Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the passage to hydrodynamic equations for kinetic models of opinion formation. The considered kinetic models feature an opinion density depending on an additional microscopic variable, identified with the personal preference. This variable describes an opinion-driven polarisation process, leading finally to a choice among some possible options, as it happens, e.g. in referendums or elections. Like in the kinetic theory of rarefied gases, the derivation of hydrodynamic equations is based on the computation of the local equilibrium distribution of the opinions from the underlying kinetic model. Several numerical examples validate the resulting model, shedding light on the crucial role played by the distinction between opinion and preference formation on the choice processes in multi-agent societies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albi, G., Pareschi, L., Toscani, G., Zanella, M.: Recent advances in opinion modeling: control and social influence. In: Bellomo, N., Degond, P., Tadmor, E. (eds.) Active Particles Volume 1, Theory, Methods, and Applications, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser, Basel (2016)
Albi, G., Pareschi, L., Zanella, M.: Opinion dynamics over complex networks: kinetic modelling and numerical methods. Kinet. Relat. Models 10(1), 1–32 (2017)
Aletti, G., Naldi, G., Toscani, G.: First-order continuous models of opinion formation. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 67(3), 837–853 (2007)
Anteneodo, C., Crokidakis, N.: Symmetry breaking by heating in a continuous opinion model. Phys. Rev. E 95(4), 042308 (2017)
Ben-Naim, E.: Opinion dynamics: rise and fall of political parties. Europhys. Lett. 69(5), 671–677 (2005)
Ben-Naim, E., Krapivsky, P.L., Redner, S.: Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes. Phys. D 183(3), 190–204 (2003a)
Ben-Naim, E., Krapivsky, P.L., Vazquez, F., Redner, S.: Unity and discord in opinion dynamics. Phys. A 330(1), 99–106 (2003b)
Biswas, S.: Mean-field solutions of kinetic-exchange opinion models. Phys. Rev. E 84, 056106 (2011)
Boudin, L., Salvarani, F.: A kinetic approach to the study of opinion formation. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 43(3), 507–522 (2009a)
Boudin, L., Salvarani, F.: The quasi-invariant limit for a kinetic model of sociological collective behavior. Kinet. Relat. Models 2(3), 433–449 (2009b)
Boudin, L., Mercier, A., Salvarani, F.: Conciliatory and contradictory dynamics in opinion formation. Phys. A 391(22), 5672–5684 (2012)
Brugna, C., Toscani, G.: Kinetic models of opinion formation in the presence of personal conviction. Phys. Rev. E 92(5), 052818/1–9D (2015)
Canuto, C., Fagnani, F., Tilli, P.: An Eulerian approach to the analysis of Krause’s consensus models. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50(1), 243–265 (2012)
Carrillo, J.A., Fornasier, M., Rosado, J., Toscani, G.: Asymptotic flocking dynamics for the kinetic Cucker–Smale model. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 42(1), 218–236 (2010)
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591–646 (2009)
Ceragioli, F., Frasca, P.: Continuous and discontinuous opinion dynamics with bounded confidence. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 13(3), 1239–1251 (2012)
Chatterjee, A.: Socio-economic inequalities: a statistical physics perspective. In: Abergel, F., Aoyama, H., Chakrabarti, B., Chakraborti, A., Ghosh, A. (eds.) Econophysics and Data Driven Modelling of Market Dynamics, New Economic Windows, pp. 287–324. Springer, Berlin (2015)
Comincioli, V., Della Croce, L., Toscani, G.: A Boltzmann-like equation for choice formation. Kinet. Relat. Models 2(1), 135–149 (2009)
Cristiani, E., Tosin, A.: Reducing complexity of multiagent systems with symmetry breaking: an application to opinion dynamics with polls. Multiscale Model. Simul. 16(1), 528–549 (2018)
Crokidakis, N.: Role of noise and agents’ convictions on opinion spreading in a three-state voter-like model. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2013, P07008 (2013)
Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G., Faure, T.: How can extremism prevail? A study on the relative agreement interaction model. JASSS 5(4) (2002). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/1.html
DeGroot, M.H.: Reaching a consensus. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69(345), 118–121 (1974)
Dimarco, G., Pareschi, L.: Numerical methods for kinetic equations. Acta Numer. 23, 369–520 (2014)
Dimarco, G., Loubère, R., Narski, J., Rey, T.: An efficient numerical method for solving the Boltzmann equation in multidimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 353, 46–81 (2018)
Düring, B., Toscani, G.: Hydrodynamics from kinetic models of conservative economies. Phys. A 384(2), 493–506 (2007)
Düring, B., Wolfram, M.-T.: Opinion dynamics: inhomogeneous Boltzmann-type equations modelling opinion leadership and political segregation. Proc. R. Soc. A 471(2182), 20150345/1–21 (2015)
Düring, B., Markowich, P., Pietschmann, J.-F., Wolfram, M.-T.: Boltzmann and Fokker–Planck equations modelling opinion formation in the presence of strong leaders. Proc. R. Soc. A 465(2112), 3687–3708 (2009)
French Jr., J.R.P.: A formal theory of social power. Psychol. Rev. 63(3), 181–194 (1956)
Galam, S.: Rational group decision making: a random field Ising model at \({T}=0\). Phys. A 238(1), 66–80 (1997)
Galam, S.: Heterogeneous beliefs, segregation, and extremism in the making of public opinions. Phys. Rev. E 71, 046123 (2005)
Garavello, M., Natalini, R., Piccoli, B., Terracina, A.: Conservation laws with discontinuous flux. Netw. Heterog. Media 2(1), 159–179 (2007)
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simulat. 5(3), 1–33 (2002)
Jabin, P.-E., Motsch, S.: Clustering and asymptotic behavior in opinion formation. J. Differ. Equ. 257(11), 4165–4187 (2014)
Lallouache, M., Chakrabarti, A.S., Chakraborti, A., Chakrabarti, B.K.: Opinion formation in kinetic exchange models: spontaneous symmetry-breaking transition. Phys. Rev. E 82, 056112 (2010)
Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: a survey. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18(12), 1819–1838 (2007)
Martins, A.C.R., Galam, S.: Building up of individual inflexibility in opinion dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 87, 042807 (2013)
Motsch, S., Tadmor, E.: Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus. SIAM Rev. 56(4), 577–621 (2014)
Ni, W., Cheng, D.: Leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems under fixed and switching topologies. Syst. Control Lett. 59(3–4), 209–217 (2010)
Pareschi, L., Russo, G.: Time relaxed Monte Carlo methods for the Boltzmann equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23(4), 1253–1273 (2001)
Pareschi, L., Toscani, G.: Interacting Multiagent Systems: Kinetic Equations and Monte Carlo Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)
Pareschi, L., Zanella, M.: Structure preserving schemes for mean-field equations of collective behavior. In: Westdickenberg, M., Klingenberg, C. (eds.) Theory, Numerics and Applications of Hyperbolic Problems II, HYP 2016, Volume 237 of Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, pp. 405–421. Springer, Cham (2018a)
Pareschi, L., Zanella, M.: Structure preserving schemes for nonlinear Fokker–Planck equations and applications. J. Sci. Comput. 74(3), 1575–1600 (2018b)
Pareschi, L., Vellucci, P., Zanella, M.: Kinetic models of collective decision-making in the presence of equality bias. Phys. A 467, 201–217 (2017)
Shu, C.-W.: High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems. SIAM Rev. 51(1), 82–126 (2009)
Slanina, F., Lavicka, H.: Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion formation. Eur. Phys. J. B 35(2), 279–288 (2003)
Stella, L., Bagagiolo, F., Bauso, D., Como, G.: Opinion dynamics and stubbornness through mean-field games. In: 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Florence, Italy, pp. 2519–2524 (2013)
Sznajd-Weron, K., Sznajd, J.: Opinion evolution in closed community. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11(6), 1157–1165 (2000)
Toscani, G.: Kinetic models of opinion formation. Commun. Math. Sci. 4(3), 481–496 (2006)
Toscani, G., Tosin, A., Zanella, M.: Opinion modeling on social media and marketing aspects. Phys. Rev. E 98(2), 022315/1–15 (2018)
Tosin, A., Zanella, M.: Boltzmann-type models with uncertain binary interactions. Commun. Math. Sci. 16(4), 962–984 (2018)
Villani, C.: On a new class of weak solutions to the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann and Landau equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 143(3), 273–307 (1998)
Watts, D.J., Dodds, P.S.: Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consum. Res. 34(4), 441–458 (2007)
Weidlich, W.: Sociodynamics: A Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam (2000)
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) through the “Dipartimenti di Eccellenza” Programme (2018–2022)—Department of Mathematics “F. Casorati”, University of Pavia and Department of Mathematical Sciences “G. L. Lagrange”, Politecnico di Torino (CUP: E11G18000350001) and through the PRIN 2017 Project (No. 2017KKJP4X) “Innovative numerical methods for evolutionary partial differential equations and applications”. This work is also part of the activities of the Starting Grant “Attracting Excellent Professors” funded by “Compagnia di San Paolo” (Torino) and promoted by Politecnico di Torino. L.P. is member of GNCS (Gruppo Nazionale per il Calcolo Scientifico) of INdAM (Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica), Italy. G.T, A.T. and M.Z. are members of GNFM (Gruppo Nazionale per la Fisica Matematica) of INdAM, Italy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Dr. Paul Newton.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pareschi, L., Toscani, G., Tosin, A. et al. Hydrodynamic Models of Preference Formation in Multi-agent Societies. J Nonlinear Sci 29, 2761–2796 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-019-09558-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-019-09558-z