Skip to main content
Log in

Wave-packet reduction as a medium of communication

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using an apparatus in which two scalers register decays from a radioactive source, an observer located near one of the scalers attempted to convey a message to an observer located near the other one by choosing to look or to refrain from looking at his scaler. The results indicate that no message was conveyed. Doubt is thereby thrown upon the hypothesis that the reduction of the wave packet is due to the interaction of the physical apparatus with the psyche of an observer.

A. Einstein(1)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Einstein, inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (The Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, Illinois, 1949), p. 683.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Schrödinger,Naturwiss. 23, 807, 823, 844 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. P. Wigner,Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. H. Furry, Some Aspects of the Quantum Theory of Measurement, inLectures in Theoretical Physics, Vol. VIII-A, W. Britten, ed. (Univ. of Colorado Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. d'Espagnat,Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, Menlo Park, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Bohr, On the Notions of Complementarity and Causality,Dialectica 2, 312 (1948); reprinted in N. Bohr,Essays, 1958–1962, on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, London, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. F. von Weizsäcker, The Copenhagen Interpretation, inQuantum Theory and Beyond, T. Bastin, ed. (University Press, Cambridge, 1971), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. J. Groenwold,Proc. Amsterdam Academy (B) 55, 219 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Shimony,Am. J. Phys. 31, 755 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Stein, On the Conceptual Structure of Quantum Mechanics, inParadigms and Paradoxes: The Philosophical Challenge of the Quantum Domain, Vol. 5 in the University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, R. Colodny, ed. (Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. A. Hooker, The Nature of Quantum Mechanical Reality: Einstein versus Bohr, inParadigms and Paradoxes, R. Colodny, ed. (Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. Costa de Beauregard, Du Paradoxe au Paradigme,Epistemological Letters of the Institut de la Méthode, 2nd issue (May 1974).

  14. O. Costa de Beauregard,Found. Phys. 6, 539 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. London and E. Bauer,La Théorie de l'Observation en Mécanique Quantique (Hermann, Paris, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. P. Wigner, Two Kinds of Reality, inSymmetries and Reflections (Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ron Smith, unpublished, MIT (1968).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Aided in part by National Science Foundation support to one of the authors (A.S.).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, J., Kim, C., McElroy, B. et al. Wave-packet reduction as a medium of communication. Found Phys 7, 759–767 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708593

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708593

Keywords

Navigation