Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of G2-checkpoint dynamics on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In experimental studies, it has been found that certain cell lines are more sensitive to low-dose radiation than would be expected from the classical Linear–Quadratic model (LQ model). In fact, it is frequently observed that cells incur more damage at low dose (say 0.3 Gy) than at higher dose (say 1 Gy). This effect has been termed hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS). The effect depends on the type of cells and on their phase in the cell cycle when radiation is applied. Experiments have shown that the G2-checkpoint plays an important role in the HRS effects. Here we design and analyze a differential equation model for the cell cycle that includes G2-checkpoint dynamics and radiation treatment. We fit the model to surviving fraction data for different cell lines including glioma cells, prostate cancer cells, as well as to cell populations that are enriched in certain phases of the cell cycle. The HRS effect is measured in the literature through \(\frac{\alpha _s}{\alpha }\), the ratio of slope \(-\,\alpha _s\) of the surviving fraction curve at zero dose to slope \(-\,\alpha \) of the corresponding LQ model. We derive an explicit formula for this ratio and we show that it corresponds very closely to experimental observations. Finally, we identify the dependence of this ratio on the surviving fraction at 2 Gy. It was speculated in the literature that such dependence exists. Our theoretical analysis will help to more systematically identify the HRS in cell lines, and opens doors to analyze its use in cancer treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brenner DJ (2008) The linear–quadratic model is an appropriate methodology for determining isoeffective doses at large doses per fraction. In: Seminars in radiation oncology, vol 18. Elsevier, pp 234–239

  • Cannon GM, Tomé WA, Robins HI, Howard SP (2007) Pulsed reduced dose-rate radiotherapy: case report. J Neurooncol 83(3):307–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castedo M, Perfettini J-L, Roumier T, Andreau K, Medema R, Kroemer G (2004) Cell death by mitotic catastrophe: a molecular definition. Oncogene 23(16):2825–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras C, Carrero G, de Vries G (2017) Personal communication

  • Dilworth JT, Krueger SA, Dabjan M, Grills IS, Torma J, Wilson GD, Marples B (2013) Pulsed low-dose irradiation of orthotopic glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a pre-clinical model: effects on vascularization and tumor control. Radiother Oncol 108(1):149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elledge SJ (1996) Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274(5293):1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernet M, Mégnin-Chanet F, Hall J, Favaudon V (2010) Control of the G2/M checkpoints after exposure to low doses of ionising radiation: implications for hyper-radiosensitivity. DNA Repair 9(1):48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, dos Santos MM, Finlay C, Hillen T (2013) Are more complicated tumour control probability models better? Math Med Biol 30(1):1–19

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman J, Weare J (2010) Ensemble samplers with affine invariance. Commun Appl Math Comput Sci 5(1):65–80

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner MC, Lambin P, Marples B (1999) Adaptive response and induced resistance. C R Acad Sci Ser III Sci Vie 322(2):167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner MC, Marples B, Lambin P, Short SC, Turesson I (2001) Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49(2):379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger SA, Collis SJ, Joiner MC, Wilson GD, Marples B (2007) Transition in survival from low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity to increased radioresistance is independent of activation of ATM SER1981 activity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69(4):1262–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger SA, Wilson GD, Piasentin E, Joiner MC, Marples B (2010) The effects of G2-phase enrichment and checkpoint abrogation on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(5):1509–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin P (1996) Might intrinsic radioresistance of human tumour cells be induced by radiation? Int J Radiat Biol 69(3):279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marples B (2004) Is low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity a measure of G2-phase cell radiosensitivity? Cancer Metastasis Rev 23(3–4):197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marples B, Joiner M (1993) The response of chinese hamster V79 cells to low radiation doses: evidence of enhanced sensitivity of the whole cell population. Radiat Res 133(1):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marples P, Lambin KS, MC Joiner B (1997) Low dose hyper-radiosensitivity and increased radioresistance in mammalian cells. Int J Radiat Biol 71(6):721–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marples B, Joiner MC, Skov KA (1994) The effect of oxygen on low-dose hypersensitivity and increased radioresistance in chinese hamster V79-379A cells. Radiat Res 138(1s):S17–S20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marples B, Wouters B, Joiner M (2003) An association between the radiation-induced arrest of G2-phase cells and low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: a plausible underlying mechanism? Radiat Res 160(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marples B, Wouters B, Collis S, Chalmers A, Joiner MC (2004) Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: a consequence of ineffective cell cycle arrest of radiation-damaged G2-phase cells. Radiat Res 161(3):247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin L, Marples B, Coffey M, Lawler M, Hollywood D, Marignol L (2009) Recognition of O6MeG lesions by MGMT and mismatch repair proficiency may be a prerequisite for low-dose radiation hypersensitivity. Radiat Res 172(4):405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mothersill C, Seymour C (1997) Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells. Int J Radiat Biol 71(4):421–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mothersill C, Seymour CB, Joiner MC (2002) Relationship between radiation-induced low-dose hypersensitivity and the bystander effect. Radiat Res 157(5):526–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray A (1994) Cell cycle checkpoints. Curr Opin Cell Biol 6(6):872–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagasawa H, Little JB (1992) Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of $\alpha $-particles. Cancer Res 52(22):6394–6396

    Google Scholar 

  • Olobatuyi O, de Vries G, Hillen T (2017) A reaction–diffusion model for radiation-induced bystander effects. J Math Biol 75(2):341–372

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Powathil GG, Munro AJ, Chaplain MA, Swat M (2016) Bystander effects and their implications for clinical radiation therapy: insights from multiscale in silico experiments. J Theor Biol 401:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr D, Krueger SA, Martin L, Marignol L, Wilson GD, Marples B (2013) Determining if low dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) can be exploited to provide a therapeutic advantage: a cell line study in four glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines. Int J Radiat Biol 89(12):1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short S, Mayes C, Woodcock M, Johns H, Joiner MC (1999) Low dose hypersensitivity in the T98G human glioblastoma cell line. Int J Radiat Biol 75(7):847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short S, Woodcock M, Marples B, Joiner M (2003) Effects of cell cycle phase on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol 79(2):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tome WA, Howard SP (2007) On the possible increase in local tumour control probability for gliomas exhibiting low dose hyper-radiosensitivity using a pulsed schedule. Br J Radiol 80(949):32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters BG, Sy AM, Skarsgard LD (1996) Low-dose hypersensitivity and increased radioresistance in a panel of human tumor cell lines with different radiosensitivity. Radiat Res 146(4):399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the feedback from the Journal Club of the Collaborative Mathematical Biology Group at the University of Alberta. OO is supported by the University of Alberta President’s International Doctoral Award and Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship - Doctoral level, GdeV and TH are supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oluwole Olobatuyi.

Additional information

Dedicated to the memory of Professor Karl-Peter Hadeler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olobatuyi, O., de Vries, G. & Hillen, T. Effects of G2-checkpoint dynamics on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. J. Math. Biol. 77, 1969–1997 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-018-1236-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-018-1236-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation