Abstract
What is the scope of identity? The intuitive response is that it applies everywhere, since every object is identical to itself. In this sense, identity is a general concept. In this chapter, I argue for the generality of identity by critically examining some attempts at relativizing it. I argue that each alleged instance of relativization ultimately presupposes identity, and as a result, identity still stands – in all of its un-relativized glory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Considerations in support of the unsubstantial character of identity can be found in [1].
- 2.
The assumption is not unreasonable. Consider a physical magnitude, such as gravitational potential in field theories, and suppose that each value of this magnitude is a particular property. In this case, as one moves away from the source of the field, the field intensity decreases continuously. As a result, there would be uncountably many properties (see [10]). A far more controversial illustration would be this: Consider the properties identical to the real number 0, identical to the real number 1, identical to the real number 2, and so on. Note that each property of this kind is a property only of the corresponding number: identical to 0 is a property of 0, and 0 alone; identical to 1 is a property of 1, and 1 alone, etc. Since there are uncountably many real numbers, there are uncountably many properties. Identity already figures here, as it should, as an extremely general (relational) property; in fact, it is arguably the most general one. It may be complained that identity is not a property, but a relation of an object to itself and to no other object (see, for instance, [11]). But this clearly presupposes identity [2]: the reference to “no other object” requires that there is no object distinct (that is, not identical to) the one under consideration. And it is unclear what else identity could be.
- 3.
For discussions of absolute generality, see the papers in [7].
References
Bueno, O.: Why Identity is Fundamental. Am. Philos. Q. 51, 325–332 (2014)
Deutsch, H.: Relative identity. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition). (2008). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/identity-relative
French, S. Krause, D.: Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2006)
Krause, D., Béziau, J.-Y.: Relativizations of the Principle of Identity. Log. J. Interest Group Pure Appl. Log. 5, 327–338 (1997)
McGinn, C.: Logical Properties. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2000)
Mendelson, E.: Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 4th edn. Chapman and Hall, London (1997)
Rayo, A., Uzquiano, G. (eds.): Absolute Generality. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2006)
Savellos, E.: On Defining Identity. Notre Dame J. Form. Log. 31, 476–484 (1990)
Shapiro, S.: Foundations without Foundationalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)
Swoyer, C., Orilia, F.: Properties. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition). (2014). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/properties
Zalabardo, J.: Introduction to the Theory of Logic. Westview Press, Boulder (2000)
Acknowledgment
My thanks go to Jean-Yves Béziau, Newton da Costa, Steven French, Décio Krause, and Alan Weir for extremely helpful discussions. It is a pleasure to offer this paper to Jean-Yves on the occasion of his 50th birthday. It still feels as though it was only yesterday that he arrived for the first time in Brazil to change so much of the logical landscape in the country – and elsewhere. It’s surprising that two decades have already passed since then!
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
To Jean-Yves Béziau
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bueno, O. (2015). Can Identity Be Relativized?. In: Koslow, A., Buchsbaum, A. (eds) The Road to Universal Logic. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15368-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15368-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15367-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15368-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)