Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effective degree network disease models

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An effective degree approach to modeling the spread of infectious diseases on a network is introduced and applied to a disease that confers no immunity (a Susceptible-Infectious-Susceptible model, abbreviated as SIS) and to a disease that confers permanent immunity (a Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered model, abbreviated as SIR). Each model is formulated as a large system of ordinary differential equations that keeps track of the number of susceptible and infectious neighbors of an individual. From numerical simulations, these effective degree models are found to be in excellent agreement with the corresponding stochastic processes of the network on a random graph, in that they capture the initial exponential growth rates, the endemic equilibrium of an invading disease for the SIS model, and the epidemic peak for the SIR model. For each of these effective degree models, a formula for the disease threshold condition is derived. The threshold parameter for the SIS model is shown to be larger than that derived from percolation theory for a model with the same disease and network parameters, and consequently a disease may be able to invade with lower transmission than predicted by percolation theory. For the SIR model, the threshold condition is equal to that predicted by percolation theory. Thus unlike the classical homogeneous mixing disease models, the SIS and SIR effective degree models have different disease threshold conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball F (1983) The threshold behavior of epidemic models. J Appl Probab 20: 227–241

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ball F, Neal P (2008) Network epidemic models with two levels of mixing. Math Biosci 212: 69–87

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal S, Grenfell BT, Meyers LA (2007) When individual behaviour matters: homogeneous and network models in epidemiology. J R Soc Interface 4: 879–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer F (2008) Compartmental models in epidemiology. In: Brauer F, Driessche P, Wu J (eds) Mathematical epidemiology, chapter 2. Springer, Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann O, Heesterbeek JAP (2000) Mathematical epidemiology of infectious diseases: model building, analysis, and interpretation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdős P, Rényi A (1959) On random graphs. I. Publ. Math. 6: 290–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine PEM, Clarkson JA (1982) Measles in England and Wales—I: an analysis of factors underlying seasonal patterns. Int J Epidemiol 11: 5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie DT (1976) A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J Comput Phys 22(4): 403–434

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 81(25): 2340–2361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss IZ, Green DM, Kao RR (2006) The effect of contact heterogeneity and multiple routes of transmission on final epidemic size. Math Biosci 203: 124–136

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd AL, Valeika S (2007) Network models in epidemiology: an overview. In: Blasius B, Kurths J, Stone L (eds) Complex population dynamics: nonlinear modeling in ecology, epidemiology and genetics, chapter 1. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal P (2007) Coupling of two SIR epidemic models with variable susceptibility and infectivity. J Appl Probab 44: 41–57

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2002) Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys Rev E 66: 016128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001a) Epidemic dynamics and endemic states in complex networks. Phys Rev E 63: 066117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001b) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys Rev Lett 86: 3200–3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001) Epidemic dynamics and endemic states in complex networks. Phys Rev E 63: 066117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Driessche P, Watmough J (2002) Reproduction numbers and subthreshold endemic equilibria of compartmental models for disease transmission. Math Biosci 180: 29–48

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Varga RS (1962) Matrix iterative analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Volz E (2008) SIR dynamics in random networks with heterogeneous connectivity. J Math Biol 56: 293–310

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junling Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindquist, J., Ma, J., van den Driessche, P. et al. Effective degree network disease models. J. Math. Biol. 62, 143–164 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-010-0331-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-010-0331-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation