Abstract
Solutions are presented for the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations in the 2+1 dimensional space-time created by a massive point particle, with arbitrary angular momentum. A universal formula for the scattering amplitude holds when a required self-adjoint extension of the Dirac operator is specified uniquely. Various obstacles to a consistent quantum mechanical interpretation of these results are noted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
't Hooft, G.: Commun. Math. Phys.117, 685 (1988)
Deser, S., Jackiw, R.: Commun. Math. Phys.118, 495 (1988)
Gott, J.: Ap. J.288, 422 (1985); for a review see Vilenkin, A.: Phys. Rep.121, 263 (1985). The spinning cosmic string was considered by Mazur, P.: Phys. Rev.D34, 1925 (1986), and simultaneously to our work by Harari, D. and Polychronakos, A.: Phys. Rev.D38, 3320 (1988)
Deser, S., Jackiw, R., 't Hooft, G.: Ann Phys. (NY)152, 220 (1984)
The generalization to arbitrary numbers of spinning point particles is given by Clément, G.: Int. J. Theor. Phys.24, 281 (1985), who also studies classical motion
Sommerfeld, A.: Math. Ann,47, 317 (1896) and Optics. New York, NY: Academic Press 1954
We see no reason for energy to be quantized or timet to be periodic as has been claimed by Mazur, P.: Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 929 (1986). Our objections to the reasoning in that paper coincide with those raised by Samuel, J., Iyer, B.: Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2379 (1987) and are apparently accepted by Mazur, P.: Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2380 (1987)
Wigner, E.: Phys. Rev.98, 145 (1955)
A mathematical investigation of Dirac operators on spaces with conical singularities is by Chou, A.: Trans. Am. Math. Soc.289 1 (1985)
Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Ann Phys. (NY)140, 372 (1982) The normalization in (5.4) is chosen so that a well-defined zero mass limit may be taken. But recall that the interpretation of the massless theory is quite different, as might be expected since spin is discontinuous whenm passes through zero. A redefinition of the fields in the massless Dirac theory\(\phi (k)e^{ikr} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sqrt {k_x - ik_y } } & 0 \\ 0 & {\sqrt {k_x + ik_y } } \\ \end{array} } \right)\exp \left\{ {\frac{\pi }{4}\hat k^i \sigma ^i } \right\}\psi _k^0 (r)\) exhibits their almost scalar nature, with discontinuous behaviour under rotationR θ ,\(\phi (k)\xrightarrow[{R_\theta }]{}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} { \phi (R_\theta ^{ - 1} k) if 0 \leqq \theta \leqq 2\pi } \\ { - \phi (R_\theta ^{ - 1} k) if 2\pi< \theta< 4\pi } \\ \end{array} } \right.\) because the functions\(\sqrt {k_x \mp ik_y } \) are double-valued; see Binegar, B.: J. Math. Phys.23, 1511 (1982). Parity is not violated in this case
One has to choose thedreibein that yields the proper flat space limit [S=0, α=1], with solutions to the Dirac equation that are single-valued and periodic in θ. This would not be the case if in (5.13) θ=0
Similar problems have been studied in monopole physics by Goldhaber, A.: Phys. Rev.D16, 1815 (1977) and Callias, C.: Phys. Rev.D16, 3068 (1977), who found that thes-wave radial Dirac Hamiltonian is not self-adjoint. Chou in ref. 9 recognized the possible loss of self-adjointness of the Dirac operator on conical spaces, but did not study extensions
Alvarez-Gaumé, L., Della Pietra, S., Moore, G.: Ann. Phys. (NY)163, 288 (1985); Goni, M., Valle, M.: Phys. Rev.D34, 648 (1986); Vuorio, I.: Phys. Lett.B175, 176 (1986)
Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 975 (1982) and Ann. Phys. (NY)140, 372 (1982
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by B. Simon
This work is supported in part by funds provided by the U.S. Department of Energy (D.O.E.) under contract #DE-AC02-76ER03069
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Sousa Gerbert, P., Jackiw, R. Classical and quantum scattering on a spinning cone. Commun. Math. Phys. 124, 229–260 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01219196
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01219196