Skip to main content

Modelling Agents’ Perception: Issues and Challenges in Multi-agents Based Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9273))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3965 Accesses

Abstract

In virtual agents modelling, perception has been one of main focus for cognitive modelling and multi-agent-based simulation. Research has been guided by the representation of human senses operations. In this sense, perception focus remains on the absorption of changes that occur in the environment. Unfortunately, scientific literature has not covered the representation of most of the perception mechanisms that are supposed to exist in an agent’s brain like for example ambiguity. In terms of multi-agent based systems, perception is reduced to a parameter forgetting the complex mechanisms behind it. The goal of this article is to point out that the challenge of modelling perception ought to be centred on the internal mechanisms of perception that occur in our brains, which increases the heterogeneity among agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ray, A.: Autonomous perception and decision-making in cyberspace. In: The 8th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Colombo, Sri Lanka, April 26–28, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  2. Uno, K., Kashiyama, K.: Development of simulation system for the disaster evacuation based on multi-agent model using GIS. Tsinghua Science and Technology 13(1), 348–353 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shi, J., Ren, A., Chen, C.: Agent-based evacuation model of large public buildings under fire conditions. Automation in Construction 18(3), 338–347 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma, S.: Simulation and modelling of group behaviour during emergency evacuation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Intelligent Agents, Nashville, Tennessee, pp. 122–127, March 30–April 2, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rymill, S.J., Dodgson, N.A.: Psychologically-based vision and attention for the simulation of human behaviour. In: Proceedings of Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Dunedin, New Zealand, pp. 229–236, November 29–December 2, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pelechano, N., Allbeck, J., Badler, N.: Controlling individual agents in high-density crowd simulation. In: 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, San Diego, California, pp. 99–108, August 2–4, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47, 139–159 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Piza, H., Ramos, F., Zuniga, F.: Virtual sensors for dynamic virtual environments. In: Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steel, T., Kuiper, D., Wenkstern, R.: Virtual agent perception in multi-agent based simulation systems. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuiper, D., Wenkstern, R.Z.: Virtual agent perception in large scale multi-agent based simulation systems (Extended Abstract). In: Tumer, K., Yolum, P., Sonenberg, L., Stone, P. (eds.) Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1235–1236, May 2–6, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. Magessi, N., Antunes, L.: An Architecture for Agent’s Risk Perception. Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal 1(5), 75–85 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schacter, D.L., Gilbert, D.T., Wagner, D.M.: Psychology, 2nd edn. Worth, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Magessi, N., Antunes, L.: Modelling agents’ risk perception. In: Omatu, S., Neves, J., Corchado Rodriguez, J.M., Paz Santana, J.F., Gonzalez, S.R. (eds.) Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence. AISC, vol. 217, pp. 275–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernstein, D.A: Essentials of Psychology. Cengage Learning. pp. 123–124. ISBN 978-0-495-90693-3 (Retrieved March 25, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gregory, R.: Perception. In: Gregory, R.L., Zangwill, O.L., pp. 598–601 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson, J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing (1977). ISBN 0-470-99014-7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Norman, D.: Affordance, Conventions and Design. Interactions 6(3), 38–43 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson, S.J., Yamagishi, N., Karavia, V.: Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269(1497), 1225 (2002). doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ropeik, D.: How Risky Is It, Really? Why Our Fears Don’t Always Match the Facts. McGraw Hill, March 2010

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steel, T., Kuiper, D., Wenkstern, R.Z.: Context-aware virtual agents in open environments. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (ICAS 2010), Cancun, Mexico, March 7–13, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fine, K., Rescher, Nicholas: The Logic of Decision and Action. Philosophical Quarterly 20(80), 287 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eagleman, D.: Visual Illusions and Neurobiology. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2(12), 920–926 (2001). doi:10.1038/35104092. PMID: 11733799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yabus, A.: “Eye movements and vision”, chapter Eye movements during perception of complex objects. Plenum Press, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Danks, D.: The Psychology of Causal Perception and Reasoning. In: Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C., Menzies, P. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kurzweil, R.: How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed. Viking Books, New York (2012). ISBN 978-0-670-02529-9

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barwise, J., Perry, J.: Situations and attitudes. MIT Press/Bradford, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Devlin, K.: Logic and information, pp. 49–51. Cambridge University Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuno Trindade Magessi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Magessi, N.T., Antunes, L. (2015). Modelling Agents’ Perception: Issues and Challenges in Multi-agents Based Systems. In: Pereira, F., Machado, P., Costa, E., Cardoso, A. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9273. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23485-4_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23485-4_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23484-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23485-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics