Abstract
We analyze the role of international market size differences in determining the investment in process R&D (and thus firms’ competitiveness) in a trade model with oligopolistic market structure, non-homothetic production technology and costly trade. We show that the R&D effort is higher (or even disproportionately so) for firms in the larger market, which causes endogenous asymmetries across countries. As a result, firms in the larger market have higher competitiveness, which increases their market shares in international markets. Furthermore, and contrary to what is predicted by Krugman (Am Econ Rev 70:950–959, 1980) “home market effect”, in equilibrium the larger country does not need to host a disproportionately higher share of the world’s industry than of the world’s demand. Despite this, the larger country can still continue to run a trade surplus in the oligopolistic sector, since it hosts firms with higher competitiveness than firms in the smaller country.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amable B., Verspagen B.: The role of technology in market share dynamics. Appl Econ 27, 197–204 (1995)
Antweiler W., Trefler D.: Increasing returns and all that: a view from trade. Am Econ Rev 92, 93–119 (2002)
Aw B., Roberts M., Xu D.: R&D investments, exporting, and the evolution of firm productivity. Am Econ Rev 98, 451–456 (2008)
Aw, B., Roberts, M., Xu, D.: R&D investment, exporting, and productivity dynamics. NBER Working Paper 14670 (2009)
Backus D., Kehoe P., Kehoe T.: In search of scale effects in trade and growth. J Econ Theory 58, 377–409 (1992)
Baldwin R., Forslid R., Martin P., Ottaviano G., Robert-Nicoud F.: Public Policies and Economic Geography. PUP, Princeton (2003)
Bergoeing, R., Kehoe, T.: Trade theory and trade facts. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 284 (2003)
Bernard A., Jensen J.: Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both?. J Int Econ 47, 1–25 (1999)
Bernard A., Eaton J., Jensen J., Kortum S.: Plants and productivity in international trade. Am Econ Rev 93, 1268–1290 (2003)
Bond, E., Iwasa, K., Nishimura, K.: A dynamic two country Heckscher–Ohlin model with non-homothetic preferences. (forthcoming): Econ Theory (2010)
Brander J.: Intra industry trade in identical commodities. J Int Econ 11, 1–14 (1981)
Brander J., Krugman P.: A ‘reciprocal dumping’ model of international trade. J Int Econ 15, 313–321 (1983)
Campbell J., Hopenhayn H.: Market size matters. J Ind Econ 53, 1–25 (2005)
Davis D.: The home market, trade, and industrial structure. Am Econ Rev 88, 1264–1276 (1998)
Davis, D., Weinstein, D.: Does economic geography matter for international specialization? NBER Working Paper 5706 (1996)
Davis D., Weinstein D.: Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation. Eur Econ Rev 43, 379–407 (1999)
Davis D., Weinstein D.: Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical assessment. J Int Econ 59, 1–23 (2003)
Dinopoulos E., Syropoulos C.: Rent protection as a barrier to innovation and growth. Econ Theory 32, 309–332 (2007)
Eaton J., Gutierrez E., Kortum S.: European technology policy. Econ Policy 13, 405–439 (1998)
Eaton J., Kortum S.: Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70, 1741–1779 (2002)
Fagerberg J.: International competitiveness. Econ J 98, 355–374 (1988)
Fagerberg, J.: Is there a large-country advantage in high-tech? NUPI Working Paper 526 (1995)
Flam H., Helpman E.: Industrial policy under monopolistic competition. J Int Econ 22, 79–102 (1987)
Forslid R., Ottaviano G.: An analytically solvable core-periphery model. J Econ Geogr 3, 229–241 (2003)
Fudenberg D., Tirole J.: The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Am Econ Rev 74, 361–366 (1984)
Fudenberg D., Tirole J.: Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)
Fung M.: Technological opportunity and economies of scale in research productivity: a study on three global industries. Rev Ind Org 21, 419–436 (2002)
Grubel H., Lloyd P.: Intra-Industry Trade. Wiley, New York (1975)
Gustavsson P., Hansson P., Lundberg L.: Technology, resource endowments and international competitiveness. Eur Econ Rev 43, 1501–1530 (1999)
Harrigan J.: Openness to trade in manufactures in the OECD. J Int Econ 40, 23–39 (1996)
Head K., Ries J.: Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of U.S.-Canada trade. Am Econ Rev 91, 858–876 (2001)
Head K., Mayer T., Ries J.: On the pervasiveness of home market effects. Economica 69, 371–390 (2002)
Helpman E.: Imperfect competition and international trade: evidence from fourteen industrial countries. J Japan Int Econ 1, 62–81 (1987)
Hummels D., Levinsohn J.: Monopolistic competition and international trade: reconsidering the evidence. Q J Econ 110, 799–836 (1995)
Krugman P.: Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70, 950–959 (1980)
Krugman P.: Import protection as export promotion: international competition in the presence of oligopoly and economics of scale. In: Kierzkowski, H. (ed.) Monopolistic Competition and International Trade, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1984)
Krugman P.: Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99, 413–499 (1991)
Lachenmaier S., Wöβmannt L.: Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxf Econ Pap 58, 317–350 (2006)
Lai E., Riezman R., Wang P.: Outsourcing of innovation. Econ Theory 38, 485–515 (2009)
Lawrence C., Spiller P.: Product diversity, economies of scale, and international trade. Q J Econ 98, 63–83 (1983)
Leahy D., Neary P.: Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries. Am Econ Rev 87, 642–662 (1997)
Leahy D., Neary P.: Multilateral subsidy games. Econ Theory 41, 41–66 (2009)
Licandro, O., Navas-Ruiz, A.: Trade liberalization, competition and growth. CEPR Discussion Papers 6500 (2007)
Lundbäck E., Torstensson J.: Demand, comparative advantage and economic geography in international trade: evidence from the OECD. Rev World Econ 134, 230–249 (1998)
Lundberg L.: Technology, factor proportions and competitiveness. Scand J Econ 90, 173–189 (1988)
Magnier A., Toujas-Bernate J.: Technology and trade: empirical evidence for the major five industrialized countries. Rev World Econ 130, 494–520 (1994)
Martin P., Rogers C.: Industrial location and public infrastructure. J Int Econ 39, 335–351 (1995)
Melitz M.: The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71, 1695–1725 (2003)
Melitz M., Ottaviano G.: Market size, trade, and productivity. Rev Econ Stud 75, 295–316 (2008)
Naghavi A., Ottaviano G.: Offshoring and product innovation. Econ Theory 38, 517–532 (2009)
Neary P., Tharakan J.: Endogenous Mode of Competition in General Equilibrium. Mimeo University of Oxford, Oxford (2008)
Okuno-Fujiwara M., Suzumura K.: Symmetric Cournot oligopoly and economic welfare: a synthesis. Econ Theory 3, 43–59 (1993)
Ottaviano G., Tabuchi T., Thisse J.-F.: Agglomeration and trade revisited. Int Econ Rev 23, 409–435 (2002)
Petrakis E., Vlassis M.: Endogenous wage bargaining institutions in oligopolistic sectors. Econ Theory 24, 55–73 (2004)
Roberts M., Tybout J.: The decision to export in Colombia: an empirical model of entry with sunk costs. Am Econ Rev 87, 545–564 (1997)
Roper S., Love J.: Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants. Res Policy 31, 1087–1103 (2002)
Syverson C.: Prices, spatial competition and heterogeneous producers: an empirical test. J Ind Econ 55, 197–222 (2007)
Teteryatnikova M.: R&D in the Network of International Trade: Multilateral Versus Regional Trade Agreements. Mimeo European University Institute, Mimeo (2008)
Torstensson J.: Country size and comparative advantage: an empirical study. Rev World Econ 134, 590–611 (1998)
Tybout J.: Plant- and firm-level evidence on the ‘new’ trade theories. In: Kwan Choi, E., Harrigan, J. (eds) Handbook of International Trade, Blackwell, Oxford (2003)
Vives X.: Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Wakelin K.: Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Res Policy 26, 829–842 (1998)
Zhou H.: The division of labor and the extent of the market. Econ Theory 24, 195–209 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We thank Tim Kehoe and two anonymous referees for extremely helpful comments and suggestions. The paper has also benefited greatly from discussions with Gianmarco Ottaviano, Paula Fontoura, Pedro Pita Barros, Pedro Pontes, Peter Neary and Renato Flôres. The usual disclaimer however applies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia Pires, A.J. International trade and competitiveness. Econ Theory 50, 727–763 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0586-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0586-2
Keywords
- Endogenous asymmetric firms
- Competitiveness
- R&D investment
- International trade
- Home market effect
- Oligopoly