Abstract
Nowadays there are commercial devices such as the GT3X+ that can analyze the performance of those who practice some kind of sport, but these devices tend to be rather expensive and complex to use. The objectives of this research are: i) to study the correlation between the measurements of the physical activity with the smartphone and a dedicated accelerometer GT3X+ through the calculation of the counts, ii) to analyze the influence of the position of the smartphone and iii) compare several methods to calculate the energy expenditure trough the counts. Nine volunteers participated in an experiment. They performed different physical activities carrying a smartphone in the right pocket and another one in the hip, together with the GT3X+. The results obtained show a high correlation between the GT3X+ and smartphones for the different types of training (hip and pocket). However the result of the ANOVA indicates that there is no significant difference between the positions of the smartphone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liu, S., Gao, R.X., John, D., Staudenmayer, J., Freedson, P.: SVM-Based Multi-Sensor Fusion for Free-Living Physical Activity Assessment. IEEE in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3188–3191 (2011)
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44441/1/9789243599977_spa.pdf, recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) (accessed January 24, 2016)
Liu, S., Gao, R.X., Freedson, P.: Design of a wearable multi-sensor system for physical activity assessment. In: IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, pp. 254–259 (2010)
Mo, L., Liu, S., Gao, R.X., Freedson, P.: Energy-efficient and data synchronized body sensor network for physical activity measurement. In: Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, pp. 1120–1124 (2013)
Gyllensten, I.C., Bonomi, A.G.: Identifying Types of Physical Activity With a Single Accelerometer: Evaluating Laboratory-trained Algorithms in Daily Life. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 58(9) (2011)
Hekler, E.H., Buman, P.M., Grieco, L., Rosenberger, M., Winter, J.S., Haskell, W., King, C.A.: Validation of Physical Activity Tracking via Android Smartphones Compared to Actigraph Accelerometer: Laboratory-Based and Free-Living Validation Studies. JMIR mHealth uHealth 3(2), e36 (2015)
http://www.actigraph.nl/downloads/getDownload/id/24, ActiLife 6 User’s Manual (accessed January 24, 2016)
https://help.theactigraph.com/entries/20723176-What-are-counts-, What are counts (accessed January 24, 2016)
https://help.theactigraph.com/entries/21452826-What-s-the-difference-among-the-Cut-Points-available-in-ActiLife-, cut points of the actilife (accessed January 24, 2016)
Peach, D., Van Hoomissen, J., Callender, H.L.: Exploring the ActiLife® filtration algorithm: converting raw acceleration data to counts. Physiol. Meas. 35, 2359–2367 (2014). IOP Publishing
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rodriguez, V.H., Medrano, C., Plaza, I., Corella, C., Abarca, A., Julian, J.A. (2016). Estimating the Physical Activity with Smartphones: Analysis of the Device Position and Comparison with GT3X+ Actigraph. In: Lindgren, H., et al. Ambient Intelligence- Software and Applications – 7th International Symposium on Ambient Intelligence (ISAmI 2016). ISAmI 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 476. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40114-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40114-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40113-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40114-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)