Tymvios FS, Assimakopoulos VD, Kaltsounides NA (2007) The dependence of global and diffuse PAR radiation components on sky conditions at Athens, Greece. Agric For Meteorol 143:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen MAK (2002) Ultraviolet-B radiation effects on plants: induction of morphogenic responses. Physiol Plant 116:423–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jersch S, Scherer C, Huth G, Schlösser E (1989) Proanthocyanidis as basis for quiescence of Botrytis cinerea in immature strawberry fruits. J Plant Dis Protect 96:365–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kakani VG, Reddy KR, Zhao D, Sailaja K (2003) Field crop responses to ultraviolet-B radiation: a review. Agric For Meteorol 120:191–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasten F (1986) Field instruments for solar radiation measurements. In: Guzzi R, Justus CG (eds) Physical climatology for solar and wind energy. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 438–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortekamp A, Wind R, Zyprian E (1998) Investigation of the interaction of Plasmopara viticola with susceptible and resistant grapevine cultivars. J Plant Dis Protect 105:475–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Gitz DC, McClure W (1995) Effects of UV-B on flavonoids, ferulic acid, growth and photosynthesis in barley primary leaves. Physiol Plant 93:725–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning WJ, Tiedemann AV (1995) Climate change, potential effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone (O3) and ultraviolet-B radiation on plant diseases. Environ Pollut 88:219–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCree KJ (1972) Test of current definitions of photosynthetically active radiation against leaf photosynthesis data. Agric Meteorol 10:443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misson L, Lunden M, McKay M, Goldstein AH (2005) Atmospheric aerosol light scattering and surface wetness influence the diurnal pattern of net ecosystem exchange in a semi-arid ponderosa pine plantation. Agric For Meteorol 129:60–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez-Olivera E, Martínez-Abaigar J, Tomás R, Otero S, Arróniz-Crespo M (2006) Physiological effects of solar ultraviolet-B exclusion on two cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. from La Rioja, Spain. Am J Enol Vitic 57:441–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson LC, Veit M, Weissonbock G, Bornmann JF (1998) Differential flavonoid response to enhanced UV-B radiation in Brassica napus. Phytochemistry 4:1021–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi AV, Wong JCF, Randall C (1998) Simultaneous assessment of photosynthetically active and ultraviolet solar radiation. Agric For Meteorol 92:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul ND (2000) Stratospheric ozone depletion, UV-B radiation and crop disease. Short survey. Environ Pollut 108:343–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pezet R, Pont V (1992) Differing biochemical and histological studies of two grape cultivars in the view of their respective susceptibility and resistance to Botrytis cinerea. In: Verhoeff K, Maltrakis NE, Williamson B (eds) Recent advances in Botrytis research. Pudoc, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz HR, Löhnertz O, Bettner W, Bálo B, Linsemmeier A, Jähnisch A, Müller M, Gaubatz B, Váradi G (1998) Is grape composition affected by current levels of UV-B radiation? Vitis 37:191–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shulski MD, Walter-Shea EA, Hubbard KG, Yuen GY, Horst G (2004) Penetration of photosynthetically active radiation and ultraviolet radiation into alfalfa and tall Fescue canopies. Agron J 96:1562–1571

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb AR, Weihs P, Blumthaler M (1999) Spectral UV irradiance on vertical surfaces: a case study. Photochem Photobiol 69:464–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Annalena Puglisi for her technical assistance in field measurements and Giuseppe Torzillo for making the PAR meter available.

We would like to thank the Mondeggi-Lappeggi and Poggio Casciano farms where the measurements were taken and Sandra Corsi for her contribution to proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Grifoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grifoni, D., Carreras, G., Zipoli, G. et al. Row orientation effect on UV-B, UV-A and PAR solar irradiation components in vineyards at Tuscany, Italy. Int J Biometeorol 52, 755–763 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-008-0168-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-008-0168-1

Keywords

Navigation